Wikipedia talk:Copyrights

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit request

In the WP:COPYLINK section Contributory infringement points to a disambiguation page, it should point to Contributory copyright infringement. - Ahunt (talk) 14:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

? Looks okay to me (it's a piped link) — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:25, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be the right target now! - Ahunt (talk) 14:27, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Copying text from other sources

Can we add a link to Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources somewhere on this page? It explains a number of relevant copyright issues, and includes links to more detailed pages like Wikipedia:Adding open license text to Wikipedia that readers of Wikipedia:Copyrights might be looking for. Daask (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Historic copyvios

By way of experiment, I put the article Sea urchin into Earwig's tool and it came up with a copyvio, a paragraph inserted in the article on 28 October 2008‎. Having found this violation, I thought I had better remove it and have now requested a rev-del, but that covers a vast number of revisions. If one searched diligently for copyvios, one might end up with large numbers of important articles being affected and needing rev-dels. Is that desirable? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:25, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Is it desirable? Yes and no. Yes, we must remove copyright violations when we find them. Period. That is 100% required. The problem with these old ones is that it is sometimes hard to determine who copied who. It does appear to have been copied from that source (not the other way around) per the 2008 archive of that article. Excellent job finding it. As for revdel. isn't just that revision. It is every revision since then that would have to be removed. We are talking thousands of revisions that need to be removed. That may not actually happen as it would utter destroy the history of the article. --Majora (talk) 21:42, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
In this case, there is an obvious solution... REWRITE the offending paragraph. Present the information using different words... No more copyvio. I would actually say that rewriting should be the preferred solution for any paragraph sized (or smaller) Copyvio... Fix the problem with a scalpel rather than a chainsaw. Blueboar (talk) 22:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Rewrite or remove. The point being that the violating material must be dealt with. The revdel'ing of said material is a different matter in this case as it would be thousands of revisions. --Majora (talk) 23:10, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
I am glad that you seem to agree with me that removing the copyvio, whether by cutting or rewriting, from the present and future versions of the article is the most important thing, and that rev-delling the hundreds of offending revisions is an undesirable and impractical solution. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
So... having identified a problematic paragraph (and agreeing that the best solution is a simple rewrite)... have you been proactive and fixed the problem yourself (or at least tagged it so someone else can fix it)? Blueboar (talk) 13:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Well, I removed the violation, which was the most important thing, and I have now removed the rev-del request. I thought the information pretty peripheral and not really needing replacement, but I did decide that improving the whole of the article would be my next main project. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from ""
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia :
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Wikipedia talk:Copyrights"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA