Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:PERM)

Administrator instructions

Requests for permissions
This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, template editor rights and AutoWikiBrowser access.
Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".
Requests for permissions are archived regularly, please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.
Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 17:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


Permissions

Handled here

User groups

  • Account creator (add requestview requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
  • Autopatrolled (add requestview requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
  • AutoWikiBrowser (add requestview requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Microsoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the quick guide on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You only need to give a reason for wanting AWB access if you do not meet these qualifications.
  • Confirmed (add requestview requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
  • Extended confirmed (add requestview requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
  • File mover (add requestview requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
  • Mass message sender (add requestview requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have had made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
  • New page reviewer (add requestview requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation hoverbar.
  • Page mover (add requestview requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history.
  • Pending changes reviewer (add requestview requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
  • Rollback (add requestview requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
  • Template editor (add requestview requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.

Handled elsewhere

Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

Removal of permissions

If you wish to have any of your permission flags (except administrator) removed, you should contact an administrator. If you want your administrator flag removed, you should contact a bureaucrat.

This is not the place to request review of another user's rights. If you believe someone's actions merit removal of a permission flag, you should raise your concern at the incidents noticeboard.

Note: The bureaucrat, checkuser and oversight flags cannot be removed using this process page; those need to be posted at Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

Process

Requestors

To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting permission.

Any editor may comment on requests for permission.

Administrators

Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, mass message sender, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

Current requests

Account creator

User:Sodapopinski7

I'm doing an editing workshop on 9/23 with a group of middle-school students. There will be 18 people total. Sodapopinski7 (talk) 02:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 Done Will expire on 24 September MusikAnimal talk 18:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

User:RamboRock

I'm sitting vacant at home I like working in Wikipedia: Will you make me see the page?I have a lot of love for Wikipedia. This is the work I do throughout my day that I work in Wikipedia, will you give me this job RamboRock (talk) 14:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done - two day old account Primefac (talk) 14:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

User:Kwamevaughan

Request for permission. All requirements met. Thanks Kwamevaughan (talk) 08:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has created roughly 9 articles. MusikBot talk 09:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Not done One of the requirements is that you've created 25 articles; you've done half that (12). The need for autopatrolled arises if you create articles that then enter the NPP pool, but your last creation was 22 months ago. Nevertheless, I started reviewing your youngest article and whilst I didn't check whether you introduced the issues or subsequent editors, there seemed a lot to do. Schwede66 05:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Mahveotm

been active in content creations lately. Want to reduce the burden on npp. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Not done You aren't quite there yet. When you are done with an article, what's generally missing is a heading for the references, the reflist template, DEFAULTSORT, and categorisation either in part or not at all. Also, allow for a clear line above headings. None of these are big issues, but taken together it's the stuff that NPP should pick up. I suggest you go through the edit summaries that I've just left on your last three articles, take that on board, create another five articles that show that you've got it, and come back here. Schwede66 19:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

User:جاي

جاي (talk) 04:10, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 04:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has created roughly 0 articles. MusikBot talk 04:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Not done Please create some content first. Jonathunder (talk) 05:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

User:RamboRock

I'm sitting vacant at home I like working in Wikipedia: Will you make me see the page?I have a lot of love for Wikipedia. This is the work I do throughout my day that I work in Wikipedia, will you give me this job RamboRock (talk) 14:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has created roughly 0 articles. MusikBot talk 14:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done - two day old account. Primefac (talk) 14:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser

User:Bonvallite

Bonvallite (talk) 12:06, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 12:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Bonvallite, how are you planning on using AWB? Primefac (talk) 13:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Primefac, I am patrolling and making edits, improving articles on City and Municipality of the Philippines past on suggestbot recomendation. To speed up my works. Thanks Bonvallite (talk) 14:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Wumbolo

To speed up my editing, I mainly plan to use it to correct typos such as miscapitalization and on redirects e.g. adding rcats Wumbolo (talk) 09:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

User:RamboRock

I'm sitting vacant at home I like working in Wikipedia: Will you make me see the page?I have a lot of love for Wikipedia. This is the work I do throughout my day that I work in Wikipedia, will you give me this job RamboRock (talk) 14:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has approximately 14 non-automated edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 14:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done. Meets none of the requirements. Primefac (talk) 14:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


Confirmed

User:Chetch4

To update live statistics with accuracy Chetch4 (talk) 06:21, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 06:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done - Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you're used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5% of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that 95% of the articles can use your help right now! — xaosflux Talk 13:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Welfare1

Welfare1 (talk) 02:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 02:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done. No reason given. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Mariacf

- I can't edit my company's page. Please confirm my account. Mariacf (talk) 14:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 14:10, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done. User blocked. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

User:RamboRock

I'm sitting vacant at home I like working in Wikipedia: Will you make me see the page?I have a lot of love for Wikipedia. This is the work I do throughout my day that I work in Wikipedia, will you give me this job RamboRock (talk) 08:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 Done assuming good faith. — xaosflux Talk 13:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
With respect, Xaosflux, this user just applied for every perm out there. There's something fishy about this. Primefac (talk) 14:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
@Primefac: I'd decline all the other as well (I already declined EC). As far as +confirmed, if they wait 2 days they get it anyway, their initial edits do not appear vandalistic, and they do not seem to be trying to create new articles. I usually stretch AGF very far, and I hope this doesn't lead to a block in the next 2 days. I'll send one more caution to the editor. — xaosflux Talk 15:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Fair enough, I suppose this perm isn't a huge vandalism source. Primefac (talk) 15:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
@Xaosflux and Primefac: This is a sock of a globally locked master. I've blocked the account.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks @Ponyo: - AGF bites me again - but I won't give up! — xaosflux Talk 16:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Augusto curyy

Augusto curyy (talk) 12:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 12:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done. No reason given. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

User:RichBebo

I like working in Wikipedia: Will you make me see the page?I have a lot of love for Wikipedia. This is the work I do throughout my day that I work in Wikipedia, will you give me this permission. RichBebo (talk) 07:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Extended confirmed

User:XenonNSMB (alt)

Alt account of User:XenonNSMB for use on public computers. XenonNSMB (alt) (talk) 00:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Confirming --XenonNSMB (talk, contribs) 00:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 Donexaosflux Talk 01:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

User:RamboRock

I'm sitting vacant at home I like working in Wikipedia: Will you make me see the page?I have a lot of love for Wikipedia. This is the work I do throughout my day that I work in Wikipedia, will you give me this job. RamboRock (talk) 08:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done This access is only needed for a very small number of restricted pages, I will process your confirmed flag on the other page though. — xaosflux Talk 13:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

File mover

User:Timothyjosephwood

Because when I make a typo on a file name, it's very silly for me to have to template it and wait for someone else to move it. TJWtalk 18:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 Done Alex ShihTalk 12:53, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

User:جاي

جاي (talk) 04:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 04:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done Alex ShihTalk 12:50, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

User:RamboRock

I'm sitting vacant at home I like working in Wikipedia: Will you make me see the page?I have a lot of love for Wikipedia. This is the work I do throughout my day that I work in Wikipedia, will you give me this job. RamboRock (talk) 14:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done - two day old account. Primefac (talk) 14:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Mass message sender

User:RamboRock

I'm sitting vacant at home I like working in Wikipedia: Will you make me see the page?I have a lot of love for Wikipedia. This is the work I do throughout my day that I work in Wikipedia, will you give me this job.I will do my work well RamboRock (talk) 14:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done - two day old account. Primefac (talk) 14:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

New page reviewer

User:J947

I do a lot of NPP as evidenced by my CSD log and PROD log, of which I will note that the latter blue links are mainly articles referenced after a BLP PROD nomination. I also have experience with content creation, AfC, AfD, and anti-vandalism. Please consider this nomination carefully. J947(c) (m) 03:52, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 Comment: Hello J947, thank you for your request. Everything looked fine from the initial glance, but your last sentence was rather unusual and led me thinking if you were involved in some kind of controversies recently. So I have taken a even closer look than usual, and I think I know the reason now. In terms of statistics, 64.2% of your edits are semi-automated as a result of extensive use of XFDCloser since its wide release in March 2017, but I don't think this is a concern as that still leaves you with 2,879 non-automated edits. The content creation sharply decreased consequently, and no evidence of mainspace contribution after this expansion in May. Again, the fact that you have turned your interest to the policy areas of Wikipedia is also absolutely not an issue at all. The only issue that I am seeing is the approach to closing/relisting controversial AfD discussions, in which I cannot seem to find your updated opinion after being approached by TonyBallioni and BU Rob13 recently. My opinion is that your understanding of policy and the quality of your contributions are more than qualifying, as they have also been confirmed by Schwede66, another New Zealander in which you have worked closely with. I apologize for pinging, but I think their combined assessment would only be fair to this request. Regards, Alex ShihTalk 04:40, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
I'd support this. My largest concerns are that J947 sometimes can be a bit terse, which isn't great when dealing with NPP (see my talk page for a sampling of the different complaints you get). That being said, they are already doing NPP, doing it within policy, and generally benefiting the project. Giving the ability to mark pages as done will decrease work for others. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:52, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
@Alex Shih: Lately I have stopped closing controversial discussions and soft delete possible enactments, but I think relisting controversial discussions is normally quite uncontroversial. Also I will note that I've got a GAR on hold, so I expect a sharp up in my content contribs soon. J947(c) (m) 04:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Given that I've been asked, I shall state that in months gone by, J947 has at times made my watchlist go ballistic. That's stopped at some point, and now I know why (little content creation lately). I can't say that I've looked over J947's shoulder at NPP, so can't comment on that topic directly. What I have seen in terms of content creation has certainly be quite solid. Not sure whether that helps. Schwede66 05:11, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 Done Thanks all. Haven't heard from Rob but I think the concerns have been addressed. Of course, the access can always be revoked if misused. Happy editing. Alex ShihTalk 08:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Kwamevaughan

Hello, Kindly add me as a reviewer. All requirements met. Thanks Kwamevaughan (talk) 08:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

User:RamboRock

I'm sitting vacant at home I like working in Wikipedia: Will you make me see the page?I have a lot of love for Wikipedia. This is the work I do throughout my day that I work in Wikipedia, will you give me this job.I love this work very much, I will do this work with my hard work. RamboRock (talk) 14:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had an account for 1 days and has 14 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 14:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done - two day old account. Primefac (talk) 14:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Aguyintobooks

I would still like to participate in NPP, I did apply before but was rejected as some of my pages were in AfD 'heading for deletion', In general my article creations have survived well since and have not been deleted, although Bert Biscoe is still potentially heading for deletion (my work on the honors lists was not deleted) and other articles I have made have been nominated as well, like Mir Mohammed Raza, I doubt this is going to stop happening unless I stop making articles, especially as some of my creations are rather weak, so I am applying again (some other editors and Drstrauss suggested I should reapply). I am aware of how policy works, and I help out explaining policy to new users quite a bit. I have been doing some AfC reviewing recently as well. (it has added 700 semi-automated edits to my count, I can't figure out how many articles that is though). Only 30% of my edits are in mainspace, as I work on numerous other areas of the project as well. Α Guy into Books § (Message) -  15:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC) Α Guy into Books § (Message) -  15:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 16:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Page mover

User:In ictu oculi

I think the user would do well with the right as they're active at Requested Moves and would find it useful. — Zawl 13:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Support. This user is very knowledgeable in Page moving. Very active at Requested Moves. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 15:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 Done Alex ShihTalk 09:02, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
@Alex Shih: just wondering if you reviewed Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive955#Pattern_of_making_controversial_title_changes_without_RM_or_discussion_by_user_In_ictu_oculi before granting this right? Although there was no consensus for banning IIO from making page moves, there were a number of concerns raised there, which maybe should be considered before granting extra page move rights. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 10:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
@Alex Shih: I would concur with @Amakuru:. In ictu is certainly active at RM, but not uncontroversially. Not sure that page mover is appropriate here. Dohn joe (talk) 01:57, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
@Amakuru and Dohn joe: Thank you for the input. I have to admit that I was fazed by the 193,013 edits and 20,091 moves and missed seeing the AN/I discussion even though I did skim through the talk page in my review, so I apologize. Here are my thoughts after reviewing the contributions more closely.
Since the conclusion of the AN/I discussion (which lasted from 17 April to 21 May 2017), IIO's contributions sharply declined, which I assume is related to the discussion based on the move log. Ever since that discussion, IIO has performed 891 moves, and in these moves, I can only see one instance where the move was seriously contested, and the result of that RM discussion appears to have been resolved amicably. My only interaction with the editor seem to agree with the consensus that IIO is quick to make unilateral moves without checking relevant discussions, but in that interaction they were also quick to revert the mistake after I approached the editor. Reading through the RM discussions, IIO seem to respond to contested moves promptly with reasonable rationale usually. With these aspects taken into consideration, I was wondering if it's fair to propose that IIO deserves a chance to prove their competence with the tool? In the ideal scenario, the access to the page mover tool would add more responsibility to IIO, which will lead to more ways for them to be scrutinized if the controversial behaviour continues. When that happens, WP:PMRR can be easily invoked by any administrator, and it will help to generate a clearer consensus about this editor.
These are my opinions only. If the proposal still seems to be problematic, I will go ahead and apologize to IIO and revoke the page mover rights. Sorry about the long post. Regards, Alex ShihTalk 07:38, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
In my experience, most of In ictu's page moves are warranted/neutral, but a sizable minority (10-20% (?)) are questionable. In many cases, In ictu will take things through RM if called on it, but just as many times, they'll seem to go the unilateral route in areas where they should know better. That's what leads to most of the concerns, including the AN/I. I don't know how widely this page is viewed/watched, but I do know that other editors would likely have similar concerns to Amakuru here. Dohn joe (talk) 16:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
@Alex Shih: I didn't ask for the tool, and can accomplish most of the disambiguation work I do without it. I'd respect Amakuru's view. As you note with 193,013 edits and 20,091 moves you'd expect occasionally someone to ask a question. I have never hung on any edit. Life is too short. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Timmyshin

I have 74,459 edits over a span of 10 years including thousands of moves & move-related edits. This right will enable me to perform uncontroversial technical moves. Timmyshin (talk) 03:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Support. I will recuse myself for this one. I have seen this editor frequently in East Asian topics, and the editor is easily experienced, having demonstrated good understanding of relevant policies. I expect the page mover tool should be helpful in dealing with uncontroversial WP:CHINESE move requests. Alex ShihTalk 07:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

User:RamboRock

I'm sitting vacant at home I like working in Wikipedia: Will you make me see the page?I have a lot of love for Wikipedia. This is the work I do throughout my day that I work in Wikipedia, will you give me this job.I love this work very much, I will do this work with my hard work.I would be happy to work in Wikipedia. RamboRock (talk) 14:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done Malinaccier (talk) 14:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


Pending changes reviewer

User:Sabbatino

I would like to become a pending changes reviewer. I have been editing Wikipedia for almost 4 years, and I do it on a nearly daily basis. In my all time in Wikipedia I have not been blocked. I have read the Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes policy and other policies included there. – Sabbatino (talk) 14:12, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 Done Alex ShihTalk 14:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

User:RamboRock

I'm sitting vacant at home I like working in Wikipedia: Will you make me see the page?I have a lot of love for Wikipedia. This is the work I do throughout my day that I work in Wikipedia, will you give me this job.I love this work very much, I will do this work with my hard work.Give me this work, I will reduce my life. RamboRock (talk) 14:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had an account for 1 days and has 14 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 14:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done account is two days old. Primefac (talk) 14:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Rollback

User:Anish Mariathasan

As a pending changes reviewer, I have encountered many instances of vandalism, and have reverted them. It would be very useful to be a rollbacker so I can revert vandalism more easily. Thank you - Heptanitrocubane (talk) 20:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 22:10, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has 195 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 22:10, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done Thank you for your request, but I think there isn't enough counter vandalism activities at the moment to justify the need. Alex ShihTalk 08:57, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

User:L Manju

Hi. I am used to reverting problematic edits in manual way, but it would be more great to have rollback permission to do them more quickly and efficiently. So I would like to ask the rollback permission. Thank you. L Manju (talk) 10:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 Done You don't have a ton of specific vandal-fighting experience, but you seem to be experienced enough for this tool. Malinaccier (talk) 13:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

User:جاي

جاي (talk) 04:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 04:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has 37 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 04:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done Alex ShihTalk 07:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Alangi Derick

Currently maintaining our community article on Wikipedia called Silicon Mountain. This article is sometimes not edited the right way by volunteers and also consist of some lies that I need to fact checked making me to always be around the page and making sure information is correct. Would need this permission to rollback any edit that is not correct on Wikipedia after fact checking especially on our community page. Thanks Alangi Derick (talk) 19:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has 32 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 23:00, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only less than 50 edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:34, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

User:RamboRock

I'm sitting vacant at home I like working in Wikipedia: Will you make me see the page?I have a lot of love for Wikipedia. This is the work I do throughout my day that I work in Wikipedia, will you give me this job RamboRock (talk) 14:02, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has 14 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 14:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done Not enough experience. Malinaccier (talk) 14:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Template editor

User:RamboRock

I'm sitting vacant at home I like working in Wikipedia: Will you make me see the page?I have a lot of love for Wikipedia. This is the work I do throughout my day that I work in Wikipedia, will you give me this job.I love this work very much, I will do this work with my hard work. RamboRock (talk) 14:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done. Account is two days old (no need to run the numbers). Primefac (talk) 14:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions&oldid=796105040"
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:PERM
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Wikipedia:Requests for permissions"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA