Template talk:WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Implementing "nested" option

{{editprotected}} (btw, why is this template protected?)

Please replace the very first line:

{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk"

with the nesting code:

{| class="{{#ifeq:{{lc:{{{nested|}}}}}|yes|collapsible collapsed messagebox nested-talk|{{#ifeq:{{lc:{{{small|}}}}}|yes|messagebox small-talk|messagebox standard-talk}}}}"
|-
{{#ifeq:{{lc:{{{nested|}}}}}|yes|
! colspan="2" style="text-align: center" {{!}} [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Bridges|WikiProject Bridges]]{{#if:{{{class|}}} |      (Rated {{ucfirst:{{{class}}}}}-Class)|}}
}}

Please note the ampersands and copy from this regular page, not the code. Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 17:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. Also, the template is protected because there are over 600 transclusions of it. Cheers. --MZMcBride 19:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

New version of template

{{editprotected}} Could the Template:WikiProject Bridges article/sandbox version be copied over to Template:WikiProject Bridges article. Thanks. -- WOSlinker (talk) 19:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

 Done and also moved to a better name. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:46, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Template links to a dab page

{{editprotected}} Please unlink Bridges - it's a dab page. Thanks. 92.4.41.73 (talk) 20:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

I've changed it to link to bridge. Hope that's okay with you. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. 92.4.41.73 (talk) 22:39, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Future -Class needed

Detroit River International Crossing is a prime example of an article that should be assessed as Future-Class: a proposed bridge that hasn't been built yet. Too many details over the near-term will be in flux until the bridge is actually approved, designed and built. Anyway, that's why I assessed that article this way, but the banner doesn't support that classification. Imzadi 1979  18:38, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

In the absence of a |QUALITY_SCALE= parameter you get the default "standard" scale (see Template:WPBannerMeta#Assessment). To allow Future-class, you need to create the appropriate subpage Template:WikiProject Bridges/class. If the only extra class that is needed is Future, something like this should do it:
{{class mask<noinclude>/templatepage</noinclude>|{{{class|}}}
 |topic=Bridge
 |future=yes
}}
You then need to set |QUALITY_SCALE=subpage inside the {{WPBannerMeta}} of Template:WikiProject Bridges. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:13, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Ok, the subpage is set, so we just need the parameter added to the main template. Imzadi 1979  20:30, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Please add

|QUALITY_SCALE=subpage

to the template coding to enable Future-Class. Imzadi 1979  20:30, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Done Sorry it took so long! I skipped about 45 mins worth of watchlist by mistake. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:06, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
No worries and thanks. Imzadi 1979  14:39, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Portal link

Please add a standard link to the portal, by adding the following lines

|PORTAL = Bridges 
|PORTAL_IMG = IP tourismus.png

Thanks --ELEKHHT 06:10, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

DoneMr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 09:59, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 12 October 2014

That picture of the stone bridge could be changed to File:P bridge.svg, as I think those kind of icons make the banners look much nicer, plus the width of the photograph is a little much and pushes the gradings wider.

Also, why is this template fully protected? Rcsprinter123 (discourse) @ 22:02, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

This template is not fully protected, it is template-editor protected, it is used on >5000 pages. Please engage the project talk Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bridges for a short period to propose the logo change for this project, after consensus (or at least no-objection) reactivate the edit request here. — xaosflux Talk 22:19, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 21 January 2018 Update info please!

Message from ZACHO per WikiProject Bridges Template -- @Admin:, In accordance with the recent changes to the title,

the parameter

 banner=bridge(s) 

should be replaced with banner= bridge(s) and tunnel(s) and an additional image of a tunnel should be provided. I would do it myself, though there is a extended confirmed protection , and I'm only Auto-confirmed. I may bring this up @ protection requests (via Twinkle). Thank you. Sincerely, User: Zanygenius(talk page) 20:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Not done |banner= does not exist. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
@JJMC89: Oops, I meant |BANNER_NAME= in this Wikipedian banner page.
Sincerely, User: Zanygenius(talk page) 22:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
@Zanygenius: No, you mean |MAIN_ARTICLE=, see this edit. The |BANNER_NAME= parameter must match the actual name of the template.
Anyway, I have moved the templates and made some edits consequent on that; I have done nothing about the category names as yet. Nor have I altered the image, since (i) you didn't suggest one; and (ii) there can be only one image.
What you can do - whilst I am out at work - is to check it through, and make any amendments that you think might be necessary, at Template:WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels/sandbox. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
I've updated the categories. If a new image is wanted, please specify one. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:07, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
@JJMC89: Why have you blanked out the |substcheck= parameter? It's one of the standard parameters, and the documentation for Template:WPBannerMeta shows it as always being filled in. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:33, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
It serves to show {{WPBannerMeta/substwarning}} when the template is subst. That cannot happen when Module:Unsubst is used. — JJMC89(T·C) 15:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
So where in Template:WPBannerMeta is it advised to use Module:Unsubst? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:07, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Nowhere, but what does that have to do with anything? It is more user friendly — a user attempting to subst ends up with the correct result if the module is used instead of having to fix it when {{substcheck}} is used. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:40, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:WikiProject_Bridges_and_Tunnels&oldid=822219491"
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:WikiProject_Bridges_and_Tunnels
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Template talk:WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA