Wikipedia:Files for discussion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Files for discussion (FfD) is for listing images and other media files which are unneeded or have either free content or non-free content usage concerns. Files that have been listed here for more than 7 days are eligible for either deletion or removal from pages if either a consensus to do so has been reached or no objections to deletion or removal have been raised. To quote the non-free content criteria, "it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created." For undeletion requests, first contact the administrator who deleted the file. If you are unable to resolve the issue with that administrator, the matter should be brought to deletion review.

Examples of what files you may request for deletion or change here:

  • Obsolete – The file has been replaced by a better version.
  • Orphan – The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia.
  • Unencyclopedic – The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in any Wikimedia project.
  • Low quality – The file is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns.
  • Copyright violation – The file might be used in violation of copyright.
  • Possibly unfree – The file is tagged with a freeness claim, but may actually be eligible for copyright in the United States.
  • NFCC violation – The file is used under a claim of fair use but does not meet the requirements.
  • NFCC applied to free image – The file is used under a claim of fair use, but the file is either too simple, or is an image which has been wrongly labeled given evidence presented on the file description page.

If you have questions if something should be deleted, consider asking at Media Copyright Questions.

What not to list here

  1. For concerns not listed below, if a deletion is uncontroversial, do not use this page. Instead tag a file with {{subst:prod}}. However, if the template is removed, please do not reinsert it; list the file for deletion then.
  2. For speedy deletion candidates as well, do not use this page; instead use one of the speedy deletion templates. See the criteria for speedy deletion. These are: duplicates (where both files are on Wikipedia), thumbnails, broken files, non-existent files, non-commercial, "by permission" files and files which are not an image, sound file or video clip and have no encyclopedic use.
  3. Files that have no source, have an unknown copyright, are unused or replaceable non-free, or are non-free without rationale can be marked so that they will be deleted after a week, and should not be listed on this page. Add one of the following to the file page:
    1. {{subst:nsd}} if a file has no source indicated
    2. {{subst:nld}} if a file has a source but no licensing information
    3. {{subst:orfud}} if a file has a non-free copyright template but isn't used in any articles
    4. {{subst:rfu}} if a file has a non-free copyright template but could be replaced by a free file
    5. {{subst:dfu|reason}} if a file has a non-free copyright template but the rationale isn't sufficient or is disputed
    6. {{subst:nrd}} if a file has no non-free use rationale
  4. Redundant or duplicate files do not have to be listed here. Please use
    1. {{db-f1|Full name of file excluding the "File:" prefix}} for speedy deletion if the other file is on Wikipedia, not on Commons
    2. {{now commons|File:NEW FILENAME}} if the file now exists on Commons, or {{now commons}} for files with the same name on Commons. (Don't nominate protected images, they are usually locally uploaded and protected since they are used in an interface message or in a highly used template, thus they are high-risk.)
  5. For blatant copyright infringements, use speedy deletion by tagging the file {{db-f9}}
  6. If a file is listed as public domain or under a free license, but lacks verification of this (either by an OTRS ticket number or a notice on the source website), tag it as {{subst:npd}}.
  7. Files that are hosted on Wikimedia Commons cannot be deleted via this process. Please use the Commons deletion page instead.
  8. Description pages with no local file, even though they are in the file namespace, should not be listed here.
    1. Redirects should be treated as in any other namespace: if no speedy deletion criteria apply, they should be listed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion.
    2. Local description pages with no associated file are speedy-deletable under criterion G8; use {{db-imagepage}}.
    3. Local description pages for files hosted on Commons are usually speedy-deletable under criterion F2 if there is no content relevant to Wikipedia; use {{db-fpcfail}}.
    4. Any other local description pages for files hosted on Commons should be listed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion.
  9. If a file is appropriately licensed and could be usable elsewhere, consider copying it to the Wikimedia Commons instead of listing it for deletion. Once copied to the Commons, it is eligible for speedy deletion per criterion 8 for files.
  10. If you are the uploader of the image, tag it with {{db-author}}.

Instructions for listing files for discussion

To list a file:

1
Edit the file page.

Add {{ffd|log=2018 June 22}} to the file page.

2
Create its FfD subsection.

Follow this edit link and list the file using {{subst:ffd2|File_name.ext|uploader= |reason= }} ~~~~

Leave the subject heading blank.

If the file has been replaced by another file, name the file that replaced it in your reason for deletion. Refer below for a list of other common reasons.

For listing additional files with the same reason, edit the first file section and use {{subst:ffd2a|File_name.ext |Uploader= }} for each additional file. Also, add {{ffd|log=2018 June 22}} to the top of the file page of each file other than the first one nominated.

3
Give due notice.

Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using {{subst:fdw|File_name.ext}}

  • Remember to replace "File_name.ext" with the name of the image or media
  • For multiple images by the same user, use {{subst:fdw-multi|First_file.ext |Second_file.ext |Third_file.ext}} ~~~~ (can handle up to 26)

If the image is in use, also consider adding {{ffdc|File_name.ext|log=2018 June 22}} to the caption(s), or adding a notice to the article talk pages. Consider also notifying relevant WikiProjects of the discussion.

State the reasons why the file should be deleted, removed, or altered. Also, state what specific action should be taken, preferably in bold text; this allows discussion participants and closers to better understand the purpose of the nomination. Some examples of nomination statements include:

  • Delete. Orphaned with no foreseeable encyclopedic usage.
  • Delete. Replaced by File:FILE2.
  • Free (public domain) file may actually be eligible for copyright in the United States. This photograph was actually first published in 1920, not 1926.
  • Remove from ARTICLE1 and ARTICLE2. The file only meets WP:NFCC#8 with its use in ARTICLE3.
  • Non-free file may actually be free. This logo does not seem to meet the threshold of originality to be eligible for copyright in the United States and should actually be tagged free using {{PD-logo}}.


Some common reasons for deletion or removal from pages are:

  • Obsolete - The file has been replaced by a better version. Indicate the new file name
  • Orphan - The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. (If the file is only available under "fair use", please use {{subst:orfud}} instead). Please consider moving "good" free licensed files to Commons rather than outright deleting them, other projects may find a use for them even if we have none; you can also apply {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}}.
  • Unencyclopedic - The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia (or for any Wikimedia project). Images used on userpages should generally not be nominated on this basis alone unless the user is violating the Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not policy by using Wikipedia to host excessive amounts unencyclopedic material (most commonly private photos).
  • Low quality - The image is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns.
  • Copyright violation - The file might be used in violation of copyright.
  • Possibly unfree file - The file marked as free may actually be non-free. If the file is determined to be non-free, then it will be subject to the non-free content criteria in order to remain on Wikipedia.
  • Non-free file issues - The non-free file may not meet all requirements outlined in the non-free file use policy, or may not be necessary to retain on Wikipedia or specific articles due to either free alternatives or better non-free alternative(s) existing.
  • File marked as non-free may actually be free - The file is marked non-free, but may actually be free content. (Example: A logo may not eligible for copyright alone because it is not original enough, and thus the logo is considered to be in the public domain.)

These are not the only "valid" reasons to discuss a file. Any properly explained reason can be used. The above list comprises the most common and uncontroversial ones.

If you remove a file from an article, list the article from which you removed it so there can be community review of whether the file should be deleted. This is necessary because file pages do not remember the articles on which the file were previously used.

Administrator instructions

Contents

Instructions for discussion participation

In responding to the deletion nomination, consider adding your post in the format
* '''View''' - Reasoning ... -- ~~~~
where "Delete", "Keep", "Comment", or something else may replace "View". In posting their reasoning, many editors use abbreviations and cite to the following:

Remember that polling is not a substitute for discussion. Wikipedia's primary method of determining consensus is through editing and discussion, not voting. Although editors occasionally use straw polls in an attempt to test for consensus, polls or surveys sometimes impede rather than assist discussion. They should be used with caution, and are no more binding than any other consensus decision.

Also remember that if you believe that an image is potentially useful for other projects and should be moved to Wikimedia Commons, in lieu of responding '''Move to Commons''', you can move it there yourself. See Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons for instructions.

Instructions for closing discussions

Nominations should be processed for closing after being listed for 7 days following the steps here.

Old discussions

The following discussions are more than 7 days old and are pending processing by an administrator:

For older nominations, see the archives.

Discussions approaching conclusion

Recent nominations

June 16

File:Eminem - Walk on Water.ogg

File:Eminem - Walk on Water.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Davey2010 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Taking to FFD since speedy deletion was contested. WP:Manual of Style/Music samples (WP:SAMPLE) says not to include more than 10% of a song's duration within audio samples, with 30 seconds being the absolute maximum length allowed. 33 seconds is therefore too long for a song. The track also happens to run for 5 minute and 3 seconds (totaling 303 seconds). Even if this hadn't exceeded the duration limit for samples, it fails criterion#8 of WP:Non-free content criteria (WP:NFCC) by offering no discernible enhancement for the article except for maybe providing an ear treat for Eminem and/or Beyoncé fans, which isn't by itself a strong enough reason to maintain the file. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep - Being 3 seconds over isn't a valid reason and is something that can easily be rectified, If went by your logic there would be no audio samples here, Anyway keep as It illustrates an educational article that specifically discusses the song from which this sample was taken. The section of music used is discussed in the article in relation to the song's lyrics, musical and vocal style, and may contain part of the song's chorus. –Davey2010Talk 09:28, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • There is nothing of encyclopedic value to be found in that sample which can't be sufficiently conveyed in prose. Please read the "Policy" section of WP:NFCC and its eighth criterion, especially if you haven't already, which says Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. No significant understanding of the song would be lost by removing this sample. I'm primarily concerned with meeting WP:NFCC requirements. We're also not just supposed to keep audio samples around just for the sake of having audio samples or for decoration. Snuggums (talk / edits) 12:45, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • At the time of uploading I'm convinced there were composition sections but maybe not, Regardless of that I disagree entirely and actually believe there is encyclopedic value in this audio sample, As I said by your logic we should would delete every audio file on every article ..... The file was added purely for encyclopedic value but that being said if others believe this isn't encyclopedic then I'm more than happy for it to go but at present I'm not really seeing a valid reason to do so. –Davey2010Talk 17:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a relevant or convincing point here and you know it. Keep the focus on THIS file here. Other files are for separate conversations. Anyway, how does it benefit the article at all per WP:NFCC requirements? I fail to see how it enhances any major aspect of the page in ways that words alone would be much less helpful for, and remember that WP:ILIKEIT isn't a good enough reason to keep the sample. One could easily write about the chorus and other lyrics within the "composition" section instead. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • I never said it was ..... I'm simply stating your logic here ...., As for the "ILIKEIT" - Please reread my reply where I stated and I will quote for you again "if others believe this isn't encyclopedic then I'm more than happy for it to go", I could also turn the tables and say to you "IDONTLIKEIT" isn't a reason for deletion, Well obviously I believe NFCC #8 is met but no doubt you disagree and that's fine, I believe this has contextual significance but like I said If others believe other wise then I'm more than happy for it to go - I'm entitled to my opinions and badgering me over it isn't going to change my mind .... I believe it should be kept rightly or wrongly and that's it. –Davey2010Talk 23:04, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

File:People's beach1.jpg

File:People's beach1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

File is available on Commons as File:People's beach.jpg. File was tagged with {{keep local}} however the rationale is more than insufficient. It is based on the assumption that Commons is a host for pornography and will be shut down by the FBI. See history for more details. Hiàn (talk) 01:11, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep The image's author has requested that it not be stored at Commons. The author's express wishes should be sufficient reason not to delete. No good reason has been provided why the image should be deleted. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Keep There's nothing in WP:F8 that requires a sufficient rationale. It states clearly there that an image can ONLY be deleted if The image is not marked as {{Do not move to Commons}} or as {{Keep local}}. Nothing at all in there about sufficiency of rationales. The marking is explicitly a sufficient rationale not to delete. — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
    • WP:F8 is about speedily deleting files, but the nominator didn't request speedy deletion but started a normal deletion discussion, so WP:CSD does not apply. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
      • Really?! Then why didn't the nominator cite the criteria for not keeping a local copy? Could it be that it was because there aren't any, and the closest thing we have is that statement in WP:F8? In the absence of guidelines that apply explicitly it's perfectly reasonable to cite guidelines that cover parallel or similar situations. — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama for text in the United States, so the file should be deleted from both Wikipedia and Commons on copyright grounds. Can be undeleted in 2105. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
    • Comment You've been trying to get this file deleted for years now. You know very well that freedom of panorama has nothing whatsoever to do with this, as I explained to you in painstaking detail in 2015 . — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 18:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This needs more input on the copyright question.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:45, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Keep - If the photographer wants a copy kept here then fine by me, I see no valid reason to delete at this present time. –Davey2010Talk 17:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Keep, per Keep comments above. The photographer seems fine with it here, so the bar seems to be met. Randy Kryn (talk) 19:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

File:The Fifth logo 2017.jpg

File:The Fifth logo 2017.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ZeusDrummer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-trivial logo, invalid public domain reason. BethNaught (talk) 10:29, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 03:08, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Toms College of Engineering for Startups academic block shadow.jpg

File:Toms College of Engineering for Startups academic block shadow.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sanalchandran23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Uploader is stating they are the copyright holder. The description indicates the image was taken for a prospectus for the college. And indeed, the image does appear at https://toms.ac.in/prospectus on page 3. OTRS confirmation would be required to confirm copyright status. Whpq (talk) 15:34, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

June 17

File:Larry Taunton speaks in Birmingham, AL in 2010.jpeg

File:Larry Taunton speaks in Birmingham, AL in 2010.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chadwickfish (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Flickr has never allowed CC-By-SA 3.0 as a license. Now, this account and file is deleted on Flickr. If moved to Commons, this would be deleted on the spot for failing a file review. (tJosve05a (c) 01:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Puerta Calle Clara Lair.jpg

File:Puerta Calle Clara Lair.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rick mercado19 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The file is -nc-nd on Flickr. (tJosve05a (c) 01:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Erin in White Blouse.JPG

File:Erin in White Blouse.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DavidsBlake (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Per the user upload log, the Flickr version is COM:license laundering. (tJosve05a (c) 01:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

File:WA-10 CeisGortonDraftProposal.png

File:WA-10 CeisGortonDraftProposal.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vanisaac (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is not a work of the American federal government, it's the work of the Washington state government [1]. Works by the Washington state government are not released under the public domain or any other suitable free license. xplicit 07:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

List of mayors of Ventura, California

File:George A. Randall.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cbl62 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 
File:Malvern Dimmick.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cbl62 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Floyd P. Shaw.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cbl62 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Paul Charlebois.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cbl62 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Jesse Allen Shaw.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cbl62 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Fernando Tico.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cbl62 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Ysidro Obiols.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cbl62 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:W. S. Chaffee.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cbl62 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Frank J. Dennis.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cbl62 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Marcus S. Johnson.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cbl62 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Charles Wesley Petit.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cbl62 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Albert R. Albinger.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cbl62 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Harriet Kosmo Henson.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cbl62 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Various non-free images being used in List of mayors of Ventura, California. Most of the individuals depicted in these image appear to be deceased, so it might be possible to use their respective images for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about them (if such articles exist); however, the use of non-fre images for individual entries in list articles is typically not considered acceptable per WP:NFLISTS and I don't see the way these particular images are being used to be an exception to long-established consensus.

There is, however, the possiblity that some of these images are old enough to be no longer eligible for copyright protection which means they could be converted to {{{PD-US}}, {{PD-US-no notice}} or some other form of public domain. It might also even be possible that some of these images are considered to be "official photographs" covered under {{PD-CAGov}}. If any of these can be converted to PD, then they would no longer be subject to Wikipedia's non-free content use policy and can be evenutally moved to Commons. More information is needed about these photos (like the information mentioned in WP:NFCC#10a) for their copyright status to be properly assessed to determoine how they should be licensed. If it turns out that all or some of these need to be treated as non-free content, then I don't think such files can be kept per Wikipedia's non-free content use policy.

There is another issue as well which needs to be addressed. All of these images appear to be photos of photos taken by the uploader using their iPhone. If this is the case, then there are actually two copyrights in play here: the copyright of the underlying work (i.e., the photo being photgraphed) and the copyright of the photo taken by the uploader. Since the photos taken by the uploader all seem to be simple mechanical reproductions of 2D-photos, they are likely not eligible for copyright protection; this means that any claim by the uploader of copyright ownership over them would not be allowed per WP:NFCC#1 regardless of the copyright status of the underlying work because basically someone else could take essentially the same photo and release it under a free license accepted by Wikipedia, It's not clear whether the uploader is claiming copyright ownership over their iPhone photos so no copyright license is provided for the photos themselves.

Suggest keep for any of the files for which the underlying work can be confirmed to be within the public domain, but only on the condition that the uploader agrees to release their iPhone photos under a free license accepted by Wikipedia; otherwise, all of the files will need to be deleted per WP:NFCC#1 regardless. Suggest delete for any file which needs to be licensed as non-free per WP:NFLISTS, unless there exists a stand-alone article about the individual in question where the photo can be used instead. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete (for all non-free files) As it stands, in theory this page could end up with 56 non-free images - that is not minimal usage on an article. Also such a page is not more than a gallery, which is not allowed for non-free images. Should anyone write a stand alone article for a person then that could have one image. Ronhjones  (Talk) 10:31, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete all the non-free: they are not allowed in lists per WP:NFLISTS but any that can be proven to be freely licenced should be kept. The onus for providing the copyright status is up to the uploading editor who should investigate them for this use. ww2censor (talk) 15:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete all the non-free: NFLISTS is pretty cut and dry on this issue. A non-free image used just to decorate a line in a table is an unacceptable fair use claim. --Majora (talk) 02:38, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Comment Hmm. There's a lot of gray area here. For the mayors before 1898; if the images were never published, then they may be PD per the Cornell copyright chart. If they were published after 1923, and copyright was renewed, then they may be subject to copyright. It's a gray area, and lacking further information we have no way of knowing, unless we walk into the Gallery of mayors, Ventura City Hall, 2nd floor. Of note also is that these works may have been created by the City of Ventura, and not by people who allowed their works to be used by the city. This is an important distinction. If they were created by the municipal government, then the images should be moved to Commons and Commons:Template:PD-CAGov applies. We just don't know. We can assume, but there's still a (albeit small) possibility at least some and maybe all of these images are subject to copyright. @Cbl62: your input here is really needed. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
My photographs are the easy part. I am happy to license my photographs as public domain. As for the original photos, they are all on display in Ventura City Hall. The images have plates identifying the person and the years in office. The display, however, does not identify the photographers. Nor is information provided as to publication history. I thought since the city displayed these as official mayoral portraits, their use on the mayor list would be appropriate (and quite helpful in illustrating the list). If I was wrong about that, then I must, of course, abide by the decision made here. Cbl62 (talk) 19:37, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:33, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I am wondering if it may be more appropriate to discuss each image separately, as (per Hammersoft) their copyright status may vary from image to image.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

File:32nd Mircea Voda Regiment(The defense of Negroponte Castle) -during Battle of Marasesti -1917;personal album of Aristide Razu,Commander of the 5th Romanian Infantry Division , with this Regiment 1917.jpg

File:32nd Mircea Voda Regiment(The defense of Negroponte Castle) -during Battle of Marasesti -1917;personal album of Aristide Razu,Commander of the 5th Romanian Infantry Division , with this Regiment 1917.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Aristiderazu (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 
File:32nd Mircea Voda Regiment (The Attack-1917) during Marasesti Battle ,personal album of Aristide Razu.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Aristiderazu (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

These are very interesting pictures and I'd love for them to be kept, but they need clarification on their copyright status. The description claims that they were part of an album given to Aristide Razu and published by his descendant. However, there's no information given about the actual photographers, who would hold the copyright. There is also no evidence the rights to the images were transferred to Razu or his heirs.

The uploading user was indefinitely blocked a few months ago for disruptive editing so I don't know if they'll be any help clearing this up. Also see c:COM:CRT#Romania for info on Romanian copyright law. clpo13(talk) 22:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Ooh, tough one. So, PD-US-1923, for which it is currently tagged, would not apply as it wasn't published before 1923. It sounds like these were personal photos given as a gift and never published. As such, for US law, we'd be looking at the life of the author + 70 years. And indeed the author, being the photographer who gave them as a gift, assuming he did not also sign away copyright. Hard to say for sure how long that person would've lived, but it doesn't seem a stretch to say they might've lived another 30 years, making these still in copyright. Now then, these were taken in Romania. Romania's laws are considerably different. See commons:Template:PD-RO-photo for a short overview. I'd want to look into the latter more before !voting. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:50, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:40, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Logo of Toms College of Engineering for Startups.jpg

File:Logo of Toms College of Engineering for Startups.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sanalchandran23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

College logo is unlikely to be under a free license. OTRS Would be required. Conversion to fair use cannot be done as the only usage is in sandbox and drafts. Whpq (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete, questionable licensing with no use in the main space. Likely to be a non-free logo. Salavat (talk) 14:42, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Toms College of Engineering for Startups academic block.jpg

File:Toms College of Engineering for Startups academic block.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sanalchandran23 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

See Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 June 16#File:Toms College of Engineering for Startups academic block shadow.jpg. This is the same image after some additional photoshopping. Licensing ownership still needs to be cleared up via WP:OTRS. Whpq (talk) 14:36, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Otto Dix Sy von Harden.jpg

File:Otto Dix Sy von Harden.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ceoil (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

  • I suppose it's fine to keep it in Otto Dix since it's the only example of a post-WWI artwork in the article. It looks fine in Sylvia von Harden too: it's an article about a deceased person and there are no known free images (I presume) and besides there's a lot of discussion about this painting in the article. Remove from all of the other articles.
Furthermore, WP:NFCC#10c states that The rationale is presented in clear, plain language and is relevant to each use. The person who posted the FURs to the file information page has simply duplicated the text in all sections (except that point 5 only appears in the last two sections) without adjusting the FURs for each usage. Therefore, all use of the file currently violates WP:NFCC#10c as the FURs are not relevant to each use. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Conditional keep for the Dix and von Harden articles provided the respective non-free uses can be better clarified, but remove for all of the other articles.
While I can understand the argument for wanting to use the file in the article about the painter, I think there should be more about it than just a caption and brief mention of the painting; otherwise, any non-free image of Dix's work could basically serve the same purpose. I'm also not sure that two non-free examples of his work are needed per WP:NFCC#3a, so it should be clarified why File:'Stormtroops Advancing Under Gas', etching and aquatint by Otto Dix, 1924.jpg and this file are both needed.
In addtion, I'm not so sure about the file's use in the main infobox of the article about von Harden. She has been dead quite a long time, so it seems that a non-free image of her for primary identification purposes should be OK per item 10 of WP:NFCI as long as WP:NFCC#1 is not an issue. (There do appear to be other images of von Harden available online, though I am not sure about their copyright status.) However, I think the main infobox image should be something that helps identify here as looked in real life, not as how Picasso "saw" her. There still might be enough context to justify the file's use outside of the main infobox per WP:NFCC#8, but the ratioanle should be revised to better clarify that.
Lastily, I don't think the uses in the other more general genre/list articles comply with WP:NFG, WP:NFCC#3, WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10c. I understand these articles are about art and images are important to them; I just don't feel that this non-free image is essential to them and the use of the file is more decorative than contextual as those terms are used in WP:NFCC. It seems that if the painting needs to be mentioned in the article than a link to the stand-alone article is more than sufficient per item 6 of WP:NFC#UUI and should be preferred to any overly simplistic or detailed content simply added to these articles just to try and justify the file's non-free use within them. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Keep certainly for the von Harden article. Do a Google book search for Sylvia von Harden and notice how, when she is mentioned, it is nearly always in connection with the Dix portrait. In the English-speaking world at least, it's probably what she's best known for. I think it should be kept in the Otto Dix article as well—an example of his work there is fair use. There's no free substitute, and the jpeg is low-res. Ewulp (talk) 01:23, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Max Beckmann's 'Self-portrait with Horn', 1938-1940.jpg

File:Max Beckmann's 'Self-portrait with Horn', 1938-1940.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC) Remove from all articles except Beckmann. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:20, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep Discussed in the Beckmann article; it's a low-res image; there is no free-use substitute. Ewulp (talk) 01:56, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Master-bill.jpg

File:Master-bill.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Never been to spain (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:55, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep important early work by an important artist...Modernist (talk) 02:13, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Christinasworld.jpg

File:Christinasworld.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ceoil (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:56, 17 June 2018 (UTC) Remove from all articles except the article about the work — JJMC89(T·C) 00:32, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Office in a small city hopper 1953.jpg

File:Office in a small city hopper 1953.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by VolatileChemical (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. File:Office in a Small City.jpg is used for the article about the work. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:57, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep important work by an important artist...Modernist (talk) 02:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
  • This not necessarily a discusssion about whether the file should be kept or deleted. It's a non-free file which is being used in multiple articles which means it might be possible for it to be kept in some, but removed from others. So, simply saying "Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion" is not as helpful as specifically stating which uses do (or don't) satisfy NFCC#8. At the same time, simply seeing "Keep important work by artist" also does not seem to specifically address how each particular use of the file satisfies the NFCCP, but is more of a WP:MEETOO or a WP:ITSOBVIOUS type of argument that doesn't address the specifics of the issue.
This file is being currently used in three articles: Edward Hopper#Selected works, History of painting#Towards mid-century and Western painting#Realism, Landscape, Seascape, Figuration, Still-Life, Cityscape. There also seems to be another non-free version of the painting File:Office in a Small City.jpg being used in Office in a Small City. There's really no reason to have two non-free versions of the same painting per WP:NFCC#3, so there's no need for both of these to be kept. I'm not sure which of the two should be kept, but maybe that is the first thing which should be resolved. As for the non-free use of the file which is kept, it seems quite acceptable for it to be used in the stand-alone article about the painting itself; however, the current uses in the other articles are questionable and should be more closely examined.
  1. The use in the Edward Hopper article seems pretty decorative to me and is something which can be more than adequately dealt with by a link to the painting's stand-alone article per item 6 of WP:NFC#UUI. Basically, the image is being used in a table of selected works which is problematic per WP:NFLISTS, WP:NFTABLES and WP:NFCC#8. The painting itself is not critically discussed anywhere in the article (it seems to be only mentioned by name three times: main infobox, the table, and a nav template), so the context required by NFCC#8 is lacking in my opinion. While non-free examples of an artist's work or particular style can sometimes be justified in articles such as this, there are some PD images of this work which could serve such a purpose. Moreover, a table of selected works by its very nature does not really mean that this particular file needs to be seen by the reader, and the use of four non-free images just to illustrate individual entries in a table is not really NFCC compliant in my opinion. Finally, two of the table's entries, Early Sunday Morning and Office at Night have links to external websites added in lieu of the non-free images being used in those articles. While linking to external websites like this might not be OK per WP:ELLIST, etc., it does show that a link instead of an image might be a reasonable alternative to actually displaying the file. Instead of link to an external website, a wikilink to the file's page could be used per WP:COLON; this could be done for the other non-free files being used in the table as well.
  2. The uses in the history and genre articles also have basically the same problem as the use in the Hopper article. Not only does neither article seem to have any critical commentary on the work itself, neither article even seems to even mention the painting by name. Rather, the file is added to a gallery of other files which is almost never allowed per WP:NFG. Furthermore in both articles, the PD-licensed File:Nighthawks by Edward Hopper 1942.jpg appears to be being used as an example of the same type of work by Hopper which means that a non-free example is not really needed for this purpose.
My suggestion would be to certainly keep one of the two files for use in the stand-alone Office in a Small City, and maybe possibly in the Hopper article if the file can be better incorporated into the article in a manner that meets NFCC#1 and NFCC#8: illustrating a single entry in a table as the file is currently being used doesn't do this in my opinion. However, I suggest remove for the other two articles since there's clearly no content in either of those articles about this particular painting which requires that reader see this file, so omitting the file is not going to be detrimental to the reader's understanding in anyway. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:11, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Freud, girl-white-dog.jpg

File:Freud, girl-white-dog.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cactus.man (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:58, 17 June 2018 (UTC) Remove from 20th-century Western painting, History of painting, and Western painting at a minimum since the work isn't discussed in those articles. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep important work by an important artist...Modernist (talk) 02:14, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:'Natura Morta', oil on canvas painting by Giorgio Morandi, 1956, private collection.jpg

File:'Natura Morta', oil on canvas painting by Giorgio Morandi, 1956, private collection.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wmpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC) Delete: None of the articles discuss the work. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep important crucial work by an important artist...Modernist (talk) 02:14, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

June 18

File:Kooning woman v.jpg

File:Kooning woman v.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Philosophistry (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep As with all the ones below, JJMC89 has first removed fair use templates with inadequate explanation, and then put these up here. This is not a good way to proceed. In any case, some fair uses remained, so I'm not sure what the point of "discussing" here is. Johnbod (talk) 12:46, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Keep all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 12:48, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • In the article Willem de Kooning, it is reasonable to have one example of a painting mad by this artist, but the article also contains a different image (File:Woman3.jpg). Per WP:NFCC#3a, there is no need to have two paintings in the article, so one of the paintings, either this one or the other one, will have to go. All other use of the file clearly violates WP:NFCC#8: the articles are not specifically about this panting, and per WP:NFC#UUI §6, you should link to the article about the painter (or the article about one of his paintings, for example Woman III) instead of including the painting in the articles. Additionally, all of the FURs violate WP:NFCC#10c as the rationales aren't relevant to each use. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Kline no2.jpg

File:Kline no2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Philosophistry (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep As with all the ones below, JJMC89 has first removed fair use templates with inadequate explanation, and then put these up here. This is not a good way to proceed. In any case, some fair uses remained, so I'm not sure what the point of "discussing" here is. Johnbod (talk) 12:46, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Keep all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 12:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete for several reasons:
    1. WP:NFCC#1: This is a painting by an American painter who died in 1962. It is therefore likely that some of his paintings were published (for example by virtue of having been exhibited at an art gallery) without a copyright notice or without a copyright renewal. It doesn't say where this painting has been published or whether there was a notice and/or renewal, so we have to assume that it is unfree; however, there should be no need to accept a non-free file on Wikipedia as it should be possible to locate a free painting.
    2. WP:NFCC#8: The articles Abstract expressionism, History of painting and Visual art of the United States are articles listing many different art styles. They do not need to contain any non-free files; instead, they should link to articles about art styles, paintings and painters, per WP:NFC#UUI §6.
    3. WP:NFCC#10c: It seems that the person who added the FURs didn't bother reading the FURs. The text is largely duplicated, and the FURs aren't relevant to each use. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:38, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Hans Hofmann's painting 'The Gate', 1959–60.jpg

File:Hans Hofmann's painting 'The Gate', 1959–60.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep As with all the ones below, JJMC89 has first removed fair use templates with inadequate explanation, and then put these up here. This is not a good way to proceed. In any case, some fair uses remained, so I'm not sure what the point of "discussing" here is. Johnbod (talk) 12:46, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Keep all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 12:55, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete Again, a painting by an American painter who was active when a copyright notice and renewal was required. Per WP:NFCC#1, we should not accept a non-free painting by him. Additionally, this is an unambiguous violation of WP:NFCC#8 in all articles except the one about the painter. Additionally, the FURs are invalid as they are not relevant to each use. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:'Canticle', casein on paper by Mark Tobey, 1954.jpg

File:'Canticle', casein on paper by Mark Tobey, 1954.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wmpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete Again, a painting by an American painter who was active when a copyright notice and renewal was required. Per WP:NFCC#1, we should not accept a non-free painting by him. Additionally, this is an unambiguous violation of WP:NFCC#8 in all articles except the one about the painter. Additionally, the FURs are invalid as they are not relevant to each use. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:45, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Oil painting by Sam Francis.jpg

File:Oil painting by Sam Francis.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wmpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:02, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete Again, a painting by an American painter who was active when a copyright notice and renewal was required. Per WP:NFCC#1, we should not accept a non-free painting by him. Additionally, this is an unambiguous violation of WP:NFCC#8 in all articles except the one about the painter. Additionally, the FURs are invalid as they are not relevant to each use. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:46, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Robert Motherwell's 'Elegy to the Spanish Republic No. 110'.jpg

File:Robert Motherwell's 'Elegy to the Spanish Republic No. 110'.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete Again, a painting by an American painter who was active when a copyright notice and renewal was required. Per WP:NFCC#1, we should not accept a non-free painting by him. Additionally, this is an unambiguous violation of WP:NFCC#8 in all articles except the one about the painter. Additionally, the FURs are invalid as they are not relevant to each use. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:48, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:'Magenta, Black, Green on Orange', oil on canvas painting by Mark Rothko, 1947, Museum of Modern Art.jpg

File:'Magenta, Black, Green on Orange', oil on canvas painting by Mark Rothko, 1947, Museum of Modern Art.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wmpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Jasper Johns's 'Flag', Encaustic, oil and collage on fabric mounted on plywood,1954-55.jpg

File:Jasper Johns's 'Flag', Encaustic, oil and collage on fabric mounted on plywood,1954-55.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Marilyndiptych.jpg

File:Marilyndiptych.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cmyk (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:04, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Roy Lichtenstein Whaam.jpg

File:Roy Lichtenstein Whaam.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Plrk (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:04, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 12:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Keep for use in Whaam!, but should be removed from other, more general, articles. Plrk (talk) 12:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Guitarlesson.jpg

File:Guitarlesson.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mablerose (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Head VI (1949).JPG

File:Head VI (1949).JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stamboultrain (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Milton Avery - 'Green Sea', oil on canvas 1958, University of Kentucky Art Museum (Lexington, Kentucky).jpg

File:Milton Avery - 'Green Sea', oil on canvas 1958, University of Kentucky Art Museum (Lexington, Kentucky).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wmpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Jasper Johns's 'Map', 1961.jpg

File:Jasper Johns's 'Map', 1961.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. Remove from all articles except the article about the work. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Robert Rauschenberg's untitled 'combine', 1963.jpg

File:Robert Rauschenberg's untitled 'combine', 1963.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:07, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 12:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Cityscape I 360.jpg

File:Cityscape I 360.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Knulclunk (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  1. Non-free use does seem OK in the Diebenkorn article at first glance. Generally, a non-free image such as this would be allowed to show an example of the artist's work or style. The problem here though is that there is really no discussion of the painting anywhere at all in the article (its only mentioned by name in the caption) so the contextual connection between image and content required by WP:NFCC#8 is unclear. Moreover, the is another non-free example of Diebenkorn's work being used given the article, and File:Richard Diebenkorn's painting 'Ocean Park No. 67'.jpg is much more tied into the article content than Cityscape I 360, so it's not clear why two examples of Diebenkorn's work is needed per WP:NFCC#3a. Perhaps more sourced critical commentary of Cityscape I 360 itself or how it is representative of the Diebenkorn's particular style could be added to the article to strengthen its justification for non-free use; otherwise, I think removing the file from the article is appropriate.
  2. The non-free use in "Bay Area Figurative Movement", like the non-free use in the Diebenkorn article, seems like in should be OK. It could be reasoned that the painting is considered to be the most or one of most representative examples of the works created by artists discussed in the article. However, this also has the same issues as mentioned above: the painting is mentioned by name only one time in the image's caption; there's no critical commentary about the painting or how is best serves as an example of the movement's style; and there is another non-free image File:'Still Life with Cup', oil on canvas painting by Paul Wonner, 1959, private collection.jpg apparently being used to serve the same encyclopedic purpose. It's not clear why two examples of this movement's style is needed, and how removing one of the two would be detrimental to the reader's understanding per NFCC#8. As with the Diebenkorn article, the justification for non-free use would be much stronger and clearer if there was actually some sourced content about the painting and why it's seen as representative of this particular movement in the article to provide the context for non-free use; simply mentioning the painter by name and assuming that in and of itself is a justification for this type of non-free use is not really something allowed per WP:FREER.
  3. The three other articles where the file is being used are articles about a particular genre/style or historical aspects of painting in general. Justifying non-free use in these articles is going to be really hard in the first place per item 6 of WP:NFC#UUI, NFCC#1 and NFCC#8. The way the file is being used in these article seems to be just as one in a gallery of other images, which is not really allowed for non-free content per WP:NFG, with maybe a single mention by name. These articles do contain freely-licensed or PD images as well, so it's not clear why this particular file also needs to be used as such. Suggest removing the file from all of these articles based upon current usage.
It seems to me that given the current use of the file, keep for "Bay Area Figurative Movement" seems the best place to use this file if more critical commentary about the painting and how it represents the movement's style can be added to the article. I could also see keep for the painter's article, except there is another file also being used as an example of his work which is much better tied into the article content; two examples don't really seem to be needed and removing that Ocean Park file from the article seems more detrimental to the reader's understanding than removing this one. Finally, I'm really not seeing any justification for non-free use in the other articles; there are links to both the article about the movement and the artist in each of these articles, and the file can be seen there if needed. The use in an image gallery without a real sourced critical commentary about the painting in any of these articles doesn't seem to be permitted by NFCC#1, NFCC#8 or NFG; so, I suggest remove from these articles. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Richard Estes.jpg

File:Richard Estes.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zachiroth (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Fairfield Porter's painting 'Under the Elms', 1971 - 1972.jpg

File:Fairfield Porter's painting 'Under the Elms', 1971 - 1972.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Ralph Goings.jpg

File:Ralph Goings.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zachiroth (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:10, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Frankenthaler Helen Mountains and Sea 1952.jpg

File:Frankenthaler Helen Mountains and Sea 1952.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by File Upload Bot (Cobalty)~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:10, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:'Where', 252 x 362 cm. magna on canvas painting by Morris Louis, Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, 1960.jpg

File:'Where', 252 x 362 cm. magna on canvas painting by Morris Louis, Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, 1960.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wmpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:10, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:'Bridge' by Kenneth Noland, 1964..jpg

File:'Bridge' by Kenneth Noland, 1964..jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wmpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:11, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Josef Albers's painting 'Homage to the Square', 1965.jpg

File:Josef Albers's painting 'Homage to the Square', 1965.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:11, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Riley, Cataract 3.jpg

File:Riley, Cataract 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cactus.man (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:11, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:BlackGreyBeat.jpg

File:BlackGreyBeat.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chreliot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:15, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Frank Stella's 'Harran II', 1967.jpg

File:Frank Stella's 'Harran II', 1967.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Robert Mangold's acrylic and pencil 'X Within X Orange', 1981.jpg

File:Robert Mangold's acrylic and pencil 'X Within X Orange', 1981.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:'Red Canvas' by Richard Tuttle, 1967, Corcoran Gallery of Art.jpg

File:'Red Canvas' by Richard Tuttle, 1967, Corcoran Gallery of Art.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wmpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Gustonphilip.jpg

File:Gustonphilip.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mguidetti (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Typewriter-eraser.JPG

File:Typewriter-eraser.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Slowking4 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:18, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Richard Diebenkorn's painting 'Ocean Park No.129'.jpg

File:Richard Diebenkorn's painting 'Ocean Park No.129'.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Three Flags.jpg

File:Three Flags.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Raul654 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. Remove from all articles except the article about the work. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:22, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 12:57, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Hot Still-Scape for Six Colors - 7th Avenue Style.jpg

File:Hot Still-Scape for Six Colors - 7th Avenue Style.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jmm6f488 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:24, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images below...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:For Pearl.jpg

File:For Pearl.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hadams6 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Excessive non-free use, including galleries. Not all uses satisfy the contextual significance criterion. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:27, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep and all those visual art images above...Modernist (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Ferari Fauj.jpg

File:Ferari Fauj.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Arfeero (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is a screenshot from a movie. The non-free usage rationale states that the purpose is "[t]o illustrate Ferari Fauj". It is not the subject of significant commentary and its useage is decorative failing WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 00:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Requiem for a Dream rapid cuts.ogv

File:Requiem for a Dream rapid cuts.ogv (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Koavf (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This file was tagged for reduction by user:Stefan2 and User:Diannaa. I reduced the length of the file to the normal 30 second clip. The uploader believes (User_talk:Ronhjones#Length_of_video) that video clip can be of any length. We need to decide what the length should be. Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:53, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

I do not believe that it can be of "any" length. I think that the standards of a video from a two-hour film are different than a four-minute song and the clip I've uploaded is less than 1% of the length of the film and has reduced quality as well, so it easily fits the NFCC. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 05:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • WP:NFCC#3b does not list any specific length, but states that An entire work is not used if a portion will suffice. In this case, the discussed visual effects could be illustrated by only showing 10-20 seconds, and you would still understand how the visual effects were made. In other words, the file can be reduced significantly. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • A clip of a four minute song is actually limited to 24 seconds max. A clip of a one hour radio program is limited to 30 seconds max, so the comparison between audio and video do hold out. The 30 second clip I made, does show the visual effects clearly enough. Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:26, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Guru (2017 film) Audio.jpg

File:Guru (2017 film) Audio.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by B.Bhargava Teja (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Soundtrack covers should not be used in film articles as they violate WP:NFCC. Moreover this image also violates WP:WATERMARK. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Little Mix (Live on the Glory Days Tour).png

File:Little Mix (Live on the Glory Days Tour).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nevermissu (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There are other photos of them on Commons, most recently from 2016. Wikipedia routinely uses images which were not taken in the last 12 months, so the fair use rationale does not apply. Jc86035 (talk) 10:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Fifth Harmony (songwriting).jpg

File:Fifth Harmony (songwriting).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nevermissu (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not necessary, so fails NFCC #1; there are copyleft images of Fifth Harmony and and copyleft images of recording studios. Jc86035 (talk) 12:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Saudi Amb to US with Saudi Fighter Pilots.png

File:Saudi Amb to US with Saudi Fighter Pilots.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Olivia eliz (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free image fails WP:NFCC#8. There is no significant sourced commentary about the image nor does the lack of an image detract from the readers understanding of the claimed purpose in the non-free usage rationale of "Showcase the Saudi Amb. to the U.S.'s involvement in Saudi military" Whpq (talk) 13:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Saudi Crown Prince and Ambassador to US with Tim Cook at Apple.png

File:Saudi Crown Prince and Ambassador to US with Tim Cook at Apple.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Olivia eliz (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free image fails WP:NFCC#8. There is no significant sourced commentary about the image nor does the lack of an image detract from the readers understanding of the claimed purpose in the non-free usage rationale of "Show link between Saudi Ambassador to U.S. and Saudi Crown Prince, as well as involvement in technology in U.S." Whpq (talk) 13:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Saudi Amb to US at Silicon Valley meeting.png

File:Saudi Amb to US at Silicon Valley meeting.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Olivia eliz (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free image fails WP:NFCC#8. There is no significant sourced commentary about the image nor does the lack of an image detract from the readers understanding of the claimed purpose in the non-free usage rationale of "Illustrate Saudi Amb. to US's involvement in Crown Prince's tour around U.S. in 2018" Whpq (talk) 13:10, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Saudi Amb to US in Boeing fighter jet.png

File:Saudi Amb to US in Boeing fighter jet.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Olivia eliz (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free image fails WP:NFCC#8. There is no significant sourced commentary about the image nor does the lack of an image detract from the readers understanding of the claimed purpose in the non-free usage rationale of "Highlights KSA Amb to U.S.'s diplomatic career, including in military/technology" Whpq (talk) 13:10, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Ruth Porat 2016.jpg

File:Ruth Porat 2016.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ThaiTee (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The public domain mark is not an acceptable release and is only to be used on photos that are in the public domain for other reasons. It is not the same as {{CC0}}. We don't know why this photo is under the public domain and previous instances of this resulted in deletion. For more information on why we don't consider this acceptable please see the Commons template Majora (talk) 17:28, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Comment - It's frustrating because that they are "public domain" is also repeated on the GES website. There are also many pictures from the Department of State that would be more obviously in the public domain as government-created, but I cannot find evidence that this picture is among them. There is an alternative here, which is more clearly marked as the product of the State Dept. photographer, but I cannot find a version that isn't a very small resolution (it would be a better picture than the present one if we could). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:32, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Wendelinuskapelle Reimsbach.jpg

File:Wendelinuskapelle Reimsbach.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Narwaro (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Referral as this is claimed as an 'attribution', but I've not found a clear statement to that effect on the page given as the source. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:49, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Also the Google translation of - https://www.pg-beckingen.de/about seems to say non-commerical use only... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete I think that https://www.pg-beckingen.de/about/ (section "Urheberrecht") says that any use, other than private non-commercial downloading and copying, requires written permission from the rights holders. In other words, this is an unfree file. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:07, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
I will explicitly request a written permission to remove any doubts. I will remove the image from the page it is used in for the time being. Cheers, Narwaro (talk) 21:15, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
User:Narwaro, see {{di-no permission-notice}} for instructions on how to do this. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

June 19

File:RCA Bluebird 78 B-11230-B Glenn Miller.jpg

File:RCA Bluebird 78 B-11230-B Glenn Miller.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Carl savich (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

File was prodded for deletion here and deprodded here, so I'm bringing it here for further discussion. Basically, this is decorative use of a record label in Sun Valley Serenade. Despite the non-free rationale's use claim to the contrary, there is no sourced critical commentary of this record label anywhere within the article so the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFC#cite_note-3 is lacking. The claim that the song is famous and won a gold record are not in dispute, but they also don't require that a non-free image be seen by the reader and is information which can be more than sufficiently expressed through text and citations to reliable sources. This is quite similar to trying to use a non-free album cover of a movie soundtrack album in an article about the movie, which is something not allowed by Wikipedia's non-free content use policy or WP:FILMSCORE. Moreover, there is already a similar image File:Chattanooga3.jpg being used in Chattanooga Choo Choo so there's no need for two non-free images of essentially the same thing per WP:NFCC#3a, so moving this file to the article about the song would not be appropriate.

The only way I can see this being kept is if its too simple for copyright protection, or its copyright has lapsed and was not renewed. The label is mostly text except for the RCA dog imagery of Nipper. I don't think that's simple enough to be considered below c:COM:TOO#United States, but it might be old enough for its copyright to have lapsed per {{PD-US-not renewed}}. If this file doesn't need to be non-free than the one used in the article about the song also probably doesn't need to be non-free. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:30, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

  • I think it would be safe to re-tag it as {{pd-us}}. The Nipper logo was published as early as 1903. See this example. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:34, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
    • Converting the files to PD seems fine unless someone else disagrees. They would no longer be subject to WP:NFCCP and could be moved to Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Stjohn-grand-priors-badge.png

File:Stjohn-grand-priors-badge.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vanished user sflgjhaerp98q3iv8j3qp8uti (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is not necessarily own work in the design, which is most likely held by the issuing organisation. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Arthur Kampf - Knabe in Rot (1907).JPG

File:Arthur Kampf - Knabe in Rot (1907).JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Illustratedjc (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

FFD referral, as it's apparently un-sourced. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:44, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Wiki-kobi.jpg

File:Wiki-kobi.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Achasearchitect (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Available on Commons at higher resolution, though with a different (and probably equally spurious) claim of authorship/ownership. However, I plan to nominate that for deletion also, as there's no evidence of permission from the photographer, nor indication of who that was. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Firesign Theatre Farm Hippies no. 3.jpg

File:Firesign Theatre Farm Hippies no. 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JustinTime55 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#9. Stefan2 (talk) 16:50, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Keep:
  • Does not fail NFCC#9: it only appears in mainspace article. What else is wrong with its location?
  • NFCC#8 is subjective; this photo significantly increases readers' understanding of the article topic by providing visual identification of two of the Firesigns' wives who performed with them; its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. JustinTime55 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
There is no need to include pictures of the wives as this isn't an article about the wives. There is no sourced critical commentary about what the wives looked like. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:13, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:CashConvertersLogo.png

File:CashConvertersLogo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Godnose (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No source. The uploader didn't specify how to verify that this is the logo of the company. The company's website has a different logo. Stefan2 (talk) 16:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Ulsan Flag.png

File:Ulsan Flag.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ASDFGH (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is claimed to be unfree, but I'm not sure if it meets the threshold of originality. If copyrighted, then it should be removed from User:Leventio/sandbox per WP:NFCC#9. Stefan2 (talk) 16:56, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:AltaicLanguagesAccurate.png

File:AltaicLanguagesAccurate.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mirza Farahani (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

A POV map. Whereas this user, who seems to be a POV pusher, wanted to cancel the bias by removing color from areas populated by Kurds they did a really poor job by completely ignoring many Turkic populated areas, for example in Crimea and elsewhere in Europe. Ymblanter (talk) 17:03, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Gandalara-Map.jpg

File:Gandalara-Map.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FrankWilliams (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Generic but copyrighted fantasy map. WP:NFCC failure. Not necessary to understand the article. Sandstein 21:28, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

June 20

File:Australia Post Keypas.jpg

File:Australia Post Keypas.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Supcmd (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Is it really necessary for this to be under fair use? Even if the information is blacked out a free use version could be created that would serve the same purpose. All someone would have to do is take a photo of theirs. Majora (talk) 01:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Max Beckmann - 'Carnival', Oil on canvas, 1943.jpg

File:Max Beckmann - 'Carnival', Oil on canvas, 1943.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wpearl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete: Used in three articles, and none of them discuss the work, so omission would not be detrimental to the reader's understanding of the article subjects (WP:NFCC#8). None of the rationales are specific to each use but are the same thing repeated with the article changed (WP:NFCC#10c). — JJMC89(T·C) 04:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:SCruzFlagcolor.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

File:SCruzFlagcolor.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DASHBot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

NFCC applied to free image: California municipal government work. Xeror (talk) 08:08, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SmarTone logo.svg

File:SmarTone logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wefk423 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

A PD logo, but it was uploaded as an unfree SVG file. I assume that this means that the uploader or whoever made the vectorisation refused to license the vectorisation. Since the underlying logo is PD, the file fails WP:NFCC#1 as it can be replaced by a freely licensed vectorisation (or by a bitmap version). Stefan2 (talk) 12:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

@Stefan2: My apologies, this should be a PD logo extracted from SmarTone's official website. Should I just replace the license of the file with {{pd-logo}}? –Wefk423 (talk) 13:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
  • Convert to free and send to Commons as {{pd-textlogo}} — JJMC89(T·C) 01:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

File:1967.NRP.flyer.has.your.mother.been.raped.yet.png

File:1967.NRP.flyer.has.your.mother.been.raped.yet.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The fact that material is in an FBI file doesn't in this instance transfer the copyright to the US Fedral Government does it.

(I'd also appreciate there being a fuller justification as to why material like this is required in an academic context. ) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:1951.12.27.eustace.mullins.letter.to.womens.voice.png

File:1951.12.27.eustace.mullins.letter.to.womens.voice.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Press clipping, the fact that it's in an FBI file, wouldn't necessarily transfer the copyright to the Federal Government.

(I am also concerned, that whilst English Wikipedia is not censored, the file description page contains little of nor infomaiton as to why content of this kind is justified in an academic context.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:07, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:1963.01.11.NRP.america.first.rally.advert.png

File:1963.01.11.NRP.america.first.rally.advert.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The fact that third-party content is in an FBI fie, does not necessarily imply the copyright transferred to the Federal Govt.

Also noting that whilst English Wikipedia is not censored, the file description page has no information explaining or explaining or justifying why inclusion of content like this is acceptable in an academic context. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:11, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Skyarts.JPG

File:Skyarts.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AlexJ (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

See WP:NFC#cite_note-4. Stefan2 (talk) 16:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:The Now Now singles cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

File:The Now Now singles cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Philroc (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This seems to be a cover of The Now Now rather than a cover for Humility (song). As such, it should only be used in The Now Now but not in Humility (song). Stefan2 (talk) 16:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Support per nom, the single cover is a duplicate of the album cover. Lazz_R 19:33, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stothert Fullers Earth.jpg

File:Stothert Fullers Earth.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Swellian (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The {{imagewatermark}} suggests that this wasn't created by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Dubious claim of own work. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Wipr-prtv.jpeg

File:Wipr-prtv.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MelvinPena (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

See WP:NFC#cite_note-4. Stefan2 (talk) 17:07, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:WashingtonEagles.gif

File:WashingtonEagles.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DMC511 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

See WP:NFC#cite_note-4. Stefan2 (talk) 20:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Evolution of PCP - Design and Initial Drawings.pdf

File:Evolution of PCP - Design and Initial Drawings.pdf (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by EuFMDFAO (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Three logos

File:Fixed income analysts society pic.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Woertchen (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Fiasi logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Woertchen (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:Fixed Income Analysts Society Logo master RGB.pdf (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Woertchen (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused (except on each others' file information pages), no foreseeable use. Draft:Fixed Income Analysts Society was deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

File:IntersectionOfCTSectionWithNLocalizer.pdf

File:IntersectionOfCTSectionWithNLocalizer.pdf (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kirigiri (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 22:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

June 21

File:Conilithes en.pdf

File:Conilithes en.pdf (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Alessandro Zanzi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, no foreseeable use. The pictures seem to be from random sources and may have copyright problems. For example, some look like scans from publications. Stefan2 (talk) 10:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Moon Studios logo.png

File:Moon Studios logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by IagoQnsi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

PD-textlogo, now on Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Moon_Studios_logo.png Yann (talk) 10:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Joe Chandler III.jpg

File:Joe Chandler III.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rossbawse (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This individual has now been identified (see the article) but I'm not experienced in how we should proceed pertaining to this file, as it is non-free. Home Lander (talk) 22:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

June 22

Footer

Today is June 22 2018. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 June 22 -- (new nomination)

If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:Ffd log}} to the top of the day's page.

Please ensure "===June 22===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Files for discussion page (the one you're on now) work.

The page Wikipedia:Files for discussion/Today will always show today's log.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion&oldid=846961457"
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Wikipedia:Files for discussion"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA