Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/September 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
Q1: Why is [Insert event here], an event that is "more important and significant" than all the others that are currently listed, not posted?
A1: Relative article quality along with the mix of topics already listed are often deciding factors in what gets posted. Any given day of the year can have a great many important or significant historical events. The problem is that there is generally only room on the Main Page to list about 5 events at a time, so not everything can be posted.
As stated on Wikipedia:FAQ/Main Page, the items and events posted on the Main Page are chosen based more on how well they are written, not based on how much important or significant their subjects are. It is easier for admins to select a well-written, cited, verifiable article over a poor one versus trying to determine objectively how much a subject is important or significant.
Keep in mind that the quality requirements only apply to the selected bolded article, not the other links. Thus, an event may qualify for multiple dates in a year if there is an article written in a summary style and an article providing detailed content; if one of those pages have cleanup issues, the other page can be bolded as an alternate.
Another criterion is to maintain some variety of topics, and not exhibit, just for example, tech-centrism, or the belief that the world stops at the edge of the English-speaking world. Many days have a large pool of potential articles, so they will rotate in and out every year to give each one some Main Page exposure. In addition, an event is not posted if it is also the subject of this year's scheduled featured article or featured picture.
Q2: There are way too many 20th-century events listed. Why aren't there more events from the 19th century and before?
A2: The short, basic reason is the systemic bias of Wikipedia. There are not enough good, well-written articles on 19th-century and earlier events for all 365 days in the year. Currently, a majority of users seem to be generally more interested in writing articles about recent events. If you would like to further help mitigate the systemic bias in Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias.
Q3: This page seems to be biased toward events based in [Insert country or region here]. What can be done about it?
A3: This again is attributed to the systemic bias of Wikipedia. Many users are generally more interested in working on good, well-written articles pertaining to their home country. Since this is the English Wikipedia, there will be more English-speaking users, and thus more articles pertaining to English-speaking countries. And if there are more users who are from the United States, there will probably be more well-written articles about events based in the United States. Again, if you would like to further help mitigate the systemic bias in Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias.
Q4: Why is the birthday of [Insert name here] not listed?
A4: Births and deaths can only be used on centennials, etc. Exceptions can be made if they are directly related to assassinations, executions, natural disasters, civil accidents, genocide/extinction, or other historically significant topics that frequently appear on the Selected Anniversaries pages.
Q5: Are the holidays/observances listed in any particular order?
A5: Yes, there is a specified order: International observances first, then alphabetically by where observed.
Q6: Some of the holidays/observances that are listed have dates in parentheses beside them. What do they mean?
A6: There are two reasons that some holidays/observances have dates next to them:
  • Non-Gregorian-based holidays/observances are marked with the current year as a reminder to others that their dates do in fact vary from year to year.
  • National Days, Independence Days, and other holidays celebrating the nationhood of a country are generally marked by the year of the significant historic date being observed.
Today's featured article for September 18, 2018 Today's featured picture for September 18, 2018
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 18, 2018

viewtalkedit


create

Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/September 17 * Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/September 19


Chiropractic history

Moved from User talk:Zzyzx11#September 18[1]

My point is that I find it unacceptable to promote chiropractic on the front page. Find another event. DS (talk) 04:51, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Why? And what should be the alternative? Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
There has been a few complaints for more non- 20th Century events. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:54, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
In many ways, chiropractic is bullshit. How about the Treaty of Belgrade, or the Battle of Chojnice, or... ooh, the Panic of 1873, which seems particularly appropriate given recent economic turmoil in the US? And then we can replace the picture of Palmer with the one of Stolypin again. DS (talk) 04:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Treaty of Belgrade may be too stubby. Battle of Chojnice is tagged with {{unreferenced}}. And I am hesitant about Panic of 1873 because of complaints on Talk:Main Page#September 11 and Talk:Main Page#Rampant Pro-Rail bias on Main Page !!! for similar subjects on main pages as a whole. As for "chiropractic is bullshit", that is more an WP:POV or WP:OR opinion/complaint on your part than a legitimate reason, more like the opinions of users who I have to point to Wikipedia:FAQ/Main Page#I think that the articles listed on the Main Page are awful. Isn't the Main Page biased towards certain topics? What can be done about it?. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
The consensus of the WP:OTD pages, and the articles featured on the main page in general, are based on how well the articles are written. The are NOT chosen based on how much their subjects are important or significant, or how one feels about the subject. I find that your unilateral edit, saying that "chiropractic is bullshit" was made solely based on your personal feelings on the subject! I will keep the item off because I wish to not edit/wheel war any further. Regards. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm only three-quarters awake at this time. DS (talk) 05:23, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

2012 notes

howcheng {chat} 05:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 18 September 2012

Please protect this page more thoroughly; while it tells me that I can't edit it, I'm given an "edit" button instead of a "view source" button.

2001:18E8:2:1020:B1B9:4E32:3CE8:AB45 (talk) 17:55, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Although the tab is indeed titled "Edit", you'll find that you can't make changes to the text. The page is cascade protected, which means that it inherits the strictest protection level of all of the pages that it's transcluded to. For example, it's transcluded in Wikipedia:Main Page/1, which is fully protected; therefore Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/September 18 is fully protected as well. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

2013 notes

howcheng {chat} 15:52, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

2014 notes

howcheng {chat} 07:11, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

2015 notes

howcheng {chat} 07:19, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

2016 notes

howcheng {chat} 06:39, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 notes

howcheng {chat} 17:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Selected_anniversaries/September_18&oldid=801259503"
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Selected_anniversaries/September_18
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/September 18"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA