Talk:Dummy variable (statistics)
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Symbiosis School of Economics supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page. 
WikiProject Statistics  (Rated Cclass, Highimportance)  


WikiProject Mathematics  (Rated Cclass, Lowimportance)  


Unfortunate term
The term "dummy variable" is unfortunate. That term is very appropriate when used to refer to bound variables. Its use in any other way detracts from that. Michael Hardy (talk) 05:45, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 That doesn't reflect common usage. "Bound variable" is the more common term for the latter concept, at least in computer science. DavidSarah Hopwood (talk) 14:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

 "Bound variable" is NOT the more common term for the latter concept in mathematics at all. In the expression
 any mathematician will understand what you're talking about it you say n is a "dummy" or a "dummy variable", but if you refer to a "bound variable" they'll understand you only if they're familiar with conventions used by those doing research in mathematical logic. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 "Bound variable" is NOT the more common term for the latter concept in mathematics at all. In the expression
 Dummy variable is the terminology used in statistic and econometric courses. Since the title of the article refers to statistice, computer science has no relevency in this areaP0PP4B34R732 (talk) 19:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Dr. Pagan's comment on this article
Dr. Pagan has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
I think this is well done. Clear and the examples good. I think there are some issues in using these in time series as dependent variables. Models such as logit and probit assume that they independent over time but decisions re retirement are not like that, as is affiliation with a political party. These are likely to have inertia as so a lack of independence.
The main problem I think is that there is a bit of repetition e.g. the dummy variable trap is explained twice in succeeding paragraphs. I also think it better to say “Assume” rather than “Say”. However, this is a personal preference. The statement “To find if the mean salaries of the teachers in the North and South are statistically different from that of teachers in the West” seems to suggest a joint test rather than the single hypotheses tested in the text. The references seem to have a lot missing. Mention is made of pdf’s but where does one get them? I clicked on them but nothing happened. Ditto with lecture notes.
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Pagan has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
 Reference : Adrian pagan & Don Harding, 2006. "The Econometric Analysis of Constructed Binary Time Series. Working paper #1," NCER Working Paper Series 1, National Centre for Econometric Research.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 14:35, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 India Education Program student projects, 2011 Q3
 India Education Program student projects
 CClass Statistics articles
 Highimportance Statistics articles
 WikiProject Statistics articles
 Mathematics articles related to probability and statistics
 CClass mathematics articles
 LowPriority mathematics articles