Wikipedia:WikiProject European Microstates/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to the assessment department of the European Microstates WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about European Microstates or the people of European Microstates. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject European Microstates}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:European Microstates articles by quality and Category:European Microstates articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Index · Statistics · Log

Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the European Microstates WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject European Microstates}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject European Microstates
|class=
|attention=
|collaboration-candidate=
|past-collaboration=
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review=
|needs-infobox=
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed European Microstates articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scale

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of European Microstates.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-Class}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High {{High-Class}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid {{Mid-Class}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low {{Low-Class}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

We are currently discussing which articles should be counted as being of Top-importance at Wikipedia:WikiProject European Microstates/Assessment/Top-importance articles.

Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

October 8, 2018

Reassessed

October 7, 2018

Reassessed

Assessed

October 6, 2018

Reassessed

October 5, 2018

Reassessed

October 4, 2018

Reassessed

Assessed

October 3, 2018

Reassessed

October 2, 2018

Reassessed

  • 1932 Monaco Grand Prix (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).
  • 1933 Monaco Grand Prix (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).
  • Paréage (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Pic dels Aspres (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Roman Italy (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Women in Europe (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Top-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Category:1950 establishments in Monaco (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

October 1, 2018

Reassessed

September 30, 2018

Reassessed

September 29, 2018

Reassessed

September 28, 2018

Reassessed

September 27, 2018

Reassessed

Assessed

  • Year of three popes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

Removed

  • Year of Three Popes (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

September 26, 2018

Reassessed

  • 1932 Monaco Grand Prix (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).
  • 1933 Monaco Grand Prix (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).
  • Napoleon (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to GA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Napoleon III (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Women in Europe (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Top-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Category:1950 establishments in Monaco (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

  • Alpspitz (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

September 25, 2018

Reassessed

September 24, 2018

Reassessed

Assessed

Removed

September 23, 2018

Reassessed

September 22, 2018

Reassessed

Assessed

Removed

September 21, 2018

Reassessed

Assessed

  • Augstenberg (Liechtenstein) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Zigerbergkopf (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

September 20, 2018

Reassessed

Assessed

  • Xavier Fernandez (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Removed

  • Xabier Fernández (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 19, 2018

Reassessed

Assessed

  • Christoph Meier (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 18, 2018

Reassessed

Assessed

September 17, 2018

Reassessed

September 16, 2018

Reassessed

Assessed

September 15, 2018

Reassessed

Assessed

September 14, 2018

Reassessed

Worklist

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_European_Microstates/Assessment&oldid=174175844"
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_European_Microstates/Assessment
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Wikipedia:WikiProject European Microstates/Assessment"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA