Talk:Discrete logarithm records

WikiProject Cryptography / Computer science  (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

CPU-hours?

CPU-hours isn't a proper unit for measurement. Please either specify WHAT a CPU-hour is or use another unit which is directly compareable. --82.113.122.166 (talk) 07:56, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

ECC

No, it must be a joke! With less than 160 or even 164 bits Diffie–Hellman key exchange is not really secure against NSA as a matter of fact.

See for example Pollard's_rho_algorithm_for_logarithms.

But ok, it seems 113 is really the record today. Perfect, with the Mersenne Prime ${\displaystyle p=2^{607}-1}$ it is perfectly secure. 109.90.224.162 (talk) 09:25, 30 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.90.224.162 (talk) 09:44, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Discrete logarithm records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151022135946/https://www.certicom.com/images/pdfs/challenge-2009.pdf to http://www.certicom.com/images/pdfs/challenge-2009.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required on behalf of editors regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification, as with any edit, using the archive tools per instructions below. This message updated dynamically through the template `{{sourcecheck}}` (last update: 1 May 2018).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot 09:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)