Talk:Double counting (fallacy)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject Philosophy (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Statistics (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page or join the discussion.

Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
 

Deletion proposal

I have contested a PROD made on the grounds of No reliable secondary sources found on Google. This seems completely wrong. Google Books search for '"Double counting" fallacy' yielded nearly a thousand hits, many obviously relevant. Deltahedron (talk) 06:23, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Double_counting_(fallacy)&oldid=551094353"
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Double_counting_(fallacy)
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Talk:Double counting (fallacy)"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA