From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Netherlands (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.


I have begun to expand this article as part of a general project of linking all the articles referring to pottery decorated in tin-glaze. Marshall46 13:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

No mention of Ming Dynasty?

Shouldn't this be in there? 06:46, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Why Ming Dynasty particularly? This is sufficient: "Delftware inspired by Chinese originals persisted from about 1630 to the mid-eighteenth century alongside European patterns." Marshall46 (talk) 22:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


(1) Marl is a type of clay, for example Eturia marl. (2) Earthenware is a type of ceramic, \3) Occasionally found description of earthenware clay needs proper interpretation, it means a clay body that when correctly fired forms earthenware, (4) saying Marl is rich is calcium compounds is more accurate than lime, which is CaO. Although oxides are listed in XRF results they are not found discretely in Marl, or for that matter in other clays. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 12:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

The mention of marl in the article is verified. You give no source for your statements. Wikipedia is not the place for original research or an editor's point of view. Marshall46 (talk) 20:20, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
The edits by the editor were not original research or point of view - rather they improved the article by giving a more correct description. If correctly quoted from the cited book then its author has a limited understanding of the subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 21:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

See Also

The "See Also" section should lose the names of porcelain factories except where they were established on the sites of former tinglaze factories or were established by entrepreneurs previously engaged in faience making. So, Weesp and Porsgrund could go as Wikipedia's articles on them don't mention delftware. Modern undertakings which produce several classes of ceramics including tinglaze could also go unless they originally produced tinglaze. Articles on them could link to this page to explain term.truthordare (talk) 08:04, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Agreed... be bold make the changes. Theroadislong (talk) 09:27, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from ""
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia :
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Talk:Delftware"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA