Wikipedia:WikiProject Missouri/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Missouri WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Missouri. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Missouri}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Missouri articles by quality and Category:Missouri articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Missouri WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Missouri}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Missouri
|class=
|importance=
|attention=
|collaboration-candidate=
|past-collaboration=
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review=
|needs-infobox=
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Missouri articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scale

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Missouri}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Missouri| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Missouri.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to certain audiences—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-Class}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High {{High-Class}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid {{Mid-Class}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low {{Low-Class}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

  1. Cooper Tennis Complex - Taxman1913 (talk) 10:49, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
  2. Missouri gubernatorial election, 2016 - Article needs assessment. --TommyBoy (talk) 23:29, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  3. History of Missouri - I haven't made significant changes to it, but it seems quite detailed and thorough, and has plenty of references. I moved it up to C class from start class because I wasn't sure where to put it, but it's possible that it should be higher. Tamwin (talk) 00:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
  4. St. Louis Lambert International Airport - Currently C-class, but hasn't been reviewed in over a decade and has since been expanded and improved upon significantly. Digital inf3rno (talk) 03:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Assessment log

Missouri articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

October 8, 2018

Reassessed

  • KLUH (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Margo McNeil (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

Removed

  • Brett Gensler (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

October 7, 2018

Assessed

Removed

  • Holmes-Dakin Building (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

October 6, 2018

Renamed

Reassessed

  • Jayce Tingler (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

  • The Maryville Forum (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

October 5, 2018

Assessed

  • 2019 Kansas City Royals season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • 2019 St. Louis Cardinals season (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Bob Dalton (outlaw) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Edna Fischel Gellhorn (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Evan Boehm (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • George Smith (chemist) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Kathleen Nolan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Monette Cummings (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Robert Rennick Dalton (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).

October 3, 2018

Reassessed

Removed

October 2, 2018

Reassessed

Assessed

Removed

  • Abbott Branch (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).
  • McDonnell Aircraft (talk) removed. Quality rating was C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Mid-Class (rev · t).

October 1, 2018

Assessed

September 30, 2018

Reassessed

  • Mayme Ousley (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Penny Hubbard (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).

September 29, 2018

Reassessed

  • Elaine Gannon (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).
  • M. Louise Thomas (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class (rev · t).

September 28, 2018

Renamed

Reassessed

  • Tammy Dickinson (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

Removed

September 27, 2018

Reassessed

  • Whittenburg Creek (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Removed

  • Willis White (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 26, 2018

Assessed

  • Pam Hupp (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Phrack (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 25, 2018

Reassessed

Assessed

Removed

September 24, 2018

Reassessed

  • Petronelle Sombart (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

September 23, 2018

Assessed

Worklist

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missouri/Assessment&oldid=858860121"
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missouri/Assessment
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Wikipedia:WikiProject Missouri/Assessment"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA