Wikipedia:XfD today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page transcludes (or when this is not feasible, links to) all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.

Contents


Speedy deletion candidates

The category is at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.

Articles

Guide to deletion
Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.

Purge server cache

List of shopping malls in Zamboanga City

List of shopping malls in Zamboanga City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of shopping malls in Zamboanga City" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Content fork from List of shopping malls in the Philippines. Only three list entries have articles and only of one of those appears to be really notable. No sources verifying the remaining entries and summaries. As a general observation, lists of shopping malls specific to cities isn't the norm on Wikipedia Ajf773 (talk) 19:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 19:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 19:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 19:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Giota Lydia

Giota Lydia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Giota Lydia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Neither the article's one sentence nor its one reference demonstrate that Giota Lydia is notable by Wikipedia standards. Eddie Blick (talk) 19:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Hoyda yarim

Hoyda yarim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hoyda yarim" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Neither the article's content nor its references demonstrate that the tune is notable. Eddie Blick (talk) 19:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Ken J Bradley

Ken J Bradley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ken J Bradley" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The article's sources are unreliable, and not a single result in a Google News search. Note to article creator: I can help you get used to Wikipedia if you want. J947 19:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

STV News and General

STV News and General (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "STV News and General" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This page adds nothing significant to the STV News and General item in the TV channels section of Shanghai Media Group. Eddie Blick (talk) 19:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

David Channing Williams

David Channing Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "David Channing Williams" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This article needs more references and more content to demonstrate the notability of David Channing Williams. Eddie Blick (talk) 19:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

3DimViewer

3DimViewer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "3DimViewer" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The prod was contested. There is no coverage of this software that makes it pass WP:N. SL93 (talk) 19:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 19:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • delete can't find any sources to show notability, looks more like promotion. KylieTastic (talk) 19:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Mohamed Hakkim

Mohamed Hakkim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Mohamed Hakkim" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This article tells more about the subject's father than it tells about the subject himself. It does not demonstrate the notability of Dr. Mohamed Hakkim. Eddie Blick (talk) 19:24, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Peter Adolf Persson

Peter Adolf Persson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Peter Adolf Persson" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I am not finding sufficient sources to establish notability for WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST. –CaroleHenson (talk) 18:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 19:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 19:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep The Swedish Wikipedia has a more substantial article with references here. We should expand by translating that article. Most, if not all available sources appear to be in Swedish. He is in the collections of the National Museum in Stockholm and a few others, satisfying WP:ARTIST. He is listed in Svenska konstnärer, Biografisk handbok (Swedish artists, biographical handbook) and Svenskt konstnärslexikon (Swedish artists dictionary) which should make this pass WP:GNG. freshacconci (✉) 19:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Vishal Malik (actor)

Vishal Malik (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Vishal Malik (actor)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable actor. No reliable sources. Fails WP:NACTOR as has not had significant roles in multiple notable films etc. Tassedethe (talk) 18:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Donnegy Fer

Donnegy Fer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Donnegy Fer" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I know almost nothing about football but this fails WP:NFOOTY as he was an unused substitute and hasn't actually played as far as I can find. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Tiridine bandım

Tiridine bandım (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Tiridine bandım" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Although I cannot read the language of the references, they appear to be lists of contents of CDs. I see nothing to indicate that this song has been "the subject of multiple, non-trivial[3] published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label", which would demonstrate notability. Eddie Blick (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMdYKCuub60 Odeon Records --Samizambak (talk) 18:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pWY9Adc5Fk Zehra Bilir She was known as the Edith Piaf of Turkey. --Samizambak (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q91FajDX7cU Giota Lydia --Samizambak (talk) 18:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
http://turkoloji.cu.edu.tr/pdf/eyup_akman_tiridine_bandim_sathiye.pdf (Turkish) --Samizambak (talk) 19:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
https://hbogm.meb.gov.tr/modulerprogramlar/programlar/muzik_gosteri/T%C3%BCrkHalkOyunlari/THO_Kastamonu.pdf --Samizambak (talk) 19:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
http://mebk12.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/37/13/169022/dosyalar/2012_12/05094853_halkoyunlari.pdf Samizambak (talk) 19:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
http://vinyl.gr/His%20master's%20voice%202801-2850.html Giota Lydia(HIS MASTER'S VOICE 7PG 2821 (7XGA 755) ΔΕΝ ΘΑ ΖΟΥΜΕ ΑΙΩΝΙΑ - ΓΙΩΤΑ ΛΥΔΙΑ - (Στράτος Ατταλίδης) - Συνοδεία Λαϊκής Ορχήστρας - Διεύθυνσις Θόδωρος Δερβενιώτης - Τσιφτετέλι Κυκλοφόρησε στις 15-11-1960) --Samizambak (talk) 19:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Nitin Bhajiyawala

Nitin Bhajiyawala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Nitin Bhajiyawala" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This article needs more information and more references to demonstrate the notability of the subject. Eddie Blick (talk) 18:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Subrat Das

Subrat Das (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Subrat Das" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Neither the article itself nor its two references demonstrate that the subject is notable. Eddie Blick (talk) 18:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Sanjeev Dua

Sanjeev Dua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Sanjeev Dua" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Neither the article itself nor its references demonstrate that the subject is notable. Eddie Blick (talk) 18:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Laia Martínez i López

Laia Martínez i López (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Laia Martínez i López" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not sufficient sources to establish WP:GNG per news and nothing at Google custom searchCaroleHenson (talk) 17:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

GVK Biosciences

GVK Biosciences (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "GVK Biosciences" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unremarable business. Reeks of spam. TheLongTone (talk) 16:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Keep: Contains promotional content that needs to be removed. Other than that, seems to have received enough coverage. RoCo(talk) 16:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

2098

2098 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "2098" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No sourced events at all, and WP:CRYSTAL. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 16:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Comment: Does not go against WP:CRYSTAL as it does not yet predict any events. RoCo(talk) 16:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Boo Laura Storm Jackson

Boo Laura Storm Jackson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Boo Laura Storm Jackson" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:BIO. She's credited with one role ("Imagine me and You") and coverage does not exceed "passing mentions". DePRODBLP'd, since one source (though not independent) was mentioned. Kleuske (talk) 16:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete - Article possible violates WP:BIO. The article is also poorly written and has no context whatsoever. Seems like blatant advertisement Yashovardhan (talk) 17:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Rajeev Kathpalia

Rajeev Kathpalia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rajeev Kathpalia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR: No significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. A Google search found only this source which was published back in 2009, no new sources and no evidence to support his role in Dhoni: The Untold Story. I'm open to withdraw my nomination if anyone can provide some more independent reliable sources to support notability. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete I concur with GSS's assessment, and have said as much on the creator's talk page. I gave him a warning about autobiographies two days ago [1]. He ignored it, kept on working on Draft:Rajiv Kathpalia. I asked him twice (1, 2) to respond. No response. He has twice removed an autobiography tag from the article (1,2), despite having been told about writing autobiographies before and knows this is a real problem. The editor's pattern of edits have been strictly in support of Rajeev Kathpalia, demonstrating they are a Wikipedia:Single-purpose account. While these actions are not themselves reasons for deletion, they help illuminate the situation. As to the article itself, I have also attempted to inform the editor of the same concerns that GSS has raised. I noted this here on March 22, and again today. Outside of the one article from 2009, there is nothing to go on here. Thus, this is a failure of WP:GNG. Despite efforts, I can not verify through reliable sources that there was even a character of the name "Mihir" in the one movie this actor supposedly acted in. No such character is shown on our article here, nor on the imdb cast listing for this movie. So even if he did appear as this character, the character is so minor as to be effectively not worth mentioning. Thus, this is a failure of WP:NACTOR; the actor has had no significant roles of any kind. I believe this person, or a person acting on behalf of him, is attempting to promote themselves and use Wikipedia to do so. The article is an output of that, and has no basis for acceptability under Wikipedia standards. Like GSS, I'm willing to amend my recommendation if some reliable sources can be found. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. I must also concur with the rationale given; after getting the page creator to remove "Official account" from their username, it seems that it is the person promoting themselves. 331dot (talk) 17:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Holhuashi

Holhuashi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Holhuashi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unsourced. Seems like a hoax. RoCo(talk) 15:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Alpargatas S.A.

Alpargatas S.A. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Alpargatas S.A." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Promotional. Fails notability guidelines. No secondary sources to be found on the website. RoCo(talk) 15:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

CIO Digest

CIO Digest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "CIO Digest" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I am affiliated with Symantec, who publishes CIO Digest (the subject of the article). The article does not seem fit for an encyclopedia (promotional), especially the last two paragraphs. It is unlikely the publication is notable. It is likely this page was written by someone at the publication, who didn't realize their writing was promotional and inappropriate. Hopefully this AfD nomination will serve to assist in correcting that error. Best regards. CorporateM (Talk) 14:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Heart In Diamond

Heart In Diamond (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Heart In Diamond" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not meet WP:NORG. The 2 sources that mention the company are Forbes and Huffpost (that mention it in passing); Forbes contributors are notoriously unreliable as most have PR and business consultancy functions as does the author of the article that in fact only mentions this company in passing. Domdeparis (talk) 14:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Alina Rotaru (harpsichordist)

Alina Rotaru (harpsichordist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Alina Rotaru (harpsichordist)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Strike one against this is that it's an autobiography - not automatically disqualifying, of course, but still a red flag. Strike two, which is fatal to the article, is the lack of independent in-depth coverage, or anything suggesting the subject meets WP:NMUSIC. We have a bunch of sale pages ([2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]); some cruft ([9], [10]); [11]); a couple of self-published reviews ([12], [13]) and a pair of puff pieces that appeared in the same newspaper a week apart, largely duplicating their content ([14], [15]). Nothing here really indicates a notable musician, and the general scarcity of attention the subject has garnered in impartial sources means we too should not have an article about her. - Biruitorul Talk 14:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete Wikipedia is not a platform for people to advance their personal brand, but a place to cover people who have actually received indepdent source coverage. We have nothing more than sale sites and PR puff here. The article makes claims about wide recognition for the subject which would require actual indepdent sources to verify.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Jozeff

Jozeff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jozeff" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Article attempts to inherit notability from events the person was involved with, and sources located during WP:BEFORE search offer no evidence of individual notability. Improvement tags repeatedly removed by author without making any effort to address this issue. Exemplo347 (talk) 07:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 📞 contribs 14:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

TnT (professional wrestling)

TnT (professional wrestling) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "TnT (professional wrestling)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Individuals are notable, but team is not. Precedent for deletion of this sort of team article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelina Love and Winter. Nikki311 05:57, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki311 05:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 📞 contribs 14:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Kurt Franke

Kurt Franke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kurt Franke" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

An unremarkable Waffen-SS man. Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & significant RS coverage cannot be found: link.

No de.wiki article. Berger is a WP:QS author and is non RS for the purpose of establishing notability; please see this supplementary discussion of Berger & The Face of Courage at RSN permalink. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Probably delete -- We have an impressive list of medals, including one only awarded 631 times. That might make him notable, but we need some text from the citation as to what he did before I will accept he is notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:27, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 02:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
  • If the facts behind to Knight's Cross award and the Close Combat medal in Gold are presented then it would possibility meet notability; one cannot tell given the barebones presentation currently there. I don't have information to add on this soldier. Kierzek (talk) 13:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 📞 contribs 14:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Enzo Pineda

Enzo Pineda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Enzo Pineda" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No independent sources in the article. A search turned up a rather thin IMDb entry. Minor appearances in reality shows, on TV, and in films. The corresponding article in Tagalog Wiki supplies no evidence of notability. Fails WP:BIO. Narky Blert (talk) 22:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 02:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - Fails WP:NACTOR. A search for supporting references to establish notability turned up nothing beyond trivial mentions, and tabloid journalism. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 03:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - Most sources, from what I could find, are from unreliable sources or entertainment sites such as Starmometer and PEP (Wikipedia reliability unknown). However, he does appear to have been covered in some reliable sources, such as this one by the Standard (the Standard is a major newspaper in the Philippines, albeit not one of the "Big Three"). There's also this source from The Philippine Star (one of the Philippines' top three newspapers) and apparently some coverage by the Philippine Daily Inquirer (one of the other "Big Three" papers). His acting roles don't seem to be that big yet, but given the coverage I've found, he probably passes our notability guidelines, if only by the slimmest of margins. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 📞 contribs 14:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Meng Lee

Meng Lee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Meng Lee" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I can't find any evidence this person meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. She's been mentioned in a bunch of books about C++, but as far as I can gather, that's about it. Adam9007 (talk) 00:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete: No assertion of importance. Having written a book is hardly important. If for some reason this fails speedy, delete anyway as there is no in-depth coverage. Toddst1 (talk) 22:55, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment Keep Meng Lee has some well-cited publications according to Google Scholar. I can see a technical report with > 600 citations (which was instrumental in the development of the C++ Standard Template Library), one paper with > 200 citations, and another one with > 100 citations. She developed the original C++ Standard Template Library with Alexander Stepanov, and coauthored the first technical report on the STL, as well as a book published in 2000 that has over 100 citations. It's difficult to judge researchers working in R&Ds of private corporations solely on the basis of their publications since they publish very little (and mostly in the form of internal technical reports). However, in this case, the subject clearly passes WP:GNG. However, she appears to have stopped her research after 1992 or so. She doesn't qualify WP:PROF with just three papers, but she isn't a completely unknown researcher either.Stringy Acid (talk) 18:44, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 📞 contribs 14:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Vlad Holiday

Vlad Holiday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Vlad Holiday" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

There really doesn't appear to be any independent notability outside the subject's band. At best, this warrants a redirect to Born Cages. - Biruitorul Talk 13:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Lori Funk

Lori Funk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Lori Funk" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

While there are lots of hits for folks with this name, can't find any substantive coverage for this particular person. Fails WP:GNG, and obviously doesn't pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 13:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete: No significant roles and no coverage. Fails WP:ENT. SL93 (talk) 19:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Killing My Lobster

Killing My Lobster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Killing My Lobster" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A purely local comedy group. Nothing but local sources, and no evidence of notability outside the San Francisco Bay Area -- and I'm skeptical about even that level of notability. Calton | Talk 12:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete: In the previous AfD from 9+ years ago, the decision was to keep, but it seems like they really haven't gained any form of global notability since then. As mentioned, all of the sources are local, and it seems that most references to them are. I don't believe there is evidence that they are globally notable enough to garner their own article. bojo | talk 13:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Deb per A7. Burning Pillar (talk) 14:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)(non-admin closure)

Saswat saubhagya rout

Saswat saubhagya rout (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Saswat saubhagya rout" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unsourced, non-notable, no content except a date of birth. lovkal (talk) 11:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete WP:A7 - I've tagged the article. Exemplo347 (talk) 12:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Speedy Deleted as it unquestionably meets the criteria. Deb (talk) 12:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Jimfbleak under WP:G11. Burning Pillar (talk) 14:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)(non-admin closure)

Novotel Goa Resort & Spa, Goa

Novotel Goa Resort & Spa, Goa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Novotel Goa Resort & Spa, Goa" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Blatant promotion/advertising lovkal (talk) 11:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete WP:G11 Tagged the article. Exemplo347 (talk) 12:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete for unambiguous advertising. Creator has a history of creating non-encyclopedic articles and this is yet another example. Ajf773 (talk) 12:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The Winds of Marble Arch and Other Stories: A Connie Willis Compendium

The Winds of Marble Arch and Other Stories: A Connie Willis Compendium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The Winds of Marble Arch and Other Stories: A Connie Willis Compendium" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Kinda hard to do Before on a compendium of short stories, but I can't see a good reason why this one is notable. I can't find any reviews or mentions or anything much beyond booksellers JMWt (talk) 10:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete: Seconding original notions. bojo | talk 13:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete: I found no coverage. Not even one single review. Fails WP:BK. SL93 (talk) 19:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Non è mai Passato

Non è mai Passato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Non è mai Passato" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No evidence indicated or found that this meets notability guidelines for films or anything else. Low budget short film, yet to be released (reportedly due December 2017), so WP:CRYSTAL as well. Prodded but PROD removed by IP editor. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 10:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete: I agree with both of the original points. bojo | talk 13:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep: Some actors of the short film are present on the site "Malta Film Commission" and the short is on IMDb ; I am the creator of the page, if you want I'll add information/details --Bussival (talk) 13:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

WWE Talking Smack

WWE Talking Smack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "WWE Talking Smack" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:GNG. WWE Network post-show for SmackDown-branded pay-per-view events. Not notable in its own right. Copy-pasted from Pro Wrestling Wikia. Nickag989talk 09:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nickag989talk 09:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

N P Suhaid

N P Suhaid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "N P Suhaid" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR: Does not appear to be a notable person. A Google search for "N P Suhaid" or "Kukku" found nothing that establishes notability. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. Entirely non-notable BLP. Ajf773 (talk) 12:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete: Non-notable BLP. bojo | talk 13:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete: Even a Google search only has facebook pages about him. Fails BIO and NACTOR. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Search Engine Optimization, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Search Engine Optimization, Inc." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable company with a high risk of being self-promotion. Of the references given, most are either self-published, online rankings, or (at best) mention the subject in passing (e.g., one mention in a list of fast-growing companies in San Diego). While it's difficult to search for this company's name, nothing else prominent from independent, reliable sources appears to come up. In the absence of clear and convincing evidence of notability, I'm inclined to lean toward the risk of advertising being too high. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 09:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Delete Promotional piece, this page looks like a company description on its website. If there is truly notability, then writing a new good article will probably not take more time than converting this into a good article.Burning Pillar (talk) 12:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

ClearDB Documenter

ClearDB Documenter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "ClearDB Documenter" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No evidence this software is notable. Lack of any references to independent reliable sources. I looked for references myself in Google News, Google Books, Google Scholar, could find nothing. Most of what a web search turns up is just the vendor's own website, also some hits on sites with low threshold for inclusion (such as download.cnet.com and software.informer.com) and some reseller websites (componentsource.com), but nothing which is high quality and independent of the vendor to indicate that this software is notable. SJK (talk) 09:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SJK (talk) 09:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Answer: Thank you for bringing this up. I am working on the issues in the ClearDB Documenter article and will consider all your remarks. Scott tiger 2002 (talk) 14:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Celebrate Fairfax!

Celebrate Fairfax! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Celebrate Fairfax!" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I could only find insignificant local coverage. Fails WP:N. It was also created by a user with the same username as this article. SL93 (talk) 09:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 09:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Abraham: The Friend of God

Abraham: The Friend of God (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Abraham: The Friend of God" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I found no significant coverage for this film. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 09:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 09:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 09:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 09:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

3D prostate-targeted treatment

3D prostate-targeted treatment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "3D prostate-targeted treatment" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This appears to be a marketing name for a particular technique that has been the subject of a PR blitz recently (e.g. [16]). In the absence of notability of this particular form of treatment, it's just advertising a particular doctor's practice. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 08:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete - It's never a good sign when you have the word "natural" twice in the first sentence of an article...or...really the first sentence of anything for that matter. But besides that, not much out there besides press releases, and literally nothing on g.scholar. Fringe COI promotionalism. Nuke on sight. TimothyJosephWood 15:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - fails WP:MEDRS. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

No Mercy (professional wrestling)

No Mercy (professional wrestling) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "No Mercy (professional wrestling)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article about a wrestling stable in a minor independent promotion created by a now-banned sockpuppet. All sources appear to be wrestling blogs and WP:BEFORE does not disclose WP:RS for this grouping. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:28, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:43, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 02:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG. Nikki311 06:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 08:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Parvardigar (Pete Townshend song)

Parvardigar (Pete Townshend song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Parvardigar (Pete Townshend song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not notable. Lacks coverage independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Redirect to I Am (Pete Townshend album). I don't have access to the sources listed in the article. If those have significant coverage it could change my opinion. Searching found nothing helpful. Lacks coverage needed for a separate article. WP:NSONG suggests redirecting to the album. Gab4gab (talk) 18:57, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 08:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. We shouldn't keep redirects from such convoluted titles. The entry at Parvardigar (disambiguation) will suffice if anyone's searching for it. --Michig (talk) 09:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Tourism in Ahmedabad

Tourism in Ahmedabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Tourism in Ahmedabad" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

WP:NOTTRAVEL. Obvious tourist brochure content. Wikipedia is not the Lonely Planet. Ajf773 (talk) 06:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 07:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 07:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - clearly not an encyclopaedia article Spiderone 12:25, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Tourism in Gujarat. This could be cleaned up and properly sourced like many other tourism in city articles, but redirect for now.Charles (talk) 11:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:13, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is relisted to gain a clearer consensus on whether the close should be a delete or a redirect, as those are the two current options. Other opinions are welcome as well.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 18:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 08:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment as the nominator - this AfD has been relisted enough times now. I give preference to redirect as per User:Charlesdrakew. If the article is ever recreated it can also be nominated again in another AfD should the content continue to be non-compliant. Ajf773 (talk) 12:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Hong Kong Island United

Hong Kong Island United (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hong Kong Island United" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not notable enough to have article. GreenCricket (talk) 08:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Francis Brabazon

AfDs for this article:
    Francis Brabazon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Francis Brabazon" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Not notable, badly refed like this deleted page [17] SaintAviator lets talk 03:50, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:14, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:14, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:14, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. SaintAviator lets talk 23:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
    • delete fails WP:AUTHOR. writing a lot of non notable books doesn't add to notability. no major awards for himself or his books. LibStar (talk) 02:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep. Adding to the above book (reviewed in Journal for the Academic Study of Religion, Vol 18, No 1 (2005)[19]) (probobly started life as a phd thesis [20]). ABC's Radio National broadcast a show about him [21]. National Library of Australia has a "book" of Biographical cuttings on Francis Brabazon, containing one or more cuttings from newspapers or journals [22]. State Library Victoria has similar [23]. There is another book about him, The water carrier : a mosaic of the poet, Francis Brabazon by Robert Rouse [24]. AustLit shows 3 works about him and 10 about his work [25]. Includes Francis Brabazon : A New Measure in Modern Australian Poetry Ross Keating , 1996 criticism — Appears in: Religion, Literature and the Arts : Conference Proceedings [1996]; (p. 185-193). Other articles appear in publications such as Australien zwischen Europa und Asien, 1993, The Bulletin, 1964, Australian Book Review, 1963, Quadrant, 1958, Meanjin, 1957 and 1958, The Sydney Morning Herald, 1957 and Walkabout, 1954. Also an article in Sydney Studies in Religion [26]. Enough coverage for notability. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment Robert Rouse was a Baba follower. [27] His book was self published by funds from Bill Le Page, by deesh Books, now gone as a publisher. Le Pages page was deleted last week. He is also a Baba follower [28] as is Ross Keating who is Le pages son in law [29]. Look for this, 'Jenny ( married Ross Keating )' here [30] All Brabazons books are published by Baba Followers i.e Meher Baba Foundation Australia, Sheriar Press, Beacon Hill Publishing. Also note, there are No references in this article, none whatsoever. The reading list are all Baba followers. The Phd the above poster mentions early in the first 2 links is none other than Ross Keating. Who also does the Radio show in the next link. So all of these three supporting points are one man, Keating, pushing his self published book. The next point the newspaper cuttings includes Brabazons obituary. Hardly notable, Ancestry.com is packed with that info about just about everyone from that time. The next point was Rouse, covered above. The last supporting point by the above poster is our main man, Keating, again, who else. These supporting points are almost all Ross Keating. Duffbeerforme, did you not see that? SaintAviator lets talk 20:41, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
    "These supporting points are almost all Ross Keating." Well the ones you addressed are. How about the others that you skipped. They form the majority of sources. Australien zwischen Europa und Asien, 1993, The Bulletin, 1964, Australian Book Review, 1963, Quadrant, 1958, Meanjin, 1957 and 1958, The Sydney Morning Herald, 1957 and Walkabout, 1954. No by Keating.
    ABC source is published by ABC, a major reputable publisher.
    Yes the Bill Le Page page was bad and should have been deleted but this one is not about him.
    "The next point the newspaper cuttings includes Brabazons obituary." Does it? What else does it contain? Obits are common but the NLA does not collect all obits in a "book" dedicated to random individuals. They are not indiscriminate.
    Keatings books self published? Could be, does not seem to be a regular publisher. Big point against it. In it's favour, Keating is not just a random follower, he is "is a senior lecturer in the School of Education at the Australian Catholic University." and the book has been independently reviewed. Might not be independent enough for GNG but Brabazon passes without it.
    "Also note, there are No references in this article, none whatsoever." At the moment no, but over the years it has had. But more important sources exist and are verifiable. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:33, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    A comment on content. I say he passes gng on the strength of those sources from AustLit. Those sources are mostly reviews of his books of poetry. They are not about his devotion to Baba The relative weight given to what is covered needs to reflect the sourcing. Outside of Baba devotion sources there is reviews of his poetry so Wikipedia should reflect that poetry. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    The others I skipped were not linked / refed. They dont count. Sadly Im not going to run around finding your links. Keating is self published. Re no refs, Wikipedia protocol is clear, not refs, delete. Hes not notable enough. Any refs that exist to provide the meat of the article are devotional self published. It looks like the picture is dodgy too, [31] SaintAviator lets talk 21:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    Have a read of WP:OFFLINE. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:24, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 08:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Weak delete. It does seem that the subject has been promoted by some people with family (?) COI, but their motivations don't matter that much. Regardless her reasons, Ross Keating managed to publish several academic works about the subject. That said, the sources are few, and kind of stretched. The point to keep in mind is that not all poets are notable, and this bio does seem to fail WP:CREATIVE. No awards, no coverage except one (?) dedicated fan-scholar or so. I am afraid he is not an encyclopedic material, not until more scholars, journalists or such become interested in him and publish a bit more about him. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:38, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
      • User:Piotrus. You state that beyond Keating there is no coverage. What about the reviews of Brabazons work that were published in Australien zwischen Europa und Asien, 1993, The Bulletin, 1964, Australian Book Review, 1963, Quadrant, 1958, Meanjin, 1957 and 1958, The Sydney Morning Herald, 1957 and Walkabout, 1954. None of those are by Keating. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    @Piotrus:. They were found on AustLit. If logged in you get a Biography here and a list of Works About Their Works here. This bapge has the works titles, Author, brief not on what it is and where it appears (with Publication, Date, volume details, pages).
    eg. Untitled Charles Higham , 1957 review
    — Appears in: The Sydney Morning Herald , 26 January 1957; (p. 12)
    — Review of The Hexagon Hal Porter 1956 selected work poetry ; Seven Stars to Morning Francis Brabazon 1956 selected work poetry
    I don't know how much should be copied from AustLit given that is a subscription service.
    Contents are mostly reviews of his books, Proletarians-Transition * 2, The East-West Gathering * 2, Cantos of Wandering * 2, Seven Stars to Morning * 2. Others are more general "criticism".
    Also could you consider the Biographical cuttings on him available in at least two major libraries. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:28, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
            • @Duffbeerforme: Since unfortunately I cannot log in, I cannot express my opinion on those sources beyond "they are promising". Regarding reproduction, well, I stand by "knowledge should be free", and add that I have seen on a number of occasion people providing screenshots of otherwise locked content here (of course, we cannot upload them to wiki servers, but there's a ton of free hosts out there). If you have qualms about that, that's fine, but being able to show such screenshots could strengthen the keep side's argument significantly. Seeing is believing, etc. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Checking Poet lists Hes not listed as a famous Australian poet here [32] or here [33] or here [34]. Quite an extensive list. SaintAviator lets talk 03:47, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete. Not notable. Dazedbythebell (talk) 23:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • For those that want to ignore offline sourcing perhaps have a look at Rumi - Past and Present, East and West, by Franklin D. Lewis (Oneworld Publications) [35] and Meanjin, Volume 17, Issue 72 [36] [37] (1958, see above. "Cantos of Wandering is one of the most curious books of pseudo-poetry ever published in Australia.") and another Meanjin [38]. And what may convince everyone of notability, the New Oxford Book of Australian Verse from Oxford University Press includes him [39]. (other minor snippetts [40] [41] [42]). duffbeerforme (talk) 10:28, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Reply The link above for the 'New Oxford Book of Australian Verse' lists his name on this article being discussed for deletion. A self fulfilling loop. A Google search of the title 'Rumi - Past and Present, East and West' plus Brabazon gets 444,000 hits with no Brabazon mentioned. So he has never been discussed online in relation to this book. Cantos of wandering was published by Beacon Hill Press owned by Ross Keatings father in law, Bill Le Page. So self published. Your points in support are going round in circles, revolving around the Keating / Le Page axis of fan boy self publishing. His real notability is association with Meher Baba. The question is, is that enough? And the Elephant in the room is his article has No references, none at all. Why are we even discussing this? SaintAviator lets talk 21:35, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
    Your underhanded attempts to ignore or downplay provided evidence is getting worse.
    "The link above for the 'New Oxford Book of Australian Verse' lists his name on this article being discussed for deletion. A self fulfilling loop." Nope, just another red herring from you. The link above [43] has nothing to do with Wikipedia. That book was published in 1986, well before Wikipedia started.
    You claim to have run a google search and got "no Brabazon mentioned". (You looked through all 44,000 claimed hits did you?) Let's see what a real search gets.
    Let's try as you write it above. 'Rumi - Past and Present, East and West' Brabazon [44] gets 7,300 results, the 3rd one (google books) includes Brabazon. 7 of the first 10 do but some are false hits due to the lack of quote marks.
    Let's try with quote marks "Rumi - Past and Present, East and West" Brabazon [45] gets 7 results, the first one (google books) clearly includes Brabazon.
    But why even try a google search? I've already provided the relevant link.
    "So he has never been discussed online in relation to this book." How is that relevent? Another red herring from you. He was discussed in the book.
    Cantos of Wandering "self published." How is that relevent? Another red herring from you. Self published books can get reviewed too.
    None of the points I just made above revolve around Keating or Le Page so just another red herring from you.
    "His real notability is association with Meher Baba." Says who? Another red herring from you. His real notability is from reviews and critisisms of his work.
    "And the Elephant in the room is his article has No references, none at all." Another red herring from you. This afd is about the notability of Brabazon, not about the current state of the article. Why does it have no "references" at the moment? here it has 23 listed (but many are repeats). Someone must of removed them. Are the sources available, clearly yes and thats the relevant thing. Are there any sources in the article, yes, the publications and further reading are all sources even if they don't help with notability.
    "Why are we even discussing this?" Because you choose not to listen.
    Your strawman is looking very feeble. And you are still ignoring the offline sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:15, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

    This is the Elephant Im talking about. [46] Offline sources are OK BTW, I have used them too, but as stated above they need to be presented here properly, if you do it would trump the Google issue SaintAviator lets talk 21:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

    And now I've added a reference to the article so your imaginary elephant has left the room. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
    You're starting to be uncivil, here, 'Your underhanded attempts' and directly above, dont. SaintAviator lets talk 21:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
    If you don't like that picture, how about this one (he is bottom right)? duffbeerforme (talk) 03:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
    Its not a matter of like its about copyright. Again youre taking it to the personal. The editor who posted that picture was contacted about a copyright query and since then has commented above with a 'Delete' re the article. BTW as it happens I dont like that new picture. SaintAviator lets talk 21:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Sidney Nolan: A Life [47] has a little bit more. More snippetts in Modern Love: The Lives of John and Sunday Reed [48] duffbeerforme (talk) 03:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
    Snippett. def. A bit, scrap, or morsel. Its four deletes to one keep. Hes just not notable enough. I put him on this page [49] where there are 4 other Meher Baba affiliated pages you, Duffbeerforme, nominated for deletion, which I support BTW. Brabazon was a dedicated Meher Baba follower. SaintAviator lets talk 23:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakrtalk / 08:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Feyisetan Asagidigbi

    Feyisetan Asagidigbi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Feyisetan Asagidigbi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Seems to be too early: If I am right, he never played in a fully professional league and thus fails WP:NFOOTY. There is some coverage, but, as far as I am concerned, not yet on the level we require to pass WP:GNG. Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Previously (2016 and 2017) two times PRODded and deleted.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Portland Women March Against Hate

    Portland Women March Against Hate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Portland Women March Against Hate" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Minor protest with only local news coverage. — JFG talk 07:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Keep, but move to March Against Hate and expand the article's scope to include Seattle (source, source, source), San Antonio (source, source, Stevens Point (source), Pittsburgh (source), etc. I already had plans to expand the scope of this article beyond just Portland, but I seem to never be given more than a couple hours to work on an article before it's nominated for deletion. User:JFG, it would be really helpful if you'd be willing to let articles develop, or express your concerns on the talk page before immediately nominating every Trump-related article being created. But, here we are, so I hope editors will take time to consider this article expansion instead of voting to merge/delete solely based on this Portland content. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    If you want to develop articles before putting them out there, use the Draft space. This will avoid drama. Note that I did support you when you recently expanded an article that had been quickly pushed to AfD. However, when you create weaker stubs in article space, you are setting yourself up for criticism. — JFG talk 18:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Alright, well, it would have been nice to have more time to work on the article before AfD, because now I can't move the page and expand its scope until this discussion ends. This could have been solved by simply moving the page or posting a note on the article's talk page. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Note: I would move the page and start expanding the article's scope now, but I understand I should not move the article during an AfD discussion. If this is not true, please let me know and I'll get to work! Thanks. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    People's Climate Mobilization

    People's Climate Mobilization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "People's Climate Mobilization" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Coverage of the event does not go beyond announcements. Wikipedia is not a WP:SOAPBOX for political activism. — JFG talk 07:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Snow Keep, as article creator. This event is a month away. Let the article snowball, then we can revisit again very soon. There is plenty of coverage and it is likely the article would just need to be recreated in a couple weeks. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete WP:TOOSOON. May be a flop and can be easily restored if it turns out to be notable. Number 57 19:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Larrikins (film)

    Larrikins (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Larrikins (film)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    The film was canceled. Fails WP:NFF. Koala15 (talk) 07:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Nora Ekberg

    Nora Ekberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Nora Ekberg" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Not notable outside of the song "I'm an Albatraoz" and her older brother AronChupa. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep - The song charted. Became a global hit. She seemingly has released a follow-up single. For me this passes WP:GNG and MUSIC.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep - She's branded as Little Sis Nora, and also notable therefore. Anyway, my opinion might be biased, considering I created the article. RoCo(talk) 10:50, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Redirect to the article about the song, in which she is currently mentioned. No independent notability per WP:ENT or WP:GNG. --bonadea contributions talk 08:30, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Ferra Ferri

    Ferra Ferri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Ferra Ferri" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Non-notable film fails to pass general notability guidlines. The article was deleted recently after the expiration of prod. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:41, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 18:28, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Shyheim

    Shyheim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Shyheim" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Fails WP:MUSICBIO. One charted song, and no awards or nominations. Unable to locate any secondary sources to support notability as a musician, although much has been published about his criminal conviction. This should not, however, support an article per WP:PERP. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    Strong Keep, obviously notable and subject has an album which is notable itself and has an article. The article could be improved yes, but the subject was also a B-list actor and a featured artist on numerous albums and singles for over a decade. Nothing gained and the encyclopedia is not improved by this deletion. Article has numerous inbound and outbound links. Some articles are shorter than others and not every single piece of valuable information is going to be a GA. Spurious deletion motion vigorously opposed. JesseRafe (talk) 14:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Delete, fails WP:MUSICBIO. The only three citations are to his vehicular homicide. Also fails Wikipedia:CRIME. Waters.Justin (talk) 23:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Update: Please look at the additional links added to reference his musical career and film career, each notable. He passes #s 1, 5, and 11 before the recent edits anyway, so the claims of failing WP:MUSICBIO previously were unfounded. As an actor he has had multiple roles in major motion pictures and was a prominent recurring star on a long-running primetime major network television show, which passes the simple muster for WP:ENTERTAINER. This whole motion to delete is poorly founded. Look at how many inbound links there are to this page about this obviously notable individual! Why, instead of seeing a page that's not great is it your impulse to delete it rather than repair it? JesseRafe (talk) 13:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 18:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. JesseRafe (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. JesseRafe (talk) 18:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • EXTREMELY STRONG KEEP. Very notable rapper. Velociraptor888 08:56, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete - not notable! --Temp87 (talk) 13:59, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
      • ^This account seems to only exist to vote in deletion discussions and makes no attempt at pointing to policy or guidelines. JesseRafe (talk) 14:08, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
        • Is having an account just for voting on things not allowed on Wikipedia? --Temp87 (talk) 14:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
          • The problem is in every deletion/move/merge discussion you've weighed in on you've cited zero policy to back up your positions just flying by your whims. Please consult the welcome links on your talk page for some info about meaningful contributions to the encyclopedia you could make so that your comments in these back page discussions will be more grounded in policy. JesseRafe (talk) 13:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Strong keep. One charted song is all an artist needs if the chart meets the notability guidelines. On And On - his 1994 single - made #89 on the Billboard Hot 100. His debut album made #52 on the Billboard 200, and the follow up made #63. Shyheim has clearly had a long career in the spotlight and while not A-list, his collective achievements would qualify him for an article even without these positions. KaisaL (talk) 05:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Kuntal Chakraborty

    Kuntal Chakraborty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Kuntal Chakraborty" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Non-notable journalist. Winged Blades Godric 11:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Winged Blades Godric 11:20, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:11, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 18:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Khem Raj Bhardwaj

    Khem Raj Bhardwaj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Khem Raj Bhardwaj" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    The subjects is notable only for one event and I failed to find any significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources to pass general notability guidelines. I redirected the article to MTV Love School earlier but the author reverted it back few times so I'm bringing this here instead of just redirecting back again so that the decision will stick. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:35, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 18:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Death & Taxes (film)

    Death & Taxes (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Death & Taxes (film)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Non-notable film, written and directed by non-notable documentarian Orange Mike | Talk 01:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment: I think that this could possibly serve as a redirect to the disambiguation page Death & Taxes. It has a review from Variety so it does at least warrant a mention on the page for Gordon Kahl, which means that a general mention could be left on the disambiguation page that mentions that Kahl had a documentary created about him. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:17, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Redirect to Death & Taxes and remove the in-WP links, as this would just create a circular redirect. I've linked to Kahl's entry at the disambiguation page, so removing the links would be the only thing left to do. I'd recommend leaving the history intact just in case more sourcing becomes available. Technically the two reviews can be enough to pass NFILM, but the overall information here is so brief that there's not much here that couldn't be already listed at Kahl's page. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Redirect or delete?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 18:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • My thought was to make this a redirect to Death_&_Taxes#Film, where this film is listed alongside the note "Death and Taxes, title of a fictional book written by one of the characters in Stranger than Fiction". There's enough coverage to justify this documentary being mentioned somewhere, just maybe not its own page. It's listed in the media section of the Kahl article, so it'd warrant being listed at the larger disambiguation page. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 21:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep The Variety and Billboard reviews found by Tokyogirl79 demonstrate that Death & Taxes passes Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. I think readers are best served by a standalone article that discusses the film's synopsis and reception. A merge of the entire synopsis and reception sections to Gordon Kahl would be undue weight so some information would have to be trimmed even though I consider all the information pertinent and useful for readers. Cunard (talk) 05:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep. It was brought here for notability; "Technically the two reviews can be enough to pass NFILM" (user:Tokyogirl79) so it's notable. May be a good WP:MERGE candidate but that could be discussed in the normal way. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Glen Power

    Glen Power (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Glen Power" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Should be a redirect to The Script, but some editors insist on reverting to uncited, or poorly cited, article about his musician who has no indication of his own notability outside of the band. Onel5969 TT me 16:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Merge and redirect per nom. WP:MERGEREASON suggests that "If a page is very short and is unlikely to be expanded within a reasonable amount of time, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic". This article has been little more than an (uncited) one-liner for nearly 5 years. If it hasn't been expanded with that period (where 5 years is objectively a "reasonable amount of time"), then it seems to meet the criteria for merge/redirect. Guliolopez (talk) 12:22, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    RuPaul's Drag Race Fashion Photo RuView

    RuPaul's Drag Race Fashion Photo RuView (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "RuPaul's Drag Race Fashion Photo RuView" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    As much as I love this webseries, it does not have enough significant coverage in reliable, third-part sources to warrant an article. Aoba47 (talk) 16:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 16:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 16:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete: I found no reliable sources. SL93 (talk) 22:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Burak Davutoğlu

    Burak Davutoğlu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Burak Davutoğlu" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Actor who doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Provided sources (entirely in Turkish--evaluation based on machine translation) are entirely lists of credits, iMDB-type listings and passing mentions, with no articles found specifically about him. No idea about notability of claimed awards. Corresponding article on tr.wiki is by the same author with the same material and sourcing. --Finngall talk 15:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk 15:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk 15:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk 15:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete a non-notable actor. We need actual indepth mention of people, not just mentions in passing to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:28, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment - Author has added several more references since the discussion period began, but they're still passing mentions or do not mention the subject at all. My assessment hasn't changed. --Finngall talk 20:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep Hi, firstly thanks to everyone who contributed to the article. Since the page was created, it has evolved as you see and has been adapted to Wikipedia. (in my opinion) and also, maybe because of the language, I think I may try to help you on evaluation by underlining and explaining some points.


    Why "the actor who does appear to meet" WP:GNG?

    He already has a Wikipedia article authorised in Turkish. Now, in the last case of this article, Engllish one is much more well-rounded than the Turkish one.

    “General notability guideline” “If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.” “Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, and in any language.”

    To notice this, we should view the sources. So what kind of sources used here? Why they are suitable? In the article, in 73 source, (with the secondary sources ) some of the sources are;

    ibb.gov.tr/sites/sehirtiyatrolari : Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality City Theaters official web site which is a theater institution founded in 1914 under the name Darulbedayi-i. Also, there are to biggest theater institution in Turkey, one of it Turkish State Theatres and the other one is this. (Also have information in French Wikipedia)

    Below the web sites used as souces are mainstream media newspapers in Turkey.

    Below the web sites and internal links used as souces are mainstream media TV Channels in Turkey.

    Sources in Englis:

    And the other sources are focused on art and theater in Turkey.

    "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions”

    (You could find the details of these entries in the article)

    • He’s the permanent actor of an important institute such as Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality City Theaters.
    • He’s the instructor of a professional institute Dialog Anlatım iletişim, which is certified by the Ministry of National Education.
    • He staged as a lead actor on an open-air theater which has 4000 audience capacity.
    • He staged also at the international festivals.
    • He staged as a lead actor at lots of his plays. (Could search via characters)
    • He was displayed on the cover of the theater magazine that's being distributing all around Turkey.
    • He has been one of the founders of cinema actors' professional association BIROY, which is an association to monitor, collect and distribute the copyright of the actors in the audiovisual field.
    • His name with his role, took place in a philosophy professor doctor’s academic article.
    • His TV dramas displayed on mainstream chanels, also in 17 countries in the world. In this TV dramas, some of them he was the lead actor or he shared the roles with lead artists (You could watch the filmography video)

    'Burak Davutoğlu' doesn't use social media but the artists' followers number here whom he shared near roles (like close friend, lover, brother, father, son...)

    • Pınar Altuğ Atacan: 899G followers
    • Şevval Sam: 294G followers
    • Beren Saat: 271G followers
    • Emre Kınay: 221G followers
    • Deniz Çakır: 60,6G followers

    Acording to this point, and if it’s possible if I have chance, I will improve more the article and the other articles connected by the time.

    Greetings,

    Frock~trwiki (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:01, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Comment - First, even if it were his own Twitter account that had 900k followers, it would be irrelevant--the accounts of these others mean even less. The article on the Turkish Wiki means nothing, as different wikis operate independently and can have widely varying standards for inclusion.
    Looking at the first several listed references in detail:
    1. Wikipedia is not a reliable source, and the article in question does not mention the subject.
    2. Does not mention the subject.
    3. Does not mention the subject.
    4. Does not mention the subject.
    5. Does not mention the subject.
    6. Does not mention the subject.
    7. Passing mention.
    8. Does not mention the subject.
    9. Does not mention the subject.
    10. Passing mention.
    I haven't looked closely at the most recent batch of additions, but when I looked at the first couple of sets of references, there was nothing but irrelevant links, mentions in cast lists, other passing mentions, and nothing more substantial than a sentence or two about his performance as part of a larger theater review. There are no articles specifically about him, and nowhere is there the depth of coverage about him and his career which is required for the sourcing of a proper encyclopedia article about him. You could include a hundred more references like the ones provided so far, and it still would not add up to satisfy the standard of substantial coverage in reliable sources which we normally ask for. --Finngall talk 22:50, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep It seems a satisfiying article. Enough notable sources and information. Biggest channels and media, international works and official sources. Sources with photographs, videos, texts, internal and external links ect. It contents many notable substances.SPEEDY85 (talk) 05:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC) SPEEDY85 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
    • Keep The article has too many sources but there are enough reliable, verifiable and accessible sources defining the subject especially in it’s own language. It sens notable. İnancoskay (talk) 23 March 2017 İnancoskay (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
    • Keep The actor who has mentioned in this article -Burak Davutoglu- has actullay a notable actor, especially for theater lovers. Since he is not as popular as the actors in well-known TV shows, not everybody knows about him. The references seem reliable sources include public and private institutions and non-governmental organizations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.101.13.136 (talk) 10:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC) 85.101.13.136 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
    • Keep In my opinion this article is suitable and notable. 24 March 2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.252.164.31 (talk) 21:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC) 212.252.164.31 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
    • Keep In my opinion article has sufficient information. Article seems reliable and gives details information about Burak Davutoğlu — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.180.96.192 (talk) 05:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: I smell a lot of sockpuppetry.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep The article has far too many sources but there are enough reliable, verifiable and accessible sources defining the subject, especially in French and Turkish. English grammar could be improved, but that is not a reason for deletion.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 12:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Paige Brooks

    Paige Brooks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Paige Brooks" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Looking behind the issues the article has the subject appears not to meet (WP:BIO and/ WP:GNG.. Notability is claimed based on a vast array of entertainment & pageant roles but none of her acting roles appear major and a search of Google, Google News and Newspapers.com is failing to provide any reliable source material indicating significant coverage. The name is somewhat generic so I also searched with combinations of Miss Alabama USA, Miss USA, Price is Right and Men in Black but still failed to find anything. Admittedly given the timeframe she was most active it is unlikely there would be much on Google now but I might have expected something to show up in the Newspapers.com archive. In short, does not appear to meet criteria for inclusion. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 13:54, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Weak Keep -- AfD's have been rejected on article subjects with less notability, e.g. Busty Heart, so it's hard to make a case for deleting this one. The PROMO and PEACOCK stuff needs to be removed or heavily modified, however. DoctorJoeE review transgressions/talk to me! 22:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
      By the same reasoning, a lot of articles on pageant titleholders with some post-pageant career stuff like this have been deleted with far more in the way of WP:RS material. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 02:57, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

    It seems I have unintentionally created quite an uproar here. I just want to take this opportunity to straighten out a few misconceptions and issues.

    Firstly, I am Ms. Brooks' biggest fan!

    I do not work for PaigeBrooks.com and the Paige Brooks article that I created 10 years ago is in no way affiliated with PaigeBrooks.com. I created it because I thought it was appropriate for this forum due to her level of recognition and honors.

    Ms. Brooks' management team has been very kind to allow me to post photos, awards, etc. with their permission, when I asked. If you have any questions or want to confirm this information that I am providing, you can contact them. They are very nice. I contact them through the email address that is publicly available on the official website.

    I am certainly and obviously not an expert at Wikipedia (this is the only Wikipedia article that I have ever done). I am not at all familiar with the guidelines and hope this is the correct way to get in touch with other users and administrators who have been taking issue of late.

    Only now, after a recent update, have I realized that the manner in which I originally wrote the article and subsequent updates are not completely within the guidelines of your community. Luckily, through the years, I can see some of your experienced Wikipedia users have corrected my many mistakes and vastly improved the article.

    The newest improvements are especially impressive. After 10 years of the article having my incorrect-for-Wikipedia writing style, I am happy to see that it meets the Wikipedia standards now.

    I want to apologize for any previous, although unintended, guideline missteps. I never meant to upset anyone, although I am afraid some of my actions may have done so. I did not realize that those actions were breaking the rules. Most importantly, I do not want my mistakes to reflect on Ms. Brooks in any way.

    I hope this note helps clarify things and that the article can continue to be included in Wikipedia now that it has been so vastly changed and improved, despite my inadequacies at creating and editing. Even after a decade, it is never too late to get things right. :)

    I vote to keep the Paige Brooks article with the current, existing improvements.

    Thank you for your understanding. missalusa (talk · contribs)

    • Redirect as mentioned above; rather clear-cut case of WP:BLP1E. Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep I have begun a basic rewrite of this article. I trimmed out most of the primary sources, and found new better references which I added to the article. Much information that was not present in cited sources has been removed. Feel free to add back anything which can be sourced to a reliable source. At thos time the article has the following sources:
    • USA/Teen USA USA Pageants". Miss Alabama USA/Teen USA USA Pageants. February 15, 2014. Retrieved March 21, 2017
    • "Paige Brooks". Paige Brooks (in Spanish). Retrieved March 21, 2017.
    • Press, D. (2004). Your Modeling Career: You Don't Have to Be a Superstar to Succeed. Allworth Press. p. 251. ISBN 978-1-58115-986-8. Retrieved March 21, 2017.
    • "The Price is Right Models Gallery: 2001 Model Search » Paige Brooks". The Price is Right Models Gallery. Retrieved March 21, 2017.
    • Willis, J.; Monush, B. (2004). Screen World 2003. John Willis Screen World. Hal Leonard. p. 80. ISBN 978-1-55783-526-0. Retrieved March 21, 2017.
    • Pignataro, Anthony (July 4, 2002). "Well-Respected". OC Weekly. Retrieved March 21, 2017.
    • "IMDb Salutes Hollywood Blondes". IMDb. September 24, 2014. Retrieved March 21, 2017.
    • "L'Vegue Magazine Aug 2016 issue". issuu. August 17, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2017.

    With all these sources including books, articles, and online sources the article subject passes WP:GNG, and has crossed the threshold of notability. This is not a one event situation since she has done several other reported and discussed things since her pageant win, including a named role in a major film, a continued role on popular tv show price is right, as well as being voted top 25 in vegas, plus the minor imdb award. I will continue to research her but @PageantUpdater you were right, many of the citations were misleading and did not verify statements in the article. Antonioatrylia (talk) 13:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

      • All these sources are either passing mentions or extremely unreliable. See our reliable sourcing guidelines. Prevan (talk) 13:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
      • Comment Agree with Prevan. Antionioatrylia has done an amazing job transforming the article but I feel it only lays more bare the paucity of significant coverage in reliable sources. One is a listing of all Miss Alabama USA titleholders from the official website, two are little more than image galleries, she does get a brief mention in one article but it's passing at best. As for the book references, I think there's good reason to question whether they even support what they've been cited for given the issues with many of the other citations. The most promising is the magazine but that again is just a brief mention in a list of "25 hottest people" which surely can't get her past GNG. BIO1E isn't at play here, I've always been firm in my opinion that these bios are about more than one event (and even more so here given the but part in Men in Black & appearing on Price is Right) but GNG just isn't met. Same conclusion I made when I nominated the article and hunted for any other coverage. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 14:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
    Comment Arguing that the book references might be questionable given the issues with many other citations, PageantUpdater said, there's good reason to question whether they even support what they've been cited for given the issues with many of the other citations. I can assure you that I read the source materials, and there is no questionability at all. It seems a poor argument and failing to show AGF to even make such a statement. Maybe try reading the sources yourself. I stand by my discussion points and my !vote in this matter. Antonioatrylia (talk) 15:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
    Hi Antonioatrylia, I only suggested that because when I click the links to "Your Modeling Career: You Don't Have to Be a Superstar to Succeed" and "Screen World 2003" they both only show me the front cover and not the inside of the book. I'm curious as to how you were able to read the source materials, because I would be interested in doing the same? As you are well aware we've had to remove references from the article because, in your own words we've had to remove references because they don't cover what they are supposed to be referencing, eg "information statement not verified or even mentioned in reference". My point was simply that it's frustrating we can't get inside the books to confirm whether the information that's being sourced to that material is actually contained within it. That's a separate issue to my belief that none of the source material remaining or available on Google and a number of reference sites show significant coverage in reliable sources. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 22:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC

    Not sure which browser you are using or what @PageantUpdater. The model book by D Press had a 3 1/2 to 4 page article. Even if it says there is no ebook availABLE, if you do sequential searches in the book, you can read large sections and chapters of books online. The best chance is google book search. Also if available download the free preview which may have what you might be looking for. If that does not help, I go ahead and buy the ebooks. Again, I assure you both of those two book references are solid, and support the statements which they cite.You can take me at my word. I spent like two hours on the article and did many searches. That one editor changed all our positive work today putting back most of the primary and unreliable sources we removed. I reverted back to your last stable version. I asked them not to add thAT stuff back in without first discussing it on the talk page in accordance with WP:BRD. Please keep an eye out there. Thanks. Antonioatrylia (talk) 23:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

    I'd forgotten about the search feature *headsmack* thanks for that & for your good work with this article. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 00:06, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    KV Madhusudhanan, former IG, CRPF

    KV Madhusudhanan, former IG, CRPF (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "KV Madhusudhanan, former IG, CRPF" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    There is no reference for this person. Seems to be an incomplete page with very little information. Adamgerber80 (talk) 12:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete There are no citations. A Google search didn't produce any decent sources. Imalawyer (talk) 17:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete: An unsourced WP:BLP on a police official whose highest rank does not appear inherently notable ("An I.G. holds the second highest rank in hierarchy, just below the Director General of Police (DGP) or Additional DGP, and just above Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG)." link). I am seeing no coverage beyond him making a speech at a passing-out parade of new recruits ([50]), which is also insufficient for encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 08:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Lake George 12ster

    Lake George 12ster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Lake George 12ster" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Mentions of this online appear to be confined to fewer than ten places presented by Google, including Facebook and meet-up sources. Unlikely that it's widely known or that it meets notability. On the article talk page, the author compares it to Adirondack Forty-Sixers, and it seems to be a recent idea based on that model. Even so, it may be WP:TOOSOON. Largoplazo (talk) 10:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Jorn van Deynhoven

    Jorn van Deynhoven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Jorn van Deynhoven" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Article does not seem to meet the notability criteria for musicians. Hakken (talk) 10:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Anita Rios

    Anita Rios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Anita Rios" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    A defeated minor party candidate for office who fails WP:NPOL and has no other credible claim to significance AusLondonder (talk) 07:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 07:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 07:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep passes WP:BASIC. Rios has received significant coverage in multiple published sources.--TM 12:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    That coverage is routine coverage to be expected of a candidate for office. Why should the criteria at WP:NPOL not apply?
    WP:ROUTINE regards events, not biographies, and as such is not applicable in this case. Per WP:BASIC, "People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable without meeting the additional criteria below", which should answer your question regarding the applicability of NPOL.--TM 14:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    ROUTINE is a question of the context in which the coverage is being given, not a question of what class of topic the article represents. An election campaign is an event — so coverage of a person in the context of an election campaign is ROUTINE, because its context is one in which such coverage is simply expected to exist for all candidates regardless of their enduring notability or lack thereof. Bearcat (talk) 17:45, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete Does not meet basic criteria. In almost no cases are candidates for office notable. Routine applies here, because there is routine coverage of election candidates, but this does not provide good ground for making articles on people. The coverage of Rios does not reach beyond her failed campaigns.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete. Candidates for office are not notable just for being candidates — to qualify for inclusion, she would need to either (a) be shown and properly sourced as having already had preexisting notability for some other reason besides the fact of being a candidate, or (b) be shown and properly sourced as having garnered far more than the merely expected level of media coverage that every candidate for any office could always show. Bearcat (talk) 17:45, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Redirect to Ohio gubernatorial election, 2014. The campaign is a notable event and there is some coverage of the fact the subject qualified for the general election as a write-in candidate. Otherwise delete per nom and Bearcat. --Enos733 (talk) 16:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    K Himaanshu Shuklaa

    K Himaanshu Shuklaa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "K Himaanshu Shuklaa" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    All the references are passing mentions without any in-depth coverage. Also, fails to meet WP:BLP1E. Page creator objected to the PROD so I am nominating for AFD for discussion to reach a consensus about the notability of this person. Malunrenta (talk) 16:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

    • I have come across many articles here on Publicists. However, i am trying to improve the article more with reliable sources. K Himaanshu Shuklaa is a famous publicist in Bollywood. (talk) 09:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete - Can only find fleeting mentions of his actions. Needs substantial coverage, from reliable, Independent sources, not based on press releases or anything issued by him, his company, friends or clients.
      The current refs are:- 1) showed his client a photo, 2) organized a photoshoot, 3) issued a tweet, 4) tweeted a link to his blog - the sort of non-noteworthy things publicists do every day. - Arjayay (talk) 17:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 07:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Kamikazes: A Deathography

    Kamikazes: A Deathography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Kamikazes: A Deathography" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    I found no coverage that shows notability. This fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 07:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 07:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Dara Fitzpatrick

    Dara Fitzpatrick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Dara Fitzpatrick" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    An individual is not notable simply because s/he died in a notable incident. There is no indication that the subject meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Prod tag removed. ... discospinster talk 02:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Delete (or redirect) - Respectfully have to agree with nom. (The primary subject, as covered in 2017 Irish Coast Guard S-92 crash and elsewhere, absolutely meets the relevant notability criteria for WP:EVENT. The guidelines however do not immediately support a standalone article or articles on the victim or victims of the (granted heartbreaking) event. Per WP:VICTIM and WP:BIO1E, people whose notability stems from their association with an event are generally covered in the article on the event.) At best the title might redirect to 2017 Irish Coast Guard S-92 crash. Guliolopez (talk) 23:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete (or redirect). Not notable in life, not varied by death. WWGB (talk) 03:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    "WELL-KNOWN PILOT Dara Fitzpatrick has been named as the first casualty of this morning’s rescue helicopter crash." "not notable" is incorrect. IrishSpook (talk) 01:29, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
    Show me one independent source about her BEFORE her death. Oh wait, there aren't any! WWGB (talk) 02:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
    Just one example of many from August 2013. IrishSpook (talk) 19:19, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete (or redirect) - Respectfully have to agree with nom. WP:NOT.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:00, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep . The individual's personal life and death has made headlines nationwide so to me it's notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.171.143.68 (talk) 10:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    51.171.143.68 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WWGB (talk) 12:39, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Weak keep. Sure, we've never heard of her before her death, but, as the IP stated, reports are emerging as to her notability. RTE states "she became the first female commercial pilot in [Ireland] and went on to be the first female captain in the country," which I have added to her article. — Wyliepedia 10:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment. Again, I feel very uncomfortable with this discussion personally, given the immediacy and sensitivity of the situation. However, either the RTÉ statement ("first commercial pilot in Ireland") is not properly qualified, or is not correct. (The "first commercial female pilot in the country" was Cpt Gráinne Cronin, who became a pilot with EI in the 1970s, and became a captain with EI in the 1980s. In both cases Cpt Fitzpatrick would still have been at school). It's possible that perhaps RTE intended "first commercial *helicopter* pilot" or "first commercial *helicopter SAR* pilot". If they did, I'm not sure perhaps that that contributes to notability directly. Guliolopez (talk) 11:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Added a {{dubious}} tag. — Wyliepedia 11:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep. First female Irish pilot to die on active service? Was on a TV programme profiling her job, crewed the first all-female helicopter mission..... all seems notable to me. The joy of all things (talk) 11:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete – No significant coverage outside of Wikipedia:ONEEVENT. Hirolovesswords (talk) 11:49, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Appearing on national and international television documentaries, professional YouTube videos, radio, TV, online and newspaper interviews all before the tragedy. IrishSpook (talk) 01:29, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Redirect. I suggest a temporary redirect. If further information about her comes to light, the article can then be reinstated without controversy. Deb (talk) 12:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep - Notable as per first in what she did and notable death sure to be remembered for years to come ...stop deleting just to delete...Masterknighted (talk) 15:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep I see literally dozens of RS Sources in Google News. Notable per sources and the sad "first" as very nicely explained above.104.163.144.60 (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep - The reason why i created an article for Dara Fitzpatrick was because of the headlines she made in my native country Ireland and her being an influence to all Irish women considering her accomplishments. Optimistic Wikipedian (talk)18:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Redirect. There is clearly only ONE correct move at this juncture and that is to REDIRECT to 2017 Irish Coast Guard S-92 crash and add salient info from the Fitzpatrick article to the latter article. You're all very welcome. Quis separabit? 02:34, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Redirect. Agree with Quis separabit's assessment. Finnegas (talk) 11:23, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Strongly Keep. Capt Dara Fitzpatrick was indeed notable long before this tragic incident, contrary to some of the above. She was a featured in a number of television documentaries which aired on major Irish and UK television networks and would have been very well known within the UK & Irish and European SAR community. She was the pilot in charge of Rescue 116, she was the Irish Coast Guard's most experienced and most senior pilot and one of the most experienced helicopter pilots of any agency or organisation in Ireland and the British Isles. Capt Fitzpatrick was, as one of the most preeminent female pilots in Irish aviation, a trailblazer and I fully support a separate, individual article about her. As regards the 3 other victims of this tragedy, who are still unfortunately missing, referenced can and will be made to them in the overarching 2017 Irish Coast Guard S-92 crash article. I strongly reject the rapid deletion tagging of the article on Dara Fitzpatrick, given the fact this incident only occurred a matter of days ago. It was unnecessary. IrishSpook (talk) 16:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
      • Furthermore, other issues such as a lack of resources dedicated to the Defence Forces resulting in the inability of the Irish Air Corps to launch top cover which was originally requested by the Irish Coast Guard which led to Rescue 116 being deployed, will be covered in the main 2017 Irish Coast Guard S-92 crash article. That article is about the incident, not a biography about the people involved in it. IrishSpook (talk) 16:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Redirect. She is quasi-notable for two things: the crash and the TV series. Neither on its own is enough for WP:NOTABILITY; I don't think even added together she meets the threshold, at least not yet. WP:NOTMEMORIAL If she becomes an important symbol in the months ahead that may change, but it will be simple to revisit the question then.
      • the fact that she was a woman has probably framed media coverage of the tragedy. But "first woman from country X to do job Y" is not a guarantee of notability. A desire to celebrate women blazing trails in male occupations cannot ignore WP:NOTADVOCATE.
      • RTE made three seasons of 6-part documentaries about Irish search-and-rescue: Rescue 117 (2010), Rescue 115 (2011), and Ireland’s Search and Rescue (2012). None of the three seems to have a Wikipedia article. Fitzpatrick was the lead pilot in Rescue 117, but I don't think most such factual/fly-on-the-wall series have articles about the "star". As it stand, not even the series themselves have a Wikipedia article.
      • jnestorius(talk)
        • This article would suggest otherwise. IrishSpook (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete or redirect - Appearing in documentaries about a wider subject does not confer notability, nor does dying in a notable crash. #WP:BLP1ERwxrwxrwx (talk) 19:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Qin Junjie

    Qin Junjie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Qin Junjie" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Deprodded with the rationale: "easily passes WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR and a 10-year career makes it hardly WP:TOOSOON". And the other editor is correct, it is not a case of WP:TOOSOON, I was attempting to give the benefit of the doubt. The actor has had a single significant role, in Noble Aspirations. That's it. Every other role is not that significant. The one other exception would have been The Legend of Qin, but he didn't appear in that film, he was voiceover talent for the animated production. Onel5969 TT me 02:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Keep: his roles in TV shows, for example Noble Aspirations, are also significant, so he passes WP:NACTOR. And Google news (for "秦俊杰") gives me 29 pages of results (so about 300 news articles, some clearly off-topic) including many detailed articles and interviews. So he passes WP:GNG. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 02:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment There are two TV series named The Legend of Qin, a 2007-2014 anime series (The Legend of Qin (TV series)) and a 2015 live-action series based on the anime. He acted in the live-action series (with Lu Yi, Michelle Chen, Jiang Jinfu, Sun Yizhou, Gong Beibi, Leo Wu, Yu Bo, Canti Lau, Zhang Meng etc., so probably a notable series except it has no page on en.wiki yet). I'd also like to point out he has an article on 4 other Wikis including Farsi and German — not a legitimate argument I know, but something to consider. Over 300,000 followers on Sina Weibo. Even his Vietnamese Fan Club on Facebook has close to 3000 members. Timmyshin (talk) 04:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    (Find sources: "秦俊杰" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference) 37900 Gnews results in Chinese
    Comment: I don't think 37,900 is correct. I am getting exactly 298 right now. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 04:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Ghits are unreliable, but the point is he's popular and likely meets WP:NACTOR: "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following." Timmyshin (talk) 05:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Libby Babet

    Libby Babet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Libby Babet" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    She is just an unnotable reality-television contestant. Grahame (talk) 01:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep. WP:ENTERTAINER Libby Babet is the trainer/host of The Biggest Loser Australia, replacing well-known fitness expert and TV personality Michelle Bridges. The Biggest Loser is one of Australia's top rating TV shows. There are 98,000 results when searching for "Libby Babet" of which, having checked the first 10 pages, I suspect most if not all are related to this Libby Babet.

    [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]

    - Tyrone28 (talk) 12:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    

    References

    1. ^ https://www.google.com.au/search?q=%22Libby+Babet%22
    2. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Biggest_Loser_(Australian_TV_series)
    3. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Biggest_Loser_Australia_(season_11)
    4. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Bridges
    5. ^ http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/fitness/weight-loss/the-biggest-loser-trainer-libby-babet-responds-to-criticism-that-at-78kg-nikki-isnt-heavy-enough-to-be-on-the-weight-loss-show/news-story/be2f6d579e5ccfc3ac0a366a7bd99053
    6. ^ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4312050/Biggest-Loser-s-Libby-Babet-train-without-tough-love.html
    7. ^ http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/television/new-the-biggest-loser-trainer-libby-babet-says-she-is-a-different-trainer-than-michelle-bridges/news-story/8ddc671f8824d40b99855c30f1db0b9a
    8. ^ http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/tv-ratings/channel-10-backs-the-biggest-loser-transformed-despite-dismal-ratings-for-launch-episode/news-story/6d760899a88d29f40641f965f371e5a6
    9. ^ https://www.byronnews.com.au/news/whats-small-screen-week/3153493/
    10. ^ http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/television/first-review-of-the-new-series-of-the-biggest-loser-on-channel-ten/news-story/b90c86d2f74edb9b047e0b731a5f16de
    11. ^ http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/lifestyle/health/the-biggest-loser-transformed-nikkis-partner-hasnt-seen-her-naked-in-three-years/news-story/cb20641ae8597ef871711eea3579a62a
    12. ^ http://www.bodyandsoul.com.au/mind-body/wellbeing/libby-babets-letter-to-the-biggest-loser-transformed-contestants/news-story/981bb91c62ae2ba0ae47f75a655858a9
    13. ^ http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/macarthur/biggest-loser-winner-sam-rouen-motivates-new-camden-contestant-simon-cummins/news-story/fd4bde2ba1425cf6edf2f27ab7e165bd
    14. ^ http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/fitness/weight-loss/the-biggest-losers-new-trainer-libby-babet-is-no-strict-paleo-pete/news-story/47b50d189f3633930a561261fcac6e74
    15. ^ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/tvshowbiz/video-1429159/Biggest-Loser-trainer-distances-methods-Michelle-Bridges.html
    16. ^ http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/penrith-press/boxer-fights-bulge-on-biggest-loser/news-story/8b1d4ddff523ea24155af849d0aeffcc
    17. ^ http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/fitness/weight-loss/sydney-personal-trainer-libby-babet-to-replace-michelle-bridges-on-new-season-of-the-biggest-loser/news-story/dbb68399dcf6c3ce04f8f90c476b551d
    18. ^ http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/the-biggest-loser-will-return-in-2017-on-ten-but-with-a-new-look-and-weightloss-focus/news-story/85abf20094f39e615b984fba61b0c7e2
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete, not a contestant, but still not notable. I have not been able to find anything on Babet that is independent and substantial, although this job is made difficult by the enormous amount of marketing fluff that has been generated about and around her, and printed in the TV pages. Would not object to a redirect to The Biggest Loser Australia (season 11) as a plausible search term. Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:44, 19 March 2017 (UTC).
    • Keep. I'm new here so apologies if I'm off track but here are some more references. Can we also cite printed references? Libby will be on the cover of Women's Fitness Magazine (115K readership) in April with a feature story about her. If this isn't what you mean by independent and substantial could you please clarify?

    [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

    References

    1. ^ Australian Institute of Fitness - Top 16 Influencers: http://fitness.edu.au/top-16-influencers-of-fitness-and-nutrition/
    2. ^ Brisbane News Feature: http://creative.news.com.au/WEB_QLD/BN_Flipbook/latest-issue/#page/8
    3. ^ Morrissey Management: http://www.morrissey.com.au/portfolio_page/libby-babet/
    4. ^ Lifestyle YOU: https://www.lifestyle.com.au/libbybabet/>
    5. ^ Wired For Wonder by Commonwealth Bank: http://www.wiredforwonder.com/archive/2015/libby-babet-1/
    6. ^ Channel 7 - Sunrise: https://au.tv.yahoo.com/sunrise/video/watch/30587463/this-years-top-fitness-fads/#page1

    Tyrone28 (talk) 04:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Precious Child

    Precious Child (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Precious Child" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Notability. Can't see anything in the way of respectable references. TheLongTone (talk) 13:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    Keep Respectable references listed include:

    Paste Magazine, 2.8M unique visitors a month http://www.trafficestimate.com/pastemagazine.com

    Bloody Disgusting, 1.7M unique visitors a month http://www.trafficestimate.com/bloody-disgusting.com Example exclusive 3/8/17 Todd Mcfarlane: http://bloody-disgusting.com/exclusives/3427169/todd-mcfarlane-just-completed-spawn-screenplay-exclusive/

    Soundtrack for Neil Gaiman (30M+ books sold) authorized biographical documentary: IMDB http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5758302/ . Pluffleses (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    This is a band article not an Albums and songs article.Pluffleses (talk) 19:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete The problem with the references cited in the "keep" ivote above by this article's SPA author are that they--like most of the other sources--are essentially submitted promotional video content that is more than half comprised of an interview (or a written statement) by the subject. Regardless of the sources numbers of unique visitors, these are first person references. What's missing regarding this subject is significant independent, third party coverage. The other sources in the article are user submitted sites, trivial mentions, or unimportant music sites/blogs. As for the soundtrack, it can be debated if an IMDB credit as "supervising sound editor" and "composer: additional music" for a documentary posted on Vimeo is encyclopedic-worthy. ShelbyMarion (talk) 08:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment The percentage of the article that is editorial vs. statement/interview is immaterial. The sources themselves are notable and accordingly, coverage by these sources itself is notable. Bloody Disgusting, Paste are reputable sites/blogs not content aggregators. This counts as independent third party significant coverage. I do not believe any of the sites cited are user submitted sites and triviality and importance can be debated. Several of the sites cited including Antihero, Brutal Resonance, and Coma Music are genre specific sites and while they may not have the unique visitor count that Paste has they are culturally relevant, impactful, and notable within specific music genres. The IMDB reference is cited to prove the work in the Neil Gaiman film. Distribution via Vimeo direct does not reduce the notability of the film and subject. A google search for the film (which someone needs to write an article for) returns coverage at Entertainment Weekly, Collider, Nerdist, Deadline [51]. Pluffleses (talk) 23:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Behroop

    Behroop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Behroop" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    No evidence of subject having achieved sufficient notability at this time. PROD removed w/o comment. —swpbT 14:49, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —swpbT 14:50, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —swpbT 14:50, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 00:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete per swpb. Article cites no sources and does not display any real notability at this time. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Search of Urdu sources?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 06:24, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete: No coverage. SL93 (talk) 19:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Worst-Case Scenario series

    Worst-Case Scenario series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Worst-Case Scenario series" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Fails WP:NBOOK and has been tagged as advertising for five years. If it can't be improved, then it is inherently promotional for the book series and should be deleted. Bri (talk) 15:14, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:08, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete Well-known book series, but this article needs a desperate WP:RESCUE. Yeah, it inspired some cable shows, but this basically gives us a product guide, a definition for what the concept was and nothing more. No improvement in ten years (and even after the 2010 series) so it might be time for those interested in this article to get it sourced or see it deleted. Nate (chatter) 22:00, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment: I don't think that the article is as bad as all that. It's not really promotional per se, just more of a bare bones list of the content that has been released so far in the series. I suppose someone could argue that this is a bit of a catalog in that regards, but there are no links to the product page and it's expected on Wikipedia that we would have a list of content released in a specific series. I would argue that the best case scenario here (pun intended) is to merge the content from the TV series into this article (which I'll do shortly) and keep this article as a whole. Sure, it needs more TLC but the article isn't so bad that it needs to be TNT'd and it does seem to meet notability guidelines as a whole, since there was a TV series based on the book series. It only ran for one season apparently, but it does look like the book series is notable. I just think that deleting this outright just isn't really the best option here. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep. The series as a whole is notable, given the two tv series and the plethora of reviews and articles that are out there. I've added a few here, but you can find still more by looking at Highbeam. The page isn't inherently promotional and I've added enough sourcing to justify the series passing notability guidelines. I've also merged the content from the two TV series since there's really not much to justify them having individual pages, given the limited information at either entry. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 00:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
      1. apRoberts, Alison (2001-11-20). "How bad can it be? - A changed world has made worst-case scenarios more than a game". The Sacramento Bee. Archived from the original on 2017-03-24. Retrieved 2017-03-24. 

        The article notes:

        "The Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook" and its spinoff books and products provide a case in point. They have capitalized on our appetite for imagined peril with a winning mix of humor and real information for readers who like action movies and what-ifs. (Bigger kids especially love them.)

        ...

        "The books that we published to entertain and amuse didn't seem quite so entertaining and amusing to us anymore," says Dave Borgenicht, who writes the worst-case books with Joshua Piven.

        Still, sales continue to move briskly for the books, and those in the worst-case-scenario business are banking on our appetite for more. A board game and greeting cards and more worst-case books are heading our way. TBS reportedly is planning a television series based on the idea.

        In the 40 scenarios covered by the first handbook, published in late 1999, the entry on "How To Land a Plane" suddenly seems more like required airport reading than a diversion. In "The Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook: Travel," several excerpts are eerily apt: "How To Survive an Airplane Crash," "How To Survive a Hostage Situation" and "How To Navigate a Minefield."

      2. Precker, Michael (2003-09-17). "'Worst-Case Scenario' series comes to the rescue of office disasters". The Dallas Morning News. Archived from the original on 2017-03-24. Retrieved 2017-03-24. 

        The article notes:

        You may be curious about how to fend off a shark, survive an avalanche or leap from a motorcycle into a moving car.

        But odds are you'll never need to apply those lessons, which made the first "Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook" a fun but unnecessary read.

        ...

        Piven and David Borgenicht, who live in Philadelphia, have turned their pessimistic perspective into a franchise. Beginning with the original Worst-Case Scenario volume four years ago, the authors have sold about 5 million books by dreaming up awful dilemmas and figuring out how to solve them.

        The formula was simple: think up the worst "what-ifs" you can - from malfunctioning parachutes to marauding alligators to quicksand - and find an expert to offer advice.

      3. Clark, Jayne (2001-04-27). "'Worst-Case' writers' newest scenario: Runaway train to fame". USA Today. Archived from the original on 2017-03-24. Retrieved 2017-03-24. 

        The article notes:

        Travel is fraught with figurative land mines, but if you ever find yourself navigating an actual minefield, better hope you've packed a copy of The Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook: Travel (Chronicle Books, $14.95). Just out, the slim, danger-red volume reads like a Joy of Cooking for raging paranoiacs. Included are step-by-step directions for grappling with highly unlikely situations, from dodging land mines (1. Keep your eyes on your feet. 2. Freeze -- Do not move any farther) to passing out bribes (Be friendly, but aloof).

        In this sequel to their best-selling The Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook, Joshua Piven and David Borgenicht have once again produced a very funny guide with a deadpan tone aimed at armchair Walter Mittys, as well as wannabe Indiana Joneses. Borgenicht briefs USA TODAY's Jayne Clark about surviving the danger that surely awaits even the most prudent traveler.

      4. Hanrahan, Jennifer (2002-02-02). "It's a jungle out there - Dating, sex latest topics of survival book series". The San Diego Union-Tribune. Archived from the original on 2017-03-24. Retrieved 2017-03-24. 

        The article notes:

        That's where "The Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook: Dating and Sex" (Chronicle Books: $14.95) comes in. The book is chock full of advice on coping with such dating dilemmas as how to carry a date who is passed out, how to deal with a bad kisser and what to do if your shirt gets caught in your zipper.

        "There are plenty of books out there that provide guidance on how to find Mr. or Ms. Right," say the authors in the introduction. "This is the only book that tells you how to escape from Mr. or Ms. Wrong. Identify an ax murderer, slip away from a bad date, survive when your credit card is declined . . . "

        The dating and sex manual is the third installment in the survival handbook series written by Philadelphia authors Joshua Piven and David Borgenicht. Their previous best sellers, "The Worst Case Scenario Survival Handbook" and "The Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook: Travel," offered tips on escaping from quicksand, fending off an alligator and surviving adrift at sea.

      5. Ross, Michele (2001-08-26). "A vacationer's guide to coping with land mines and espionage". The Plain Dealer. Archived from the original on 2017-03-24. Retrieved 2017-03-24. 

        The article notes:

        When I read the title of this new book, "The Worst-Case Scenario Handbook: Travel," I grabbed it. Who could need more help with worst-case travel scenarios than a woman traveling with a husband and children?

        Harumph. The authors took the easy way out.

        The chapter on "How to Navigate a Minefield" should contain advice for what to say when your husband asks, during a five-hour car trip, "What do you think of my mother?" Instead we get tips like "Look for spikes, detonator, wires." Big whoop.

        ...

        However, the authors do offer translations for a brilliant and eminently useful phrase, perhaps to be used by a woman who has finally announced to her family that she will be on vacation, by herself, at an undisclosed location:

        "You will never make me talk."

      6. Stoffman, Judy (2000-07-31). "Escapist reading takes on new meaning - Hot seller helps people elude bears, bees and boredom". Toronto Star. Archived from the original on 2017-03-24. Retrieved 2017-03-24. 

        The article notes:

        The sleeper publishing hit of the summer is turning out to be The Worst Case Scenario Survivor Handbook, a slim advice manual by two young men from Philadelphia, now in its fourth week on the New York Times bestseller list.

        Published late last year, the book built a following through word of mouth. A TV show and several sequels are in the works.

        ...

        Though the disasters of real life are more likely to be unpaid credit-card bills, lost keys, plugged toilets and teenage children from hell, what a lot of people seem to want to know is how to get out of quicksand, break down a door, land a plane when the pilot has had a heart attack, escape from bears, bees or mountain lions, deliver a baby in a taxi, escape from a sinking car and survive adrift at sea.

        Worst Case Scenario seems to have tapped into a deep vein of unnecessary apprehension, from Sydney, Australia to Sydney, N.S. The book is in its 11th printing, with a total of one million copies in print for the English-speaking market.

        In Canada it has sold 15,000 copies at $23 each. Raincoast Books of Vancouver, which also has the Canadian rights to the blockbuster Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire, has run out of copies and is waiting for a reshipment from publisher Chronicle Books.

      7. Joseph, Patrick (2003-03-23). "Trouble? Whip out 'Worst-Case Scenario' - Two books tell how everyone can become a super-hero". Ventura County Star. Universal Press Syndicate. Archived from the original on 2017-03-24. Retrieved 2017-03-24. 

        The article notes:

        I recalled this episode recently while flipping through "The Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook: Travel." A follow-up to the best-selling original volume the sequel is devoted to tight spots that can arise on the road.

        I read with interest short segments on such dire situations as how to escape from a car teetering on a cliff jump from a moving train and survive a high-rise hotel fire. There were even a few items that might have helped in our trip across the desert like how to control a runaway camel treat a scorpion sting and survive a sandstorm.

        The premise of the book might rightly be judged preposterous and to be sure the authors' tongues are often in cheek. The caution on the back cover for example warns that the "book may not be used as a flotation device." And then there's the entry on how to foil a UFO abduction.

        David Borgenicht co-author of the handbook with Joshua Piven said that while they intended the book to be humorous and entertaining they also took the research seriously. A list of their sources contains doctors along with a stuntman a horse trainer and an "elite French mountain commando."

      8. DeWolf, Rose (2001-04-23). "Happily Surviving". Philadelphia Daily News. Archived from the original on 2017-03-24. Retrieved 2017-03-24. 

        The article notes:

        Certainly, what has happened to these two Philadelphians - happily, neither quicksand nor a 'gator - came as a total surprise to them. Borgenicht calls it "a beautiful fluke."

        In the last 18 months, the book of advice they compiled has sold 1.5 million copies. And it's still selling. A sequel, "The Worst Case Scenario Travel Handbook," hits stores this month, along with an audiotape version of the first book, narrated by Burt Reynolds.

        There are "Worst Case Scenario" calendars, a board game is in the works, and, in January, there will be a "Worst Case Scenario" TV show on TBS cable - produced by Craig Piligian, co-executive producer of CBS' "Survivor."

        Borgenicht, 32, and Piven, 29, are busy giving interviews (in May, they're scheduled to be on the "Today" show) and, presumably, keeping track of all the money they are making.

      9. McKissack, Fred (2003-04-27). "Now What? - 'Worst-Case Scenario' Authors Have Advice For Most Any Situation From Flying Leaps to Eternal Meetings.". Wisconsin State Journal. Archived from the original on 2017-03-24. Retrieved 2017-03-24. 

        The article notes:

        Well, welcome to the world of Joshua Piven.

        At 32, Piven and partner David Borgenicht are the co-authors of the ultra-successful "Worst-Case Scenario" series of cheeky, but well-detailed guides from Chronicle Books that began with the 1999 publishing of "The Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook," which made both the New York Times' and Publishers Weekly's best-sellers lists.

        Since then they've moved from the ludicrously unlikely to shedding the light on those wholly realistic moments such as wishing you knew how to bail from some dreadful meeting with "Worst-Case Scenario: Work."

        Piven and Borgenicht's latest is set for release next month and has already received good press. This new edition does keep with providing entertaining and useful survival techniques as its predecessors, which include the original, plus books on enduring the worst possible hypothetical scenarios in travel, dating and sex, golf and holidays.

      10. Hageman, William (2013-07-14). "Adventures in Dating". Daily Press. Archived from the original on 2017-03-24. Retrieved 2017-03-24. 

        The article notes:

        Luckily, we have David Borgenicht.

        He has written "The Complete Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook: Dating & Sex" (Chronicle Books). With co-authors Joshua Piven and Ben H. Winters, Borgenicht presents some 400 pages of potential disasters -- that bout of excessive gas on a date, for example -- and suggests ways to overcome the problem. Or at least minimize the damage.

        ...

        The book is the latest in the "Worst-Case Scenario" series, now numbering more than a dozen. Other topics include travel, parenting, weddings, college, paranormal, golf and survival.

      11. Davis, Phil (2000-04-23). "Yikes! Now What? When That Shark Bites With Its Teeth, Dear, Here's How to Survive". Los Angeles Daily News. Archived from the original on 2017-03-24. Retrieved 2017-03-24. 

        The article notes:

        "The Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook" (Chronicle Books; $14.95), is a funny and, yes, possibly even a helpful book. All the advice in it was compiled in detailed interviews with experts in specific dire straits, from emergency childbirth to jumping from a five-story building into a dumpster. Maybe it will help you walk on top of a train, jump from a moving motorcycle to a car or win a swordfight. Maybe not. "The Worst-Case Scenario Survival Handbook" comes with no guarantees, only a warning ("DO NOT ATTEMPT TO UNDERTAKE ANY OF THE ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED IN THE BOOK") and a disclaimer ("THE PUBLISHER, AUTHORS AND EXPERTS DISCLAIM ANY LIABILITY").

        ...

        Both Borgenicht, 31, and Piven, 28, are mild-mannered writers from Philadelphia whose most risky excursions are driving or sharpening a pencil.

        The book was conceived in a mix of paranoia, fear and popular culture.

        ...

        They tracked down experts from Mountain Mel, a former U.S. Navy SEAL who told them how to make a fire without matches, to Chris Caso, a former UCLA gymnast-turned-stuntman whose high-fall credits include "Batman Forever'"and "The Lost World."

      There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Worst-Case Scenario series to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

      Cunard (talk) 04:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Mike Bivins

    Mike Bivins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Mike Bivins" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    PROD-ed because I do not see the article's subject meeting WP:JOURNALIST. Page author contested PROD by stating Bivins met WP:GNG for significant coverage in reliable sources but to me the coverage in most sources seems trivial (merely mentioning he was there and filming video for Periscope streaming). RA0808 talkcontribs 17:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. RA0808 talkcontribs 17:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. RA0808 talkcontribs 17:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. RA0808 talkcontribs 17:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Keep, as Bivins' has been covered in the Washington Post, which is one of the nation's biggest newspapers but perhaps Bivins' entry should be reorganized to mention that he is notable for his protest coverage, and has been sought out for his opinions on protests, as seen in this video where he is interviewed by the news about his footage that showed a blogger pulling a gun on black lives matter protesters.
    Did you read the The Inlander (newspaper) article about Bivins? Inlander does 50,000+ copies, and they went into detail about his work, inspirations, and other things. To me, trivial is a box score, or a one word mention of a person. This is not the case with him. Here is another article about Bivins. I'm going to update the article. Mercury does 45,000 copies by the way. Another news channel had Bivins call into their live show to be interviewed about another experience reporting on protests at Portland's city hall. Pittsburghangelsforever (talk) 21:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Wikipedia requires significant coverage. I'm not at all sure two articles in local newspapers meet that requirement. Kleuske (talk) 22:09, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Washington Post is not a local paper. Neither is the Inlander. Those are a long way from Oregon. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/11/10/not-my-president-thousand-protest-trump-in-rallies-across-the-u-s/?utm_term=.a93530dd8619
    http://www.inlander.com/spokane/the-live-wire/Content?oid=2950780utm_term=.41313b98313fPittsburghangelsforever (talk) 22:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    He was mentioned in passing by the Wash. Post. That's not significant coverage. Kleuske (talk) 22:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    He was mentioned 3 times and was quoted. Not exactly in passing. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/11/10/not-my-president-thousand-protest-trump-in-rallies-across-the-u-s/?utm_term=.a93530dd8619 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pittsburghangelsforever (talkcontribs) 23:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    That was an accident and was swiftly corrected. I appreciate your input. Pittsburghangelsforever (talk) 23:17, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    "Accident" is probably not the correct term, but thank you for your prompt response. John from Idegon (talk) 01:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment: The article says: [his] reporting about civil unrest in the United States has itself been the object of news coverage.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Somebody wanting the article to remain might summarize the content of this coverage. (Currently, only three among these references are reused later in the article.) -- Hoary (talk) 00:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    • And another comment. I'm concerned about the PRODding of this article. (And no, I don't mean the part saying "This article may have been previously nominated for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Bivins exists", which of course wouldn't have appeared back then.) The "concern" cited was "No indication of meeting WP:JOURNALIST." This sounds like good grounds for this AfD. But the template was attached to a short article that was soberly written and came with nine references to solid-sounding sources. Whatever your estimate of the notability of the biographee (and I haven't yet made up my own mind), even back in its PRODded state this looked like a conscientious attempt to create a decent article on somebody about whom usable sources existed. Hardly PROD material. -- Hoary (talk) 02:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment: Like Hoary, I have not made a determination, yet, about the notability of this subject. I, too, liked the writing style, a sober encyclopedic tone, well-cited from a few reasonable sources. The case for a journalist’s bio is pretty thin, though, maybe too soon, with the Washington Post article giving him 4 sentences, and the Inlander describing his work filming and live streaming from different demonstrations. Strictly speaking, this coverage is not so much about the person as it is about his work with the relatively new phenomenon in journalism of live streaming, and its use by traditional news outlets. With connections to social media and infotainment, possibly the subject might qualify as having “made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment” under WP:ENT? I am not aware of criteria specifically for internet celebrities, but maybe that is what is needed. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 05:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment: What Hoary said about Bivins possibly being notable for something other than being a journalist gets at what I was talking about when I say Bivins should be considered notable under the WP:GNG. How many times does someone have to be appear on TV or in print to be considered generally notable? Pittsburghangelsforever (talk) 01:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
    • I don't quite understand what you're referring to, Pittsburghangelsforever. As for your insistence that yes this man is notable, or your questions about what notability means, I suspect that this will do nothing to help the chances of this article's survival. If you do want it to survive, I suggest that you reread my comment above timestamped 00:33, 9 March 2017, and act on it. For even now, only three among a stack of eight references are reused. Is the "news coverage" merely trivial? (I don't know, because I haven't looked.) If it is, then cut the links as redundant. If no, it's not trivial, then use the links productively. -- Hoary (talk) 02:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Hoary I had you confused with the other person. Thanks, I'll act on it. Pittsburghangelsforever (talk) 02:48, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 00:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Siti Aisyah

    Siti Aisyah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Siti Aisyah" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Article is about a person accused of taking part in a serious crime, but not so far found guilty. The crime is notable, but Siti Aisyah as an individual is not, as sources discuss her only in relation to the crime. The article needs to be either deleted or turned into a redirect to Kim Jong-nam, as previously happened to the Đoàn Thị Hương article. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 21:12, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

    At the very least redirect. Why would we delete it outright when it's a plausible search term? @FreeKnowledgeCreator:, what is wrong with the plan: throw any relevant categories into the redirect, move sources to the main article, and keep this? ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Sorry, @Koavf:, I don't see exactly what you are suggesting. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 22:43, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Right now, Siti Aisyah is an article. I think that it is a reasonable search term (for instance, I searched for it here!). If we delete it, then there will just be a redlink--how is that helpful to anyone? It will also just encourage someone to remake it. Instead, replace the article's contents with Kim_Jong-nam#Death, move all of the information from the current article there, and keep the categories that are on the page (such as Category:1992 births) for navigation purposes. Don't you agree that this is a better option than deletion? ―Justin (koavf)TCM 22:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    As I said at the outset, I see nothing wrong with a redirect. Nor would there be any problem relocating relevant material from this article to Kim Jong-nam. I don't care about the categories. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 04:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep or Merge. No compliance with WP:Before. Tons of articles around the world on her involvement. And even though this is a single incident, it has international interest and implications. Deleting this is like deleting Lee Harvey Oswald, who was a loner involved in a single incident. 7&6=thirteen () 13:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    I can understand a merge, but not keep. There is undoubtedly plenty of coverage on Siti Aisyah's alleged involvement in the murder of Kim Jong-nam (we have to be careful here as she has not yet been convicted) but the coverage only deals with her alleged participation in the crime, it is not really coverage of her as an individual. She is hardly the equivalent of Lee Harvey Oswald. She is more like her alleged accomplice Đoàn Thị Hương, whose article was turned into a redirect with no objections. Can you suggest any reason why Siti Aisyah would be more deserving of an article than Đoàn Thị Hương? FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 20:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Merge She is a key figure in an important event so I would oppose deleting the article completely, but at the same time I don't think she in notable independently of the murder of Kim Jong Nam. To me the obvious thing to do would be to merge this article with Kim Jong-Nam and have it redirect to the section about his death. Imalawyer (talk) 06:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep - OK sources, the article subject seems notable enough per WP:GNG. and WP:CRIME.BabbaQ (talk) 16:06, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
      • What is your evidence that the sources are about Siti Aisyah as an individual, as opposed to being about a crime in which she allegedly took part? And why would Siti Aisyah be more deserving of an article than Đoàn Thị Hương? Per WP:EVENT: "People known only in connection with one event should generally not have an article written about them." If you want to make a convincing case for keeping the article, BabbaQ, then please show just what else Siti Aisyah is known for. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 21:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 00:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Coy Bowles

    Coy Bowles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Coy Bowles" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Should be a redirect to the band. But redirect keeps getting reverted. Not enough in-depth sourcing about the individual musician to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. Onel5969 TT me 21:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    References

    • Gwinnett Daily Post
    • The Plain Dealer
    • People magazine
    • Indianapolis Star
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Do the sources found by Northamerica1000 convey notability?
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 00:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 06:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Crisis in the Kremlin (film)

    Crisis in the Kremlin (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Crisis in the Kremlin (film)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Not a notable movie by any stretch of the imagination, even though Theodore Bikel got second billing. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Delete Hollywood Reporter is perhaps the only report that mentions the movie in passing. Fails NFILM and other general notability parameters. Lourdes 06:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete: Non-notable film according to my search. Roger Corman rules, but this film fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 09:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 09:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

    The result was deleteIanblair23 (talk) 10:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Little Jimmy's Memes

    Little Jimmy's Memes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Little Jimmy's Memes" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    This article is a mistake, and was meant as a test. Eprash (talk) 05:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC) Adding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Jimmy's Memes

    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

    Televisión de la Frontera

    Televisión de la Frontera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Televisión de la Frontera" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Ownership of one television and a newspaper does not mean the company merits an article on its own. Raymie (tc) 05:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Best F(r)iends

    Best F(r)iends (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Best F(r)iends" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    IMDB is not a reliable source Kandry321 (talk) 03:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Perhaps not, but is it notable? I mean it follows one of the worst movie of all time, this sounds quite promising.--Milowenthasspoken 04:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 04:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • An earlier version of this article had a couple of independent sources, which were removed. And there are more articles about this production that can be seen in a GNews search for Tommy Wiseau. On the other hand, nearly all of these news articles appeared around October 12, 2016; since then, the sources I found are basically bare mentions of this film in articles that focus on The Room or The Disaster Artist. So in view of the dictates of WP:NFF I am not sure if this, um, long-awaited film is ripe yet for its own article. --Arxiloxos (talk) 06:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Theepachelvan Pratheepan

    Theepachelvan Pratheepan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Theepachelvan Pratheepan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    The article failed to prove the WP:BIO. References are given for sake of procedure, but fail to WP:VER ~AntanO4task (talk) 03:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 06:56, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 06:57, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC(talk) 03:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Anthony E. Meyer

    Anthony E. Meyer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Anthony E. Meyer" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Another rich venture capitalist; article betrays a bunch of "I work for Mr. Meyer" edits that fluff up the article. Not notable via the GNG, as far as I can tell; there's a CUNY webpage about a donation, but I don't see significant discussion of this person in reliable sources. Drmies (talk) 03:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Ah--I see this has been at AfD before, with a predictable result. Drmies (talk) 03:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete: We're not Linkedin for rich people who are not president of the U.S.--Milowenthasspoken 04:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete: Anthony E. Meyer is the son of a wealthy person and not notable himself himself per my research. The page's main sources are commercial websites created and controlled by the subject. "I work for Mr. Meyer edits" indicate subject likely uses Wikipedia to build his image for commercial purposes. Zhang213 (talk) 13:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Johnny Keyser

    Johnny Keyser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Johnny Keyser" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Reason Smartwater123 (talk) 22:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

    The artist no longer goes under the name Johnny Keyser. He now goes under John.K. His wikipedia has been created for John.K and there is no need to have Johnny Keyser.

    • Surely in that case the best thing to do is to update the article with any sourced info from the new article John.k that is not already in Johnny Keyser, and then delete the new article and move the current article to that title. Or is it better to merge the info from the old article into the new one and redirect, to save edit histories of both articles? The problem is that the new article has been edited pretty extensively by different people, so simply deleting it as a copy and moving the old one to that title would remove that edit history. --bonadea contributions talk 07:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete both Johnny Keyser and John.k: Two similar promotional articles created for an unsuccessful talent show competitor. An EP which reached no.46 on the Top Heatseekers album chart does not appear to be enough for WP:CHART and I am not seeing evidence of attained notability, whether by WP:MUSICBIO or WP:BASIC. AllyD (talk) 08:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:08, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

    Delete both. Fails WP:GNG and does not meet WP:NMUSIC. Onel5969 TT me 02:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: John.k page watchers weren't properly notified. Adding template there and relisting for a week.
    John.k (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 03:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Martin Iveson

    Martin Iveson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Martin Iveson" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Non-notable person. Claim of notability lacks reliable sources. - TheMagnificentist 15:42, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:09, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:09, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
    keep music artists for multiple notable video games + jazz career. article could use more sources added, so. Shaddim (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete Seems to have a credible and respected career in the industry but lacks the significant, independent, third party sources necessary to qualify for encyclopedic importance. If an editor provided better significant sources I could be persuaded to change my vote; my searches under both “Martin Iveson” and “atjazz” only turned up the usual kinds of things one would expect to confirm existence. ShelbyMarion (talk) 13:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 00:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC(talk) 02:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Jack Kaminer

    Jack Kaminer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Jack Kaminer" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Fails NHOOP since the subject was not a figure in the listed leagues. Also fails GNG since the only source that offers a biography on the subject, is from his own program. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 06:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 06:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep – I added some third party, reliable sources and beefed up the content. Kaminer was the coach of one of the most notable programs in the first half of the 20th century. It definitely needed cleanup but I hope my edits remedied concerns. Jrcla2 (talk) 14:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    I appreciate the effort Jrcla2 but I'm not fully convinced yet. The sources from 1971 are about when David Polansky resigned and the immediate fallout. His hall of fame induction seems somewhat weak since it is not a notable hall. I wish there were some sources on his career at the college then this would have been easier. Still, I could be wrong, and I'm more happy you actually added the content instead of just listing possible sources. So thank you for that.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 01:46, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    The Peak Apartments

    The Peak Apartments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "The Peak Apartments" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    A WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable residential development. Significant RS coverage not found. I've found one press release and one catalog listing. The content is routine: how many units, etc. Notability not inherited from the Paddy's Market atop of which the building sits.

    Tagged for notability since 2008. Created by Special:Contributions/Mynameisbobobobob with no other contributions outside of the Australian real estate market. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete, for the reasons outlined by the nominator. Even the title of the cited 1997 offline article doesn't suggest it is solely about The Peak. Sysney has a large number of tall buildings so this residential block isn't remarkable in any respect. Sionk (talk) 22:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment If consensus ends up being to delete here, I would strongly suggest a redirect to List of tallest buildings in Sydney -- Whats new?(talk) 23:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC(talk) 02:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep: The list-article List of tallest buildings in Sydney contains substantial assertion (omitted from the AFD subject article) that the subject was "Tallest residential building in Sydney from 1996–1997" and it is still tied for 21st. I don't doubt the accuracy of that; it should be in the article. I expect that newspapers covered the construction in sources that are not conveniently online to find right now, though I haven't looked. I waver but suggest Keep rather than merge/redirect; nothing is gained by removing this from view IMHO. Certainly the outcome should not be an outright delete; merge/redirect to the row in the list-article is far better. --doncram 03:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Hmm. I really want to support Doncram, but I can't find anything reliable that discusses the topic, and I just don't think that the claim Doncram identified is a reason to keep the article. However, I also don't agree with the nominator's claim that this is a promotional article. Sorry, closing admin, I can't help you one way or the other. Drmies (talk) 03:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment: I really want to support Doncram as well; theoretically it may be notable. Unfortunately I suspect few avid historians of the history of The Peak Apartments exist, as there are currently no endowed chairs for this endeavor. I've rescued worse before but the muse has not moved me on this one.--Milowenthasspoken 04:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment: From searching on "Peak Apartments Sydney 1996 construction", yields, behind paywall for me: The Sydney Morning Herald from Sydney, New South Wales · Page 87 / [https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/123768159/ Aug 31, 1996 - ... Herald (Sydney, New South Wales), Saturday, August 31, 1996, Page 87. ... ON THEIR BOOKS Under construction in the CBD Leighton Sydney .... apartment development and the $125 million Peak Apartments, and is also ..." Interesting that it was a $125 million project, and there would be more info in that article and others of that era. This is evidence of coverage existing; we don't need it in hand to do the right thing. --doncram 04:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Research Department of Neuroscience

    Research Department of Neuroscience (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Research Department of Neuroscience" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Non-notable education department outside of Ruhr University Bochum. WP:NOTINHERITED. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • delete - academic spam. Jytdog (talk) 03:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Audrey Gallagher

    Audrey Gallagher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Audrey Gallagher" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Non-notable singer. Tag for not references has not elicited any improvement in almost eight years. Hakken (talk) 17:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:11, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:11, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:11, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment if her youtube views are not sufficient to impress us, and I suspect they are not, and if her "List of Songs" is not sufficient to impress us (aside from the fact that every song is a completely vanilla title, and wouldn't be nice if she had one totally weird song name like "Wikipedia Wants To Kill Me and Spirit Cook My Entrails For Hillary Clinton") perhaps it can be re-directed to her prior band article, Scheer (band).--Milowenthasspoken 04:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Fractured (band)

    Fractured (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Fractured (band)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Does not seem to meet any of the requirements at Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Criteria for musicians and ensembles. No sources or citations. Not even much of an assertion of notability. Vectro (talk) 01:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    WWE Raw Talk

    WWE Raw Talk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "WWE Raw Talk" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    WWE Network post-show for Raw-branded pay-per-view events. Not notable in its own right. Dannys-777 (talk) 01:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Dannys-777 (talk) 01:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Delete Fails WP:GNG. Also, this appears to be copy-pasted from Pro Wrestling Wikia, like most of creator's articles. Nickag989talk 10:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Thirupalliyezhuchi

    Thirupalliyezhuchi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Thirupalliyezhuchi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    This article has no citations, and it fails to establish the notability of its subject. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    John A. Bryant

    John A. Bryant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "John A. Bryant" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Questionable notability since November 2011. Fails WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE and WP:GNG. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Simon Pollack

    Simon Pollack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Simon Pollack" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    This article fails to demonstrate the subject's notability by showing that he has "received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." Eddie Blick (talk) 01:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep The article title is misspelled. It should be Simon Pollak. There is plenty of secondary coverage and I'm going to add some of that. He was one of the earliest U.S. ophthalmologists (first one in St. Louis, first eye/ear clinic west of Mississippi), in addition to his work founding the school for the blind. I'll move to the appropriate spelling. EricEnfermero (Talk) 02:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep with the correct spelling Simon Pollak. An online search with this spelling reveals plenty of reliable resources to work with and establish WP:BIO notability. -- IsaacSt (talk) 03:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Nils Hämmerli

    Nils Hämmerli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Nils Hämmerli" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Fails WP:GNG, just a man with a job The Banner talk 14:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    Keep As Leader of the Patrouille Suisse, its work on the Air14, Chief of the F-5 fleet of the swiss air Force, Chief Air Defense clearly notable. also covered in enough Books:
    • Peter Bosshard, Donat Achermann: Menschen Maschinen Missionen: Geschichten vom Militärflugplatz Dübendorf 1914-2014., Egg bei Zürich 2014, ISBN 978-3-033-04653-5, S. 126
    • Swissness 50 years Patrouille Suisse & 25 years PC-7 TEAM ISBN 978-3-906562-43-8
    • Patrouille Suisse - Backstage , Katsuhiko Tokunaga, Urs Mattle ISBN 978-3-909111-76-3
    • Aridio Pellanda: Ueberwachungsgeschwader 30 Jahre Patrouille Suisse Max Huber, Kerzers ISBN 3906401219
    • Schweizer Luftwaffe Jahrespublikation 2015, S. 71
    • Schweizer Luftwaffe Jahrespublikation 2011, S. 9–11

    FFA P-16 (talk) 15:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Delete just another pilot doing a good job but not noteworthy enough for a stand-alone article, very few leaders of aerobatic teams are notable, most references are publicity material for the team (where all team members get a mention not just the leader). MilborneOne (talk) 15:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Menschen Maschinen Missionen: Geschichten vom Militärflugplatz Dübendorf 1914-2014.,Schweizer Luftwaffe Jahrespublikation 2015, S. 71,Schweizer Luftwaffe Jahrespublikation 2011, S. 9–11 are NOT writing about him as Patrouille Suisse Leader.FFA P-16 (talk) 15:41, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    "Due to his job" is definitiv not enough to get commander of the PC-7 Team or the Patrouille Suisse. Also the job as Chief Air Defense is not a 08/15 pilot's job.FFA P-16 (talk) 19:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
      • "Due to his job" is that he he has to give interviews not because he is interesting but because his job is interesting. The Banner talk 22:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    @The Banner:Wrong, Jahrespublikation 2011 and Menschen Maschinen Missionen are writen before he was Commander of the Patrouille Suisse. Also "Due to his job" is not an argument for deletion, because then every articel about an CEO on wikipedia can be deleted because a CEO is also just doing his job.FFA P-16 (talk) 22:34, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    No, my friend, you are wrong. It is definitely an argument to be used. Even with a CEO there should be sources available about the man/woman behind the CEO specifically. When there are only sources about the "the man/woman CEO", than that personon is not notable. Sorry. The Banner talk 23:13, 9 March 2017 (UTC) And please,k could you stop accusing me of wikihounding, as you did on your talkpage? It is unpolite and it is getting a bit silly and pitiful.
    And we have sources available about the man/woman behind the CEO.. Again in: "Menschen Maschinen Missionen"is written why he stayed at Dübendorf and not moved to Meiringen, its writen that made an apprenticeship as an architectural draftsman and wanted to develop himself in the field of architecture, as a friend once again awakened his interest in the flying who he had had in his childhood. Also its writen that he is a member of the Air Force rockband "Supersonic", comes from Zumikon, is married and has a son and a daughter. So its on paper about his job and about him as person.FFA P-16 (talk) 09:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
    An article clearly written because of his job, not because the man is so interesting. The Banner talk 09:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    And you are already contradicting yourself, because nobody asks for the existing articles about CEOs (or for Football trainer, etc) what you are trying to fault here.FFA P-16 (talk) 10:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    We are discussing the article about Nils Hämmerli. And that article must show his notability on its own, not by a "but-they-do-it-too"-logic. That there are other bad articles is not an excuse to create other bad articles. The Banner talk 10:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    Then you should better care about the othe bad ones, because we have here a media coverage who is well enough and again in "Menschen Maschinen Missionen" ist about him as Mensch (Human) and not about his job.FFA P-16 (talk) 19:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    That article would never have been there without the job. The Banner talk 20:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Rainbow Tribe

    Rainbow Tribe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Rainbow Tribe" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    An unneeded disambiguation page, from what I can see. The only thing on the page that actually matches the title 'Rainbow Tribe' is a non-notable nickname that Josephine Baker apparently gave her adopted kids. The rest are at best a few partial title matches. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    • I'm a veteran at Afd but I think this is the first disambiguation page I've ever nominated for deletion, so I'll keep a close watch on this one, to ensure that I've understood policy correctly. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Hi Shawn (@Shawn in Montreal:), I originally created this page because in 2006 I had gone through WP in search of the "Rainbow Tribe," (a cultural phenomenon largely from the 60s and 70s), and instead only found an article titled Rainbow Family. Myself as a child of the 60s, I had often then heard the term "Rainbow Tribe," so I created a redirect for the term, then pointing to the Rainbow Family. Now it appears that there are probably two major articles on essentially the same subject, one at Rainbow Family, and one at Rainbow Gathering, which at first glance, it appears that they might be better off merged.
    This disambiguation page has since apparently changed significantly from my original redirect, and now appears to have been entirely created by others in a somewhat haphazard fashion, apparently attempting to clarify the relationship between the much larger Rainbow Gathering movement, and the many who came after it and apparently attempted to co-opt the name for less notable uses. Suggestion: First, check to see the page traffic. I would be willing to bet you that it is quite heavy, because there are lots of folks apparently in this still quite active movement. In order to help the largest number of folks, don't delete this page, but improve it. The relationship between the two major articles should be resolved, and this page should be preserved to resolve all of the obvious confusion that seems to still surround this group. If you would like to work together with me on this "cleanup process," I would be happy to do so. If instead, you might still prefer to do anything else with this page, I will say no further on it. Thanks, Scott P. (talk) 19:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Hi Shawn and Scott, I agree with Scott that, depending on the age or background of the person writing/searching, they may use "Rainbow Tribe" more than "Rainbow Family" when referring to the group described in the article by the latter name. I'm not particularly attached to working on the disambig, but I think a disambig is better-suited than just a simple redirect to the "Family" article. There are also some LGBT groups, and new age groups unrelated to the Rainbow Family group but inspired by the fakelore, who are, at least informally, using "Rainbow Tribe" in names or nicknames for their groups, so, there may be more entries to add here before too long.
    I also concur that Rainbow Family and Rainbow Gathering are practically duplicates and may be best merged. When I saw the AfD notice, I actually assumed that's what this was going to be about. Best, - CorbieV 20:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:33, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep User:CorbieVreccan suggests that "Rainbow Tribe" is an alternative name for Rainbow Family, but that is not suggested in the disambiguation page currently and it is not stated in the article. It would be better if someone would edit the article to say "also known as "Rainbow Tribe"" perhaps even with a source having that usage. And the disambiguation page entry should be revised to show:
    • Rainbow Family, a group committed to principles of non-violence and non-hierarchical egalitarianism, also known as Rainbow Tribe
    Then we'd all be happy, and future readers/editors would not wonder why the Family item is on the disambiguation page. I'll vote "Keep" because that's what I think is fair based on what was said here, although I am not myself familiar with these terms. --doncram 03:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Keep, as I think

    Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool

    Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Having seen another of the author's articles which featured heavy use of ® and was associated with Mansbach I'm now incapable of seeing this article as anything other than an advert and, in places, a close paraphrase of the company's website. I'd appreciate the community's opinion. Cabayi (talk) 08:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 08:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 08:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 08:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep: The Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool is a cognitive instrument, not a company. Countless neuropsychological assessments emanating from neuropsychology have dedicated wikipedia pages, such as Mini–Mental State Examination, Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System, Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery and the Wechsler Memory Scale etc., – all of which are cost-based and were developed by commercial entities. The Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool is used extensively in the public sector, such as in grants funded by the Maryland Office of Health Care Quality and by state governments such as Ohio's Medical program for cognitive assessment. It is also currently being used by various universities in the United States, Turkey, Poland, and China. In the healthcare spectrum, it is used in primary care settings, as well as in gerontology, neurology, oncology, and rehabilitation. The Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool, which has been withstood peer-review in several scientific journals, has encyclopedic merit as a wikipedia page. Rymace (talk) 02:41, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
    Rymace, this discussion isn't about whether the product is notable, it probably is, but about the article. In contrast to the articles you've cited the article you've written comes across as an advert. I note that most, if not all, of your contributions have been for products of Mansbach Health Tools (this article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The BCAT Working Memory Exercise Book - [52], ENRICH Brain Health - [53]). It appears your conflict of interest has left you tone-deaf to the way your article reads, and to the close paraphrasing of the company's material. You also seem to have a blind spot in describing it as "a cognitive instrument" overlooking its existence as a commercial product. If it weren't for the time elapsed since the article was created, and the number of editors who have touched it at some point, I'd have no hesitation in nominating the article for speedy deletion as an advert. Cabayi (talk) 11:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • delete raw scientific market. pure example of the thing. Nothing like this has a place in WP. Jytdog (talk) 03:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Glenn Llopis

    Glenn Llopis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Glenn Llopis" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    A person purporting to be connected with the subject of this article, JimmyDonuts, made a GF attempt to edit and update it to bring it into compliance with BLP. He disclosed his COI at the Teahouse and, there, also indicated that if we couldn't get it up to a level of BLP acceptability, he - and the subject - would be keen to see it deleted. While the subject has been copiously quoted in WP:RS, coverage of the subject is - literally - just quotes. None of the biographical information contained in the BLP can be sourced to RS. If we remove unsourced or improperly sourced material we will be left with a BLP that simply acknowledges the individual is a living human who has been quoted in a number of media outlets and works as a motivational speaker. I feel like this is a person who probably will, in the near future, merit an article but at the present time the coverage doesn't meet the standard of substantial to pass GNG and we have a total lack of RS that would allow inclusion of even the basic information customary to a biography. I would suggest this be deleted with no prejudice for its future recreation. DarjeelingTea (talk) 03:47, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note - For ease of processing this AfD I've gone ahead and removed the aforementiond unsourced (and one instance of improperly sourced) content from the article. DarjeelingTea (talk) 03:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    J. Thomas McAfee

    J. Thomas McAfee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "J. Thomas McAfee" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    No independent references (nor could I find any) to justify notability. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:21, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 04:32, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 01:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Sachi Hamano filmography

    Sachi Hamano filmography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Sachi Hamano filmography" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    A collection of non-notable titles. The article has been deprodded with the rationale that this was a filmography for a noted female director of pink films. However, I do not believe this is a valid reason to keep this article. For example, I randomly searched for Roman Polanski filmography and was directed to a section in the main Polanski article. All the movies listed are blue-linked.

    I thus believe WP:NOTCATALOG applies, and the article should be deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:48, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:48, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment: It was me who deprodded it -- not because I thought it should be retained, but because I wasn't convinced by the reason given for deletion and I thought there could be reasonable objection to deletion. This had/has ambitions of being rather more than some random list. WP:NOTCATALOG doesn't obviously apply: if Hamano is indeed notable (and there's not yet any proposal to delete the article about her), then I suppose her oeuvre has some notability. And if it does, then listing it doesn't seem unreasonable or inappropriate. I'd rush to agree that Polanski's output is greatly more notable (in either a normal sense or in Wikipedia's slightly odd sense), but the fact that a notable subject is dealt with in one section of an article is not a valid reason why a less notable subject should not be given its own article, especially when, as here, it requires some bulk. -- Hoary (talk) 09:23, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 01:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Peter H. Grossman

    Peter H. Grossman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Peter H. Grossman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    This isn't a biography, it's a plastic surgeon's advert, bombarded with very thin sources. Calton | Talk 12:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • delete should have been speedy-promoed. Not a WP article; not even close. Jytdog| (talk) 03:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete as an advertisement. I particularly liked "with a degree in history before attending the prestigious Chicago Medical School." The Wikipedia article about the school says "The Chicago Medical School has had accreditation issues in 2004[2] and again in 2013,[3] when it was placed on probation by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) for non-academic reasons. In February 2014, the LCME determined that the school's areas of concerns were in compliance.[4]" Edison (talk) 04:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Isometre

    Isometre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Isometre" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Dicdef, no sources since 2009. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 14:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    BaCon

    BaCon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "BaCon" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Non-noteable software. TheDragonFire (talk) 04:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    If you search such as "bacon" "basic to c", etc. you can see there are some mentions even in IBM's website. --88.251.59.123 (talk) 20:12, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 18:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:24, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • DeLete: Does not appear to be notable.--Milowenthasspoken 04:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Ian Bernardo

    Ian Bernardo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Ian Bernardo" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Z list celebrity. Some minor appearances but not enough to satisfy WP:NACTOR not WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 23:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:25, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Kevin De Clue

    Kevin De Clue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
    (Find sources: "Kevin De Clue" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

    Non-notable musician. Chase (talk | contributions) 00:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    • De Lete: For a a Multi-Platinum Producer I am surprised I can find no reliable sources sufficient to write a BLP.--Milowenthasspoken 04:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Files

    Files for discussion

    March 24

    File:Pacific West Conference logo.png

    File:Pacific West Conference logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    TOO concern, given the mountains. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Page from Science report MHSG 1882.jpg

    File:Page from Science report MHSG 1882.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikiniini76 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    If this is a scan from an OLD report it can't be self work? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Paknam welcome sign.JPG

    File:Paknam welcome sign.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nakhungai (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    Sign design is owned by a third party. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Dinker Belle University Pic.jpg

    File:Dinker Belle University Pic.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Abhinav Seth 17 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    Refferal as this seems to be a scan of third party content. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Semi-Circular Quay Model.gif

    File:Semi-Circular Quay Model.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tony Rodi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    possible derivative of non-free content (models) FASTILY 01:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Barry Stokes (actor).jpg

    File:Barry Stokes (actor).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beryl reid fan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    Non-free image being used to identify a living person. Despite the arguments made for non-free use on File talk:Barry Stokes (actor).jpg, non-free use in such cases (as discussed in Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 67#Replaceable fair use for retired/no longer publically active living individuals) for individuals who may be retired or who are no longer in the public eye is usually only acceptable when said individual's appearance is one of the reasons they are Wikipedia notable. There's no sourced discussion of Stokes in Barry Stokes (actor) which requires the reader actually see a photo of him to be understood. Moreover, the claim in the non-free use rationale that non-free use is justified because it illustrates Stokes as a handsome leading man is WP:OR sounding since it's not something supported by any cited content within the article. I think it's a given that many leading men are "handsome" to a certain degree and this in and of itself does not really seem to be a reason to justify non-free use. If the point of this photo is to show that Stokes is handsome, then there's no real need to use this particular screenshot and perhaps one of the photos found at http://www.aveleyman.com/ActorCredit.aspx?ActorID=16582 could be used instead. If there are other photos which might be used for basically the same purpose, the non-free use of any of them then is primarily decorative and not really justified per WP:NFCC#8. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Hi Marchjuly - Are images at http://www.aveleyman.com/ActorCredit.aspx?ActorID=16582 free? Beryl reid fan (talk) 11:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    I don't think they are since they look like they were taken from somewhere else and not something created by the owner of that website. The best place to ask about that would be at WP:MCQ. It's possible their use would be considered fair use under US copyright law, but Wikipedia's non-free content policy has been made intentionally more restrictive than the US concept of fair use for the reasons explained in WP:NFC#Background. -- Marchjuly (talk) 15:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:PanamaJoeGans.jpg

    File:PanamaJoeGans.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dcw2003 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    Image is in use, but is technically unsourced. FFD rather than CSD, as this is claimed to be a PD-US image. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Papachristou and family.jpg

    File:Papachristou and family.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DimitrisKo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    Image is unused, there's no claim of notability as to the subject asserted, and a cursory google scan didn't show anything obvious. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Papachristou Family Photo.jpg

    File:Papachristou Family Photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DimitrisKo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    Unused, No notability of subject asserted. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Papachristou Harvest.jpg

    File:Papachristou Harvest.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DimitrisKo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    Unused, lo-res, No notability of subject asserted. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Paremmakkal Thoma Kathanar.jpg

    File:Paremmakkal Thoma Kathanar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Unknownuserkottayam123 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    No longer convinced this is acceptable for Commons, the source field reading "on my PC", Was this own as claimed or not? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    I rather doubt that the uploader holds the copyright as claimed. The uploader has a history of dubious copyright claims. The most telling example is this discussion. --Whpq (talk) 11:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Pasquale Vinaccia.jpg

    File:Pasquale Vinaccia.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jacqke (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    Dead source, Given the dates almost certainly PD-old, but not possible to confirm this as no artist/photographer given. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Passenger Lisr RMS Etruria.jpg

    File:Passenger Lisr RMS Etruria.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stavros1 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    FFD referal, as the original uploader retired. This image is PD in the US given the dates the ship was in service. However, the ship was nominally British, and thusly an image of it might have been from the UK. Other than the note it came from Ebay, there's no other source listed, and the back of the card hasn't been uploaded.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Patrick Gibbs.jpg

    File:Patrick Gibbs.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FruitMonkey (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    Unknown author, May well be a service photo (in which instance no issue), but the source given is a UK newspaper, which gives no credit line for the image. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Pep Comics panel.jpg

    File:Pep Comics panel.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Inkwell765 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    This is using the standard PD-US tag, however the work is from 1940. Anyone checked for a renewal so that the license tag can be updated? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Just did that. Pep Comics was checked for 1967 & 1968; there were no renewals. I added search details to the file and changed the license to PD-not renewed on the basis of the search. We hope (talk) 12:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Personal Photoshoot.jpg

    File:Personal Photoshoot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Biancadesai (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    Unusued, No notability of subject asserted. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:MTRlightrail.svg

    File:MTRlightrail.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JaJaWa (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    Should this be relicensed non-free logo? It was deleted on Commons as non-free/exceeding the threshold of originality. — Train2104 (t • c) 12:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Adolf Hitler color portrait.jpg

    File:Adolf Hitler color portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Joshualeverburg1 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    "Official" portrait is likely not own work. — Train2104 (t • c) 13:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Ankit BabuAdhikari.jpg

    File:Ankit BabuAdhikari.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Amrit Ghimire Ranjit (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    Uploader cites own work here but references magazine in caption [54] — Train2104 (t • c) 13:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Salnovin.jpg

    File:Salnovin.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Artaxerex (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

    Unnecessary picture showing a non-notable person damiens.rf 14:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Categories

    March 24

    NEW NOMINATIONS

    Category:Category-theoretic categories

    Nominator's rationale: If I understand rightly, "category-theoretic categories" merely means categories associated with category theory. If that's the case, this is simpler wording. The problem is that "category-theoretic" might have some precise meaning that I'm missing, and part of the reason for renaming is to ensure that nobody thinks the name has technical meanings more precise than category theory in general. I'm open to slight alternate versions, e.g. "Categories of category theory", if others think those alternate versions are better. Nyttend (talk) 23:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment. The purpose of the "category-theoretic" is to mark these as being the kind of category considered in category theory and to distinguish them from Category:Wikipedia categories. So if we're going to rename this one to "Categories in category theory", shouldn't we also consider renaming the other one to "Categories in Wikipedia" for consistency? That said, I don't have a strong opinion on this, only a mild preference that Keenan Pepper's comment on Category talk:Category-theoretic categories that "this page has one of the most ridiculous names in all Wikipedia" should continue to be true. But I don't think the proposed name makes much difference in that respect. On the other hand, the other suggested name "categories of category theory" is slightly problematic as it is too easily misread as meaning something like "categories of categories in category theory" which (if it existed) would be a subcategory with only one member, Category of small categories. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Suggestion, how about Category:Categories (mathematics)? Marcocapelle (talk) 18:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Fayenatic London 16:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Note: I have tagged the category as belonging to WikiProject Maths, and left a note at WT:MATH. – Fayenatic London 16:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment. The purpose of the category is to enumerate the objects of Cat (the category of all categories) that have a Wikipedia article. The strange title seems necessary to communicate that this is not about "categories" in the sense of Wikipedia categories and, moreover, that the inhabitants of the category under discussion should be objects of Cat, as opposed to articles that are about category theory in general. On my reading, the proposed change to Category: Categories (mathematics) fails this latter disambiguation. Sławomir Biały (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Category:Radio stations of the Instituto Mexicano de la Radio

    Nominator's rationale: A shorter name would permit the scope of the category to be broadened if needed — the main article isn't even in the category as it isn't a radio station. The shorter name would also match other categories on Mexico radio station groups. Raymie (tc) 05:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Cadenatres

    Nominator's rationale: This "network" only ever had three affiliates (it primarily reached people via cable carriage), and there is no need for it to have its own category as none of its shows had articles. Raymie (tc) 05:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Category:Tamaulipas radio templates

    Nominator's rationale: Expand scope of category to include television. There used to be several more templates but these have been TfD'd or reused elsewhere. Raymie (tc) 04:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)



    Redirects

    March 24

    Left and right bank

    These were hard redirects from late 2003 and early 2004 respectively to mid 2016. In mid 2016 they were converted to their current form. I converted these back to hard redirects about 3 weeks ago, and was reverted. These should be converted into hard redirects, proper disambiguation pages, or wiktionary redirects. Pseudo-disambiguation is inappropriate. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 18:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Anything but the current state. A soft redirect with a bit of text below is confusing for readers, and it's also not needed as that text is also present in the first lines of the targets. So at the very least, these could be converted back to hard redirects and the first lines of the targets trimmed down for clarity and links added to Bank (geography), which has a neat picture illustrating the concept (and is itself a possible target for the redirects). But still, I'm not sure the arrangement will be optimal. My knee-jerk reflex was to propose moving Left Bank (disambiguation) to the primary title Left bank per common practice, but – taking note of the difference in capitalisation – all but one of the entries on the dab page are proper names in title case. In that case maybe it could be moved to Left Bank? But this redirects to an article about the Left Bank of the Seine. Is this really the primary topic? – Uanfala (talk) 19:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Your mileage may vary

    Why does this page exist anymore? Google search for the phrase shows the Wikitionary's page first. If any purpose, it is confusing. Doesn't belong on Wikipedia. RoCo(talk) 15:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Keep as it meets the criteria for wiktionary soft redirects at Template:wi: there's no relevant wikipedia page (excluding TV Tropes, but that doesn't seem redirect-worthy), there is a relevant wiktionary entry and users are searching for it on wikipedia (on average 5 hits a day). – Uanfala (talk) 16:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep per Uanfala. Google is not the only way people search. Thryduulf (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    File:Logo PVV.png

    Orphaned file redirect. File was moved over three years ago. The name is not a plausible search term for the target. Safiel (talk) 17:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Comment this has been getting regular hits all the way through last year very recently suggesting that either it's linked from somewhere externally or was only orphaned very recently. I don't think that this is an implausible search term for the logo of an organisation known as PVV. Thryduulf (talk) 17:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Note The orphaning I believe occurred recently. I believe another user recently updated any links that pointed to this redirect. Safiel (talk) 18:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Create Commons:File:Logo PVV.png on Commons as a redirect to Commons:File:Name.jpg, then delete this redirect per {{Db-redircom}}. The acronym "PVV" is obviously ambiguous, and this is a method to fix the ambiguity issue. Steel1943 (talk) 17:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep - The instructions for moving a file state, "After moving the file, please replace all uses of the old file link with the new one.", hence all file redirects should be orphaned. The guidance concerning file redirects states, "As when a page is moved, a redirect is left when moving files. In most cases the file redirect should remain on the original page, except if the original name falls under one of the revision deletion criteria (purely disruptive, grossly insulting, privacy breaching, etc.) or shadows a file on Commons."; they shouldn't be suppressed unless they meet one of the criteria for speedy deletion. This means that there are many redirects in existence that are no different than this one (I create them regularly when renaming files), hence I see no reason to delete this one in particular. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 12:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 15:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Liberal bias

    This term is not restricted to the United States (e.g. [55] [56]). - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    3.14159265358979323846264338279

    Overly long (and inaccurate) redirect to Pi. By this point, it might be worth blocking creation of all titles starting with "3.14159", because there's little to no reason for someone to search beyond the fifth decimal place if they're looking for pi.  ONR  (talk)  05:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Delete. The length is not a problem at all, but the inaccuracy is. Thryduulf (talk) 13:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Comment Just so it's obvious where the inaccuracy is, the relevant digits of Pi are 3.141592653589793238462643383279. The 3 I have bolded is omitted in the nominated redirect. -- Tavix (talk) 15:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Templates

    March 24

    Template:United States squad 2017 CONCACAF U-20 Championship

    There is consensus that youth national team squads are not needed. — Michael (talk) 17:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. — Michael (talk) 17:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Template:Rhode Island Rams navbox

    Propose merging Template:Rhode Island Rams navbox with Template:University of Rhode Island.
    Program is not large enough (like the Florida Gators program) to have a separate navbox for athletics. The standard is usually just to include the athletic stuff into the main university navbox, which should be done here. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 04:08, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Support merge. This is an unnecessary navbox and the university one is better suited for a more encompassing coverage of University of Rhode Island topics. Jrcla2 (talk) 17:56, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Merge, but suggest interested parties (Corkythehornetfan & Jrcla2) with a vested interest in such classifications and templates ought also generate a broader policy discussion via a CFD for the categories and all such templates... which are currently based on both or either the teams & names in sports and the schools. Add in the by state features and the preferable solution gets pretty murky mighty fast. Having gone to college for a school without any modern teams to speak of, I have no interest. Others will. FrankB 04:13, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Oppose - This particular template is substantially identical to Template:Stanford Cardinal navbox (the most broadly successful college athletic program for 20 years) and better organized. So we're not reviewing a defective template with limited links. I'm sympathetic to an argument to merge all seven of these templates (Category:American college athletic program navigational boxes) with their corresponding academic navboxes, but oppose narrowly culling just this particular one from the seven. We should decide now, as cleanup/merge of seven is much easier than after it has inevitably spread to ~100 of the common FBS colleges. UW Dawgs (talk) 07:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
      • If this one is deemed to be unnecessary and a merge occurs, then it will be easy to open up the other 6 in a blanket nomination. Opposing the merge of this one on the grounds that all 7 should supposedly be lumped together is not a solid argument. Jrcla2 (talk) 03:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:08, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 14:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Template:Heads of the Ministries of the Government of India

    Propose merging Template:Heads of the Ministries of the Government of India with Template:Union ministries of India.
    Most of the links are similar. Further, most of the heads of ministries redirect to the ministries, so it would be good to keep only those heads, which have their pages. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 12:49, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Rubber stamp - this one seems to be a no brainer. The one with most offices doesn't have the office holder listed by the other. Styled the same too. FrankB 04:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 14:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Template:BritishTerrorism

    A bit of a strange intersection for a navbox, which also seems to contain other articles not related to its title. Not really useful as it stands. Would be better for category navigation. No article on the topic, fails WP:NAVBOX. -- Rob Sinden (talk) 12:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Keep people interested in British terrorism would be interested in the incidents and perpetrators listed in the template. It could probably be expanded to a portal.MeropeRiddle (talk) 18:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete - Per nom. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Template:Nueva Rosita TV

    With only one local station in this region of Coahuila (XHSDD-TDT), there is no need for this template other than to connect a bunch of redirects that don't even use it. Raymie (tc) 07:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Template:Baja California TV

    A template to link two templates. I've substed it on the templates using it so this can be safely deleted. Raymie (tc) 07:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Template:Televisa Chihuahua

    A template with little to no navigational use, as most of the links are redirects. Two other templates cover the actual articles that are linked here. Raymie (tc) 04:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Template:TV Azteca US Border O&O stations

    All TV Azteca stations are owned-and-operated, and most as network relayers do not qualify for articles. This template does not have much navigational use. Raymie (tc) 04:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Template:Chihuahua State TV

    This bottom-navbox template used to link to more templates. Most of those have been deleted as redundant. I've substed this now-useless template so it, too, can be deleted. Raymie (tc) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Template:NPB labeled map

    Subst: and delete--only one transclusion ―Justin (koavf)TCM 00:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

    I have also added it to List of NPB stadiums to show where the current stadiums are located. --TorsodogTalk 01:36, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
    Also, this template was made in the style of several other team templates such as Template:NFL Labelled Map, Template:MLB Labelled Map, Template:NBA labeled map and Template:MLS labeled map --TorsodogTalk 01:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
    • merge with one of the two articles and use LST to transclude in the other. Frietjes (talk) 17:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Question: Almost all of the templates located at Category:Labelled map templates are used in only one or two articles. Is there a reason this specific template is being singled out? It seems like by the logic of this deletion discussion the there should be no labeled map template at all? --TorsodogTalk 22:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 04:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Template:Paris Metro/line 3bis stations

    Single-use template; substitute in article. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
    to reply to me
    13:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Template:MTV Movie Award for Best On-Screen Transformation

    Not enough links to provide meaningful navigation. Also, do we really need a navbox for this kind of award? -- Rob Sinden (talk) 12:52, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

    • Strong Keep - since unlike me there are millions that care about MTV and things like honors, so will happily go from article to article seeing who last won such and such an award (a category, n'est pas?). So happens, this is a 'new award' here in the days of rampant CGI, so the lists population (Today) is small compared to those better populated by years of links like Template:MTV Movie Award for Best Kiss or many other MTV award categories. BUT.... fairplay makes me say, I believe strongly in those maintaining a project area have the say in managing its formatting and in this case, that means supporting the continuance of the template because they (who are editing MTV awards pages) are being consistent within the way they have organized and linked the year to year articles. These templates are clearly part of a family, and in effect are succession templates like we used to use with infoboxes to navigate between dynasts passing crowns and titles. That approach has been superceded by large and complicated infoboxes which incorporate the successor/predecessor information in the large templates.
    For example, a simple one has this partial set of lines:
    {{Infobox royalty|monarch
    | name            = Gustav I
    | succession      = [[List of Swedish monarchs|King of Sweden]]
    | coronation      = 6 June 1523
    | predecessor     = [[Christian II of Denmark|Christian II]]
    | successor       = [[Eric XIV of Sweden|Eric XIV]]
    | spouse          = [[Catherine of Saxe-Lauenburg]]<br>[[Margaret Leijonhufvud]]<br>[[Katarina Stenbock]]
    | issue           = [[Eric XIV of Sweden]]<br>[[John III of Sweden]]<br>[[Katharina Vasa]]<br>[[Princess Cecilia of Sweden|Cecilia, Margravine of Baden-Rodemachern]]<br>[[Magnus, Duke of Östergötland]]<br>[[Anna Maria of Sweden|Anna Maria, Countess Palatine of Veldenz]]<br>[[Princess Sophia of Sweden|Sophia, Duchess of Saxe-Lauenburg]]<br>[[Princess Elizabeth of Sweden|Elizabeth, Duchess of Mecklenburg-Gadebusch]]<br>[[Charles IX of Sweden]]
    }}
    

    ... and clutters the top of articles, yet we tolerate them. We can tolerate with these very unobtrusive bottom dwellers even easier. These tabulate titles at page bottom. I'd prefer an infobox approach myself, but that danged principal intrudes... they are maintaining the pages, have the interest, so get to make the rules. FrankB 04:40, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:08, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    Miscellany

    Deletion review

    24 March 2017

    Timeline of Amazon.com (closed)

    Not_My_Presidents_Day

    Not_My_Presidents_Day (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

    Listing for the page creator, who believes that the discussion and consensus were premature, but refuses to open a discussion to overturn it. TheDracologist (talk) 01:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

    • I personally Endorse the original consensus, per the discussion. TheDracologist (talk) 01:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep article: I'm tired of trying to explain my actions on so many different pages, but I will just reiterate here that I strongly disagree with the merge vote and strongly vote to keep this article, which is very close to being nominated for Good article status. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    @TheDracologist: Do you care to explain why you'd like to merge a near-complete article with 100+ reliable sources into an (arguably already too) long article, Protests against Donald Trump? User:Megalibrarygirl and I will be nominating this article for Good status very soon, so we're in this odd state of limbo re: merge vs. Good article. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    I think the reasons laid out in the AfD by users far better at articulating themselves than me still stand. Also, @Another Believer:, do you care to explain why you were trying to ignore/undermine the result of an AfD with no attempt to create a discussion to overturn the current consensus? TheDracologist (talk) 01:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Honestly, can we please keep the chastising to a minimum? Everyone has been acting in good faith throughout this article's history. Can we focus on the future of this article? ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Sorry for getting defensive. For some reason, I read your comment to me as accusatory. TheDracologist (talk) 01:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Oh, then my apologies as well, as that was not my intent. I genuinely want to know why someone would want to merge this article. I see this as a quality article about a notable event that is accurate, neutral, well-written, and reliably sourced by more than enough secondary coverage. Let's keep the article (hell, let's even promote it to Good article status!), and move on to improving the encyclopedia in other ways. ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    I think the event is not likely to have enough lasting impact to be notable enough for its own article and is therefore better off as a subsection of a broader article. TheDracologist (talk) 02:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Keep – This article was vastly expanded and is well-sourced, and the target article is already long; merging them would make no sense at this point. Sure, the AfD discussion yielded a Merge outcome but opinions were split (for example, I !voted Delete quickly after nomination, but some editors such as Jdcomix switched from Strong Merge to Keep in a matter of hours) and today's article would probably get a Snow Keep. Regarding process, if some people think the AfD outcome must be enforced first, I reply WP:IAR and WP:NOTBURO. Final note: the AfD was closed as Merge with an absolutely correct reasoning by Sandstein at the time, therefore DRV should not seek to Overturn the outcome, just acknowledge that the article has evolved so much that the prior decision cannot apply to its current state. — JFG talk 02:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Endorse merge result. There's really no other way that AfD could have ended. Reyk YO! 11:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Oyi. This likely belongs on the article talk page or an RfC, not an AfD. Overturn to NC because AfD is the wrong place to discuss merging an article that clearly meets our inclusion guidelines and frankly the merge !votes really are mostly expressing an editorial opinion rather than anything else. There were limited references to NOTNEWS and EVENT, but no real discussion how this topic related. That said, there wasn't consensus to keep either. Hobit (talk) 14:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Geez, in how many different spaces do we need to have this discussion? No one seems to know the right venue for this debate... (I'm not directing my comment at Hobit, just generally frustrated by the many different places this debate has spread.) ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:XfD_today&oldid=768967260"
    This content was retrieved from Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:XfD_today
    This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Wikipedia:XfD today"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA