Page semi-protected

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Administrator instructions

New page reviewer

(add requestview requests)


Reapplying after trial run as requested by Amanda. Previous application. {{u|zchrykng}} {T|C} 21:32, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by DeltaQuad (expires 05:36, 23 September 2018 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 21:40, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Okay... not sure what is up with that. I thought I received a notification that the right had been removed. Can withdraw this until it actually ends if desired. {{u|zchrykng}} {T|C} 21:46, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
@Zchrykng: It does not expire until 05:36 UTC, September 23, 2018 -- Amanda (aka DQ) 22:00, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 Request withdrawn until it actually expires. Sorry for the mix up. {{u|zchrykng}} {T|C} 02:52, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Okay, it has actually expired now. DeltaQuad thanks for the consideration. {{u|zchrykng}} {T|C} 20:07, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 Done With Joseph Kropschot, if there are no sources with a BLP, it needs to be WP:BLPPRODed. I didn't go through all of them but hit at least a dozen, and i'm comfortable granting this permanently. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:12, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

User:ZI Jony

I would like to request new page reviewer rights to reduce NPF backlog, because as a AFC reviewer I'm using New Pages Feed to review AFC drafts and in the same time I can work also for patrolling new pages. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 18:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Not done due to several concerns:
  1. Draft:Stefanie Zadravec You declined it for copyvio, right after it was cleaned
  2. Brace the Wave has references, yet you proded it for no references. And the two sources even look okish.
  3. Draft:BVG Group Ltd sources may need cleanup, but not to the level of WP:NCORP notability issues.
  4. Draft:Martin Schäuble meets WP:NAUTHOR.
Given the general non-explanation also given to users, my concerns can't be settled. I would recommend finding an AFC mentor. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 01:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)


I would like to review new pages. I constantly help on the new pages log to correct, improve and tag new pages with problems/needed fixing. I have experience in how a good article must look like and what needs to be done to perfect such. I also noticed most articles on here are from mostly English speaking countries and lacking in countries where English isn't spoken and hope to contribute and find more in that area. I have knowledge on how a good article must look like; reliable sources, no copyright vio, meet our WP:GNG policies, more BLP sources for verifiability, proper categorization, de-opharning orphan articles, tagging WP:QD on articles not meeting our policies at first glance and tagging WP:AfD on ones where inputs by other knowledgeable editors arw required to determine discussion consensus etc. I hope to help out in making these contributions. 6Packs (talk) 02:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Not done You only have 4 days of New articles (mostly stubs), 4 days of AfC edits and 4 days of CSD requests. That's not enough for me to get a clear picture of your contributions by any means. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:57, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from ""
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia :
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA