Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removing Featured lists in Wikipedia

This page is for the review and improvement of Wikipedia:Featured lists that may no longer meet the Featured list criteria. FLs should be kept at current standards regardless of when it was promoted. Any objections raised in the review must be actionable.

The FLC director, Giants2008, or his delegates, PresN and The Rambling Man, determine the exact timing of the process for each nomination. Nominations will last at least 14 days, and longer where changes are ongoing and it seems useful to continue the process. For a nomination to be kept, consensus must be reached that it still meets the criteria. Consensus is built among reviewers and nominators; the delegates determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list, archived and added to Former featured lists if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews:

  • actionable objections have not been resolved; or
  • consensus to keep has not been reached; or
  • insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met

Nominations may be closed earlier than the allotted two weeks if, in the judgment of the FLRC delegate, the list in the nomination:

  • has a clear consensus to merge or redirect to another article or list. This consensus may be shown in Articles for deletion, a discussion on the article's talk page, a discussion on the relevant WikiProject(s), or other community venues that present a tangible consensus to merge or redirect the article; or
  • contains a clear copyright violation and removal of the copyrighted material would severely degrade the quality of the list.

Do not nominate lists that have recently been promoted (such complaints should have been brought up during the candidacy period on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates), or lists that have recently survived a removal attempt – such nominations are likely to be removed summarily.

A bot will update the list talk page after the list has been kept or the nomination archived; the delay in bot processing can range from minutes to several days, and the {{FLRC}} template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates {{ArticleHistory}}. If a nomination is delisted, editors should take adequate time to work on resolving issues before re-nominating at Featured list candidates.

Purge the cache to refresh this page – Table of Contents – Closing instructions

Featured content:

Featured list tools:


Nomination procedure

  • Place {{subst:FLRC}} on the talk page of the nominated list.
  • From the FLRC template, click on the red "initiate the nomination" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text. If you are unsure how to complete a nomination, please post to the FLRC talk page for assistance.
  • Below the preloaded title, write your reason for nominating the list, sign with ~~~~ and save the page. Please note which of the featured list criteria that the list fails to meet.
  • Place {{Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/name of nominated article/archiveNumber}} at the top of the list of nominees on this page by first copying the above, clicking "edit" on the top of the page, and then pasting, making sure to add the name of the nominated article.
  • Notify relevant parties by adding {{subst:FLRCMessage|ArticleName|archive=# of archive page}} (for example, {{subst:FLRCMessage|List of Presidents of the United States|archive=1}}) to relevant talk pages (insert article name). Relevant parties include main contributors to the article (identifiable through article stats script), the editor who originally nominated the article for Featured List status (identifiable through the Featured List Candidate link in the Article Milestones), and any relevant WikiProjects (identifiable through the talk page banners, but there may be other Projects that should be notified). Leave a message at the top of the FLRC indicating whom you have notified and that notifications have been completed.
Nominations urgently needing reviews
edit · history · watch · refresh

The following lists were nominated for removal more than 14 days ago and have had their review time extended because objections are still being addressed, the nomination has not received enough reviews, or insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met. If you have not yet reviewed them, please take the time to do so:

Lists nominated for removal

List of tallest buildings in Singapore

Notified: SGpedians' notice board

There are certain issues raised for this featured list. Such as the list is no longer being updated, contain an excessive number of citations and have some irrelevant citations. The list is also messed up such as some of them is not centred, and there are also a citation needed tag. This list differs a lot than when this was nominated as FL. TanKimSeng (talk) 09:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

I do not agree with all the criticisms. The number of citations does not seem excessive as there are only 128 in total and no more than two for any building. One picture not centred and one citation needed are minor and easily fixable. The list is being updated with new buildings, but it is not clear how consistently, and there are references to buildings due to be completed in 2012 and 2013. There is also a statement of the building which is "currently" tallest without a date. The article is below FL but it should not be too difficult to fix the problems if anyone wants to take it on, so I would think it is too early to delist. Dudley Miles (talk) 21:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

I do agree this page needs a lot of work. Tallest under construction section has a broken table, and is completely out of date (all buildings were supposed to be complete 4 years ago). I suppose we can just get rid of this section all together. Table is missing 2 coordinates, 1 needs formatting, 1 image needs formatting, ranking is broken for sorting purposes (it goes 1, then 10, then 11), statements like " 123rd-tallest in the world" have long been inaccurate, some notes have centered justification, others right. Sentences like "This lists ranks Singapore skyscrapers" is no longer good style for featured lists, and is used several times. "The "Year" column indicates the year in which a building was completed." should be deleted, and the column called "year completed"... The first link I clicked was a dead link not sure about others. I vote for delist, but the page is salvageable if someone has the time and effort to do so. Mattximus (talk) 01:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from ""
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia :
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA