Talk:Divergence theorem
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:  

Daily article pageviews  

Archives 


Contents
Untitled
This article is based on the GFDL article from PlanetMath at http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/Divergence.html
That's my contribution for the day done. The Anome
Re: removal of the condition that the region S be compact  I doubt that one can do this unconditionally.
Charles Matthews 18:53, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 You are correct. Either the manifold must be compact, or the integrand must have compact support. sorry for the sloppiness. i think i will just change it back.
Re: Infinite plane of mass
The behavior is an approximative case only. It is the closest to "ideal" when you are very close to the black hole's event horizon. At least that is what I remember from a website which I'll need to look up. :)
24.84.203.193 28 June 2005 14:17 (UTC)
"Correctly called Ostrogradsky's theorem"?
Claiming it is corrected called something based on who gave the first rigorous proof is interjecting the author's opinion in how theorem's should be named. Fermat didn't prove Fermat's Last Theorem, Stokes didn't prove what we now call Stokes' Theorem in geometry, etc. If someone wants to include it being called something else that's fine, but saying one way is correct is an opinion which doesn't belong here. RyanEberhart (talk) 19:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Flawed Example
Here is the text from the article: "Let's say I have a rigid container filled with some gas. If the gas starts to expand but the container does not expand, what has to happen? Since we assume that the container does not expand (it is rigid) but that the gas is expanding, then gas has to somehow leak out of the container. (Or I suppose the container could burst, but that counts as both gas leaking out of the container and the container expanding.)"
This is not true. If the gas expands, due to, perhaps, an increase in temperature, then the pressure in the container will rise, without the volume of the container necessarily changing. This is why things explode in the first place—the pressure builds up due to gas expansion (temperature increase) but gas cannot escape, leading to a pressure buildup and eventual explosion. I don't know enough math to suggest a better example, but this one is severely flawed.
24.60.252.143 (talk) 15:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Divergence theorem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402154904/http://wwwpersonal.umich.edu/~madeland/math255/files/StokesKatz.pdf to http://wwwpersonal.umich.edu/~madeland/math255/files/StokesKatz.pdf
 Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20021029094728/http://planetmath.org:80/encyclopedia/Divergence.html to http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/Divergence.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}}
(last update: 15 July 2018).
 If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
 If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Generalization
5.95.187.184 (talk)I would like to recall your attention about this section, in particular about the first subsection: Multiple dimensions. In fact, I think that this one would actually benefit in being inserted as a subsubsection of the generalization to the Riemaniann Manifold, for which the equation is: , where is for the riemaniann volume form of the riemannian Manifolds, namely, and (the last one considered as a submanifold of with the inclusion as embedding), is a vector field, and is the versor normal field defined on . Considered this equation, the subsection Multiple dimensions is just a corollary, with considered as a submanifold of