Wikipedia:WikiProject Time/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to the assessment department of the Time WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Time related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Time}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Time articles by quality and Category:Time articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Time WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions

Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Time}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Time|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Time articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Time articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Time articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Time articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Time articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Time articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Time articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Time articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Time articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Time articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Time articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Time articles)  Draft 
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Time articles)  File 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Time articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Time articles)  Project 
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Time articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Time articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Time articles)  ??? 

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Time articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Quality scale

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Time}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Time| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale

Label Criteria Examples
Top Core topics about Time. Generally, these topics are sub-articles of the main Time article, vital for the understanding of Time or extremely notable to people outside of the field of the study of Time. This category should stay limited to approximately 100 members. Biographies should be limited to the top one or two people in a particular field or persons of the greatest historical importance
High Topics that are very notable within the field of Time, and well-known outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia.
Mid Topics that are reasonably notable on a national level within Time without necessarily being famous or very notable outside of the field.
Low Topics of mostly specialized interest or those that are only included for complete coverage or as examples of a higher-level topic; peripheral or trivial topics or topics that have only a limited connection to Time.

Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


  • Should all months (January-->December) be High Importance. They are very notable within the field of Time and are included in print encyclopedias. Callanecc (talk) 13:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Assessment log

Time articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

December 22, 2017

Removed

December 20, 2017

Reassessed

  • Birch Memorial Clock Tower (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

December 14, 2017

Reassessed

  • Countdown (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Mammetun (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

December 13, 2017

Reassessed

  • Timestamp (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

December 12, 2017

Reassessed

  • Cosmic time (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

  • Project:Userboxes/Time (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Project-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).

December 11, 2017

Assessed

December 9, 2017

Reassessed

December 5, 2017

Assessed

  • Goki calendar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Taien calendar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

December 4, 2017

Assessed

  • Genka calendar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Gihō calendar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

December 2, 2017

Assessed

November 29, 2017

Assessed

  • Yekatit 12 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

November 28, 2017

Removed

  • Men for All Seasons (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

November 25, 2017

Assessed

November 21, 2017

Assessed

  • Egeria (mythology) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Nona (mythology) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Removed

  • Egeria (deity) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Nona (deity) (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

November 20, 2017

Assessed

  • Porhalaan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

November 19, 2017

Reassessed

November 18, 2017

Reassessed

  • Time management (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to High-Class (rev · t).

November 16, 2017

Assessed

November 12, 2017

Reassessed

  • Time banking (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

Removed

  • Time from NPL (talk) removed. Quality rating was B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).

October 30, 2017

Reassessed

  • Time banking (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

October 29, 2017

Assessed

October 21, 2017

Assessed

  • Middle chronology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as High-Class (rev · t).

Removed

  • Middle Chronology (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was High-Class (rev · t).

October 19, 2017

Assessed

Removed

October 11, 2017

Assessed

October 10, 2017

Assessed

  • October 1917 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Songkran (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

October 9, 2017

Assessed

October 7, 2017

Assessed

October 2, 2017

Reassessed

Assessed

September 28, 2017

Removed

  • Witching hour (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).

September 24, 2017

Assessed

September 22, 2017

Assessed

September 20, 2017

Removed

  • ClickTime.com (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

September 19, 2017

Assessed

  • September 1917 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 16, 2017

Removed

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment&oldid=528197165"
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Wikipedia:WikiProject Time/Assessment"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA