Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Crystal personal.svg WikiProject Biography
General information (edit · changes)
Work groups and subprojects
Things you can do (edit)

Biography article statistics

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Biography. This department focuses on assessing the quality and priority of Wikipedia's biography articles. A quality rating estimates how close an article comes to a professional standard. The priority or importance rating estimates the relative importance of a subject when compared to other biographical articles.; this rating can help project members to prioritise editing work. These quality and priority rating systems were established by the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team, and are customised by WikiProject organisers.

An article's rating is set in the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Biography}} project banner on the article's talk page. Setting the class value causes the article to be listed in the corresponding sub-categories under Category:Biography articles by quality, and to lists generated by bots such as.

Frequently asked questions

How can I request an article assessment?
Add it to the assessment request queue below. If you'd like someone to write some constructive feedback about the article, you can request a peer review from editors outside WikiProject Biography. At present, WikiProject Biography's peer review is backlogged.
Who can rate an article?
Anyone can rate a biographical article, but if you revised an article enough to change its potential rating, or if you have a conflict of interest, someone else should review it. A rating higher than B-class requires a more formal review process.
What if I disagree with a rating?
Ask the reviewer what they think the article needs (preferably on the article's talk page). You can also (re)list the article in the assessment request queue, or directly ask a WikiProject Biography member to review it.
Are the ratings subjective?
Reviewers are expected to follow Wikipedia's article quality grading criteria.
How can I begin assessing articles?
See "How to assess an article" below.

Light bulb iconB If you have a question not answered here, please feel free to ask on the assessment talk page.

How to assess an article

Read the criteria in the quality scale, and determine which grade best reflects the state of the article. If the quality grade you chose differs from the one on the article's talk page, set the grade by changing the class parameter for each WikiProject banner, like this:

{{WikiProject Biography |class=Start}}

If the article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography but does not have a {{WikiProject Biography}} banner on its talk page, add the banner.

You can find articles to rate in Category:Unassessed biography articles. This is a list of talk pages that have a banner with an incomplete assessment.

There's more to article assessment than just quality and priority grades. See {{WikiProject Biography}} for complete instructions.

Class parameter

The valid values for the class parameter are:

Articles without a valid class are listed in Category:Unassessed biography articles. Quality ratings should adhere to the quality scale below.

It is not necessary to add a class parameter to talk pages that do not correspond to ordinary articles. For categories, disambiguation pages, redirects, etc., the class is implicit.

Priority parameters

{{WikiProject Biography}} has separate priority parameters for specialised sub-projects and work groups. WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers has its own priority scale; please use it. For all other work groups and WikiProjects listed here, use WikiProject Biography's priority scale.

The valid values for all priority parameters are: Top, High, Mid, and Low.

Do not use priority parameters for non-articles (redirects, disambiguation pages, categories, etc.).

Quality scale

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Priority scale

Priority must be regarded as a relative term. If priority values are applied within this project, these only reflect the perceived importance to this project and to the work groups the biography falls under. An article judged to be "Top-Class" in one context may be only "Mid-Class" in another project. The criteria used for rating article priority are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it).

Article importance grading scheme
Label Criteria Examples
Top High probability that non-Historians would look this up. Limited to the top 200 biographies. Must have had a large impact outside of their main discipline, across several generations, and in the majority of the world. For instance, Einstein, brilliant physicist, but his theories have affected people outside of physics and in many other countries besides his nation of origin and several generations. His ideas have changed the way people think. No member should give this rating to any biography without first getting Project approval from the other members. Albert Einstein
High Must have had a large impact in their main discipline, across a couple of generations. Had some impact outside their country of origin. Patrick Henry
Mid Important in their discipline. John Seigenthaler, Sr.
Low Subject is notable in their main discipline. Morena Baccarin

Requesting an assessment

If you would like a WikiProject Biography volunteer to rate an article, please feel free to list it below.

This is a quality rating only. Reviewers usually do not comment on the article. For more detailed feedback, you can request a peer review.

Articles submitted to the list below can be rated up to B-class. For higher assessments, see Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions and Wikipedia:Featured article criteria.

Reviewers: For general assessment instructions, see "How to assess an article" above. After you assess an article, please delete it from the list.

If you checked for B-class readiness, please add a short section titled "B-class review" to the article's talk page. If you do not believe the article meets the criteria for B-class, explain what improvements it needs in order to pass. If it passes, confirm in writing that you checked the article for all B-class criteria, and that it passed.

Edit this section and add request to the end of the list.

  1. Luang Por Dhammajayo -Farang Rak Tham (talk) 20:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  2. Luang Por Dattajivo--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 22:29, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
  3. Russell G. ClearyKellypm94 (talk) 16:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
  4. Edna Meade Colson - WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 17:34, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
  5. Grace Crunican - Orygun (talk) 20:33, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  6. Toby Orenstein Thsmi002 (talk) 02:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  7. Denny Weston Jr Thsmi002 (talk) 02:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  8. Tom_Hess_(guitarist) - Khargas (talk) 22:49, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
  9. Brian_Banks_(politician) - norris.michaelj (talk) 10:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
  10. Tenisha_Yancey_(politician) - norris.michaelj (talk) 10:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
  11. Boozoo ChavisNOLA1982 (talk) 17:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
  12. Chace Crawford Rfl0216 (talk) 03:02, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
  13. Ibrahim NjoyaKhu'hamgaba Kitap talk 19:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
  14. Agnes of Périgord --David (talk) 23:26, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
  15. Jack Radcliffe - Luminum (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
  16. Ken Kesey - Brian Fenton (talk) 20:47, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
  17. Leighton MeesterRfl0216 (talk) 00:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
  18. Tsunesaburō Makiguchi - Kelvintjy (talk) 05:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
  19. Daisaku Ikeda - Kelvintjy (talk) 05:49, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
  20. John Draperahess247 (talk) 22:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
  21. Melvin WineNOLA1982 (talk) 22:06, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
  22. Isabelo de los Reyes -NyanThousand (talk) 07:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
  23. Oriol JunquerasObi2canibe (talk) 20:40, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
  24. Carles PuigdemontObi2canibe (talk) 20:40, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
  25. Lennaert Nijgh - SubjectIsDead (talk) 14:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
  26. Havilah Babcock - Schwiiz (talk) 20:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
  27. Jackson Crawford - Schwiiz (talk) 20:44, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
  28. Rosie Batty - Jack N. Stock (talk) 00:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
  29. Kim Min-jae (footballer) - Fbgpwns5277 (talk) 16:05, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
  30. Alice Mayhew - Jaldous1 (talk) 18:48, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
  31. Gail Sheehy - Jaldous1 (talk) 18:49, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
  32. Vanessa JenningsNOLA1982 (talk) 21:31, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
  33. Augustin-Jean Fresnel: Since early December 2017, this article has been completely rewritten and restructured, massively expanded, and exhaustively checked against a long list of sources. Case for "High" importance: Completely reconstructed his main discipline (physical optics), with effects continuing to the present day, knowing no borders. Case for "Top" importance: High probability that any elementary physics student would look this up. Improvements to lighthouses had a large impact on travel and trade, globally, for more than a century. — Gavin R Putland (talk) 10:11, 20 January 2018 (UTC).
  34. Pale Waves - EL Foz87 (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
  35. Josh Ho-Sang - HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 08:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
  36. Otelo Saraiva de Carvalho - Jp16103 16:59, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
  37. Bidhu Bhushan Ray - Amuk (talk) 07:04, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
  38. Jeremy Glinoga
  39. Draft:Nestor Mesta Chayres - (talk) 17:02, 27 February 2018 (UTC)PS
  40. Ramesh Chandra Majumdar (physicist) - Amuk (talk) 05:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
  41. Kambadur Muralidhar - Amuk (talk) 12:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
  42. J-HopeNyantatata ^-^ (Say hi!) 21:03, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
  43. Grace Cadell - Papamac (talk) 10:32, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
  44. Hugh Thomson - extabulis (talk) 18:50, 14 March 2018 (UTC)


Current status

Historical counts

Monthly changes

Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Biography articles by quality log


The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Biography articles by quality
This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.
Retrieved from ""
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia :
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA