Recording studio as an instrument

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
A Studer four-track tape recorder used at EMI Studios from 1965 to the 1970s

In music production or composition, recording studios are sometimes referred to as an instrument forming a vital part of the music creation process. The approach is typically embodied by artists or producers who place less emphasis on simply capturing live performances in studio and instead favor the creative use of studio technology in completing finished works. Techniques include the incorporation of non-musical sounds, overdubbing, tape edits, sound synthesis, audio signal processing, and combining segmented performances (takes) into a unified whole.[1]

Composers have been exploiting the potentials of multitrack recording since the technology was made available to them.[2] Before the late 1940s, musical recordings were typically created with the idea of presenting a faithful rendition of a real-life performance. Following the advent of three-track tape in the mid 1950s, recording spaces became more accustomed for in-studio composition, and by the early 1970s, the "additive approach to recording" had become a common standard.[3]

Despite the widespread changes that have led to more compact recording set-ups, individual components such as digital audio workstations are still referred to as "the studio".[4] As of the 2010s, the "studio as instrument" idea remains ubiquitous in genres such as hip-hop, electronic music, and pop.[5]

Definitions

There is no single instance in which the studio suddenly became recognized as an instrument, and even at present [2018] it may not have wide recognition as such. Nevertheless, there is a historical precedent of the studio—broadly defined—consciously being used to perform music.

—Adam Bell, Dawn of the DAW: The Studio As Musical Instrument[6]

"Playing the studio" is critical shorthand for in-studio composition.[7] There is no consensus as to how to define the criterion of a musical instrument.[8] It is also unclear whether the "studio as instrument" concept extends to using multi-track recording simply to facilitate the basic music writing process.[9] According to academic Adam Bell, some proposed definitions may be consistent with music produced in a recording studio, but not with music that relies heavily on digital audio workstations (DAW).[8]

Rock historian Doyle Greene defines "studio as compositional tool" as a process in which music is produced around studio constructions rather than the more traditional method of capturing a live performance as is.[1] Techniques include the incorporation of non-musical sounds, overdubbing, tape edits, sound synthesis, audio signal processing, and combining segmented performances (takes) into a unified whole.[1] Despite the widespread changes that have led to more compact recording set-ups, individual components such as DAWs are still referred to as "the studio".[4]

Evolution of recording processes

Phil Spector (center) at Gold Star Studios, where he developed his Wall of Sound methods, 1965

Before the late 1940s, musical recordings were typically created with the idea of presenting a faithful rendition of a real-life performance.[10] Writing in 1937, the American composer John Cage called for the development of "centers of experimental music" places where "the new materials, oscillators, turntables, generators, means for amplifying small sounds, film phonographs, etc." would allow composers to "work using twentieth-century means for making music." [11] In the early 1950s, electronic equipment was expensive to own, and for most people, was only accessible through large organizations or institutions. However, virtually every young composer was interested in the potential of tape-based recording.[12] According to Brian Eno, "the move to tape was very important", because unlike gramophone records, tape was "malleable and mutable and cuttable and reversible in ways that discs aren't. It's very hard to do anything interesting with a disc".[10]

Popular recording conventions changed profoundly in the mid 1950s as new possibilities were opened by three-track tape,[3] and by the early 1960s, it was common for producers, songwriters, and engineers to freely experiment with musical form, orchestration, unnatural reverb, and other sound effects. Some of the best known examples are Phil Spector's Wall of Sound and Joe Meek's use of homemade electronic sound effects for acts like the Tornados.[13] According to Bell, various music educators alluded to "using the studio as a musical instrument" in books published as early as the late 1960s.[14]

In-studio composition became standard practice by the late 1960s and early 1970s, and remained so into the 2010s. During the 1970s, the "studio as instrument" concept shifted from the studio's recording space to the studio's control room, where electronic instruments could be plugged directly into the mixing console.[15] As of the 2010s, the "studio as instrument" idea remains ubiquitous in genres such as pop, hip-hop, and electronic music.[5]

Notable artists and works

1940s–1950s

  • Pioneers from the 1940s include Bill Putnam, Les Paul, and Tom Dowd, who each contributed to the development of common recording practices like reverb, tape delay, and overdubbing. Putnam was one of the first to recognize echo and reverb as elements to enhance a recording, rather than as natural byproducts of the recording space. He engineered the Harmonicats' 1947 novelty song "Peg o' My Heart", which was a significant chart hit and became the first popular recording to use artificial reverb for artistic effect.[5] Although Les Paul was not the first to use overdubs, he popularized the technique in the 1950s.[16]

1950s–1960s

  • English producer Joe Meek is considered one of the most influential engineers of all time,[by whom?] being one of the first to exploit the use of recording studios as instruments, and one of the first producers to assert an individual identity as an artist.[17] He got his start in 1955 at IBC Studio in London. One of Meek's signature techniques was to overload a signal with dynamic range compression, which was unorthodox at the time. Several of his "radical" techniques (such as close-miking instruments) later became part of normal recording practice.[5][nb 1]
  • Discussing Jerry Leiber and Mike Stoller, Adam Bell describes the songwriting duo's productions for the Coasters as "an excellent example of their pioneering practices in the emerging field of production", citing an account from Stoller in which he recalls "cutting esses off words, sticking the tape back together so you didn't notice. And sometimes if the first refrain on a take was good and the second one lousy, we'd tape another recording of the first one and stick it in place of the second one."[18]
  • Phil Spector, sometimes regarded as Joe Meek's American counterpart,[19] is also considered "important as the first star producer of popular music and its first 'auteur' ... Spector changed pop music from a performing art ... to an art which could sometimes exist only in the recording studio".[20] His original production formula (dubbed the "Wall of Sound") called for large ensembles (including some instruments not generally used for ensemble playing, such as electric and acoustic guitars), with multiple instruments doubling and even tripling many of the parts to create a fuller, richer sound.[21][nb 2] It evolved from his mid-1950s work with Leiber and Stoller during the period in which they sought a fuller sound through excessive instrumentation.[23][nb 3] His 1963 production of "Be My Baby", according to Rolling Stone magazine, was a "Rosetta stone for studio pioneers such as the Beatles and Brian Wilson".[24]
Martin working with the Beatles, 1964
  • The Beatles' producer George Martin and the Beach Boys' producer-songwriter Brian Wilson are generally credited with helping to popularize the idea of the studio as an instrument used for in-studio composition, and music producers after the mid 1960s increasingly drew from their work.[25][nb 4] Although Martin was nominally the Beatles' producer, from 1964 he ceded control to the band, allowing them to use the studio as a workshop for their ideas and later as a sound laboratory.[27] Musicologist Olivier Julien writes that the Beatles' "gradual integration of arranging and recording into one and the same process" began as early as 1963, but developed in earnest during the sessions for Rubber Soul (1965) and Revolver (1966) and "ultimately blossomed" during the sessions for Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (1967).[28] Wilson, who was mentored by Spector,[29] was another early auteur of popular music.[25] Authors Jim Cogan and William Clark credit him as the first rock producer to use the studio as a discrete instrument.[29]
According to author David Howard, Martin's work on the Beatles' "Tomorrow Never Knows", from Revolver, and Spector's production of "River Deep – Mountain High" from the same year were the two recordings that ensured that the studio "was now its own instrument".[31] Citing composer and producer Virgil Moorefield's book The Producer as Composer, author Jay Hodgson highlights Revolver as representing a "dramatic turning point" in recording history through its dedication to studio exploration over the "performability" of the songs, as this and subsequent Beatles albums reshaped listeners' preconceptions of a pop recording.[32] According to Julien, the follow-up LP Sgt. Pepper represents the "epitome of the transformation of the recording studio into a compositional tool", marking the moment when "popular music entered the era of phonographic composition."[33] Composer and musicologist Michael Hannan attributes the album's impact to Martin and his engineers, in response to the Beatles' demands, making increasingly creative use of studio equipment and originating new processes.[34]
Like Revolver, "Good Vibrations", which Wilson produced for the Beach Boys in 1966, was a prime proponent in revolutionizing rock from live concert performances into studio productions that could only exist on record.[35] For the first time, Wilson limited himself to recording short interchangeable fragments (or "modules") rather than a complete song. Through the method of tape splicing, each fragment could then be assembled into a linear sequence – as Wilson explored on subsequent recordings from this period – allowing any number of larger structures and divergent moods to be produced at a later time.[36][nb 5] Musicologist Charlie Gillett called "Good Vibrations" "one of the first records to flaunt studio production as a quality in its own right, rather than as a means of presenting a performance",[37] while rock critic Gene Sculatti called it the "ultimate in-studio production trip", adding that its influence was apparent in songs such as "A Day in the Life" from Sgt. Pepper.[38]

1970s–2010s

Brian Eno at a live remix in 2012
  • Adam Bell credits Brian Eno with popularizing the concept of the studio as instrument, particularly that it "did not require previous experience, and in some ways, a lack of know-how might even be advantageous to creativity", and that "such an approach was typified" by Kraftwerk, whose members proclaimed "we play the studio".[15] He goes on to say:

While those of the ilk of Brian Wilson used the studio as an instrument by orchestrating everyone that worked within it, the turn to technology in the cases of Sly Stone, Stevie Wonder, Prince, and Brian Eno signify a conceptual shift in which an alternative approach that might make using the studio as an instrument cheaper, easier, more convenient, or more creative, was increasingly sought after. Compared to the 1960s, using the studio as an instrument became less about working the system as it were, and working the systems.[15]

  • Jamaican producer Lee "Scratch" Perry is noted for his 70s reggae and dub productions, recorded at his Black Ark studio.[39] David Toop commented that "at its heights, Perry's genius has transformed the recording studio" into "virtual space, an imaginary chamber over which presided the electronic wizard, evangelist, gossip columnist and Dr. Frankenstein that he became."[40]
  • From the late 1970s onward, hip hop production has been strongly linked to the lineage and technique of earlier artists who used the studio as an instrument. Jazz critic Francis Davis identified early hip-hop DJs, including Afrika Bambaataa and Grandmaster Flash, as "grassroots successors to Phil Spector, Brian Wilson, and George Martin, the 1960s producers who pioneered the use of the recording studio as an instrument in its own right."[41]
My Bloody Valentine performing in 2008
  • Beginning in the 1980s, musicians associated with the genres dream pop and shoegazing made innovative use of effects pedals and recording techniques to create ethereal, "dreamy" musical atmospheres.[42] The English-Irish shoegazing band My Bloody Valentine, helmed by guitarist-producer Kevin Shields, are often celebrated for their studio albums Isn't Anything (1988) and Loveless (1991). Writing for The Sunday Times, Paul Lester said Shields is "widely accepted as shoegazing's genius", with "his astonishing wall of sound, use of the studio as instrument and dazzling reinvention of the guitar making him a sort of hydra-headed Spector-Hendrix-Eno figure".[43]

See also

References

Notes

  1. ^ His employers often antagonized him over his methods, and to escape this, he developed a home studio in 1960.[5]
  2. ^ For example, Spector would often duplicate a part played by an acoustic piano with an electric piano and a harpsichord.[22] Session guitarist Barney Kessel notes: "Musically, it was terribly simple, but the way he recorded and miked it, they’d diffuse it so that you couldn't pick out any one instrument. Techniques like distortion and echo were not new, but Phil came along and took these to make sounds that had not been used in the past. I thought it was ingenious."[22]
  3. ^ Leiber and Stoller considered Spector's methods to be very distinct from what they were doing, stating: "Phil was the first one to use multiple drum kits, three pianos and so on. We went for much more clarity in terms of instrumental colors, and he deliberately blended everything into a kind of mulch. He definitely had a different point of view."[23]
  4. ^ Academic Bill Martin writes that the advancing technology of multitrack recording and mixing boards were more influential to experimental rock than electronic instruments such as the synthesizer, allowing the Beatles and the Beach Boys to become the first crop of non-classically trained musicians to create extended and complex compositions.[26]
  5. ^ Academic Marshall Heiser saw the resultant style of jumpcuts as a "striking characteristic", and that they "must be acknowledged as compositional statements in themselves, giving the music a sonic signature every bit as noticeable as the performances themselves. There was no way this music could be 'real.' Wilson was therefore echoing the techniques of musique concrète and seemed to be breaking the audio 'fourth wall'—if there can said to be such a thing."[36]

Citations

  1. ^ a b c Greene 2016, p. 179.
  2. ^ Eno 2004, p. 127.
  3. ^ a b Eno 2004, pp. 128–129.
  4. ^ a b Bell 2018, p. 34.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g "A Brief History of The Studio As An Instrument: Part 1 - Early Reflections". Ableton.com. October 25, 2016.
  6. ^ Bell 2018, p. 37.
  7. ^ Seymour, Corey (June 5, 2015). "Love & Mercy Does Justice to the Brilliance of Brian Wilson". Vogue. Retrieved October 31, 2018.
  8. ^ a b Bell 2018, pp. 34–35.
  9. ^ Bell 2018, p. 38.
  10. ^ a b Eno 2004, p. 128.
  11. ^ Cage, J.(2004),'The Future of Music Credo,'in Cox, Christoph; Warner, Daniel. Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music. A&C Black. ISBN 978-0-8264-1615-5.
  12. ^ Holmes, Thomas B.; Holmes, Thom (2002). Electronic and Experimental Music: Pioneers in Technology and Composition. Psychology Press. pp. 81–85. ISBN 978-0-415-93644-6.
  13. ^ Blake 2009, p. 45.
  14. ^ Bell 2018, p. xvi.
  15. ^ a b c Bell 2018, p. 49.
  16. ^ Bell 2018, p. 12, 39.
  17. ^ Patrick, Jonathan (March 8, 2013). "Joe Meek's pop masterpiece I Hear a New World gets the chance to haunt a whole new generation of audiophile geeks". Tiny Mix Tapes.
  18. ^ Bell 2018, p. 39.
  19. ^ Gritten, David (October 1, 2016). "Joe Meek and the tragic demise of the maverick who revolutionised British pop". The Telegraph.
  20. ^ Bannister 2007, p. 38.
  21. ^ Zak 2001, p. 77.
  22. ^ a b Ribowsky 1989, pp. 185-186.
  23. ^ a b Moorefield 2010, p. 10.
  24. ^ "The RS 500 Greatest Songs of All Time". RollingStone.com. Archived from the original on 16 May 2007. Retrieved 2007-06-02.
  25. ^ a b Edmondson 2013, p. 890.
  26. ^ Martin 2015, p. 75.
  27. ^ Millard 2012, pp. 178–79.
  28. ^ Julien 2008, p. 162.
  29. ^ a b Cogan & Clark 2003, pp. 32–33.
  30. ^ Brend 2005, pp. 55–56.
  31. ^ Howard 2004, pp. 2–3.
  32. ^ Hodgson 2010, pp. viii–ix.
  33. ^ Julien 2008, pp. 166–167.
  34. ^ Hannan 2008, p. 46.
  35. ^ Ashby 2004, p. 282.
  36. ^ a b Heiser, Marshall (November 2012). "SMiLE: Brian Wilson's Musical Mosaic". The Journal on the Art of Record Production (7).
  37. ^ Gillett 1984, p. 329.
  38. ^ Sculatti, Gene (September 1968). "Villains and Heroes: In Defense of the Beach Boys". Jazz & Pop. Archived from the original on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 10 July 2014.
  39. ^ Toop 2018, p. 115.
  40. ^ Toop 2018, pp. 114—115.
  41. ^ Davis 2004, p. 259.
  42. ^ Edmondson 2013, p. 1205.
  43. ^ Lester, Paul (April 12, 2009). "Sonic Cathedral spark shoegazing music revival". Times Online. Archived from the original on September 19, 2009.

Bibliography

  • Ashby, Arved Mark, ed. (2004). The Pleasure of Modernist Music: Listening, Meaning, Intention, Ideology. Boydell & Brewer. ISBN 978-1-58046-143-6.
  • Bannister, Matthew (2007). White Boys, White Noise: Masculinities and 1980s Indie Guitar Rock. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. ISBN 978-0-7546-8803-7.
  • Bell, Adam Patrick (2018). Dawn of the DAW: The Studio As Musical Instrument. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-029660-5.
  • Blake, Andrew (2009). "Recording practices and the role of the producer". In Cook, Nicholas; Clarke, Eric; Leech-Wilkinson, Daniel. The Cambridge Companion to Recorded Music. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-82796-6.
  • Brend, Mark (2005). Strange Sounds: Offbeat Instruments and Sonic Experiments in Pop. San Francisco, CA: Backbeat Books. ISBN 978-0-879308551.
  • Cogan, Jim; Clark, William (2003). Temples of Sound: Inside the Great Recording Studios. Chronicle Books. ISBN 978-0-8118-3394-3.
  • Davis, Francis (2004). Jazz and Its Discontents: A Francis Davis Reader. Da Capo. ISBN 0-306-81055-7.
  • Edmondson, Jacqueline, ed. (2013). Music in American Life: An Encyclopedia of the Songs, Styles, Stars, and Stories that Shaped our Culture. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-0-313-39348-8.
  • Eno, Brian (2004). "The Studio as Compositional Tool" (PDF). In Cox, Christoph; Warner, Daniel. Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music. A&C Black. ISBN 978-0-8264-1615-5.
  • Gillett, Charlie (1984). The Sound of the City: The Rise of Rock and Roll. Perseus Books Group. ISBN 978-0-306-80683-4.
  • Greene, Doyle (2016). Rock, Counterculture and the Avant-Garde, 1966–1970: How the Beatles, Frank Zappa and the Velvet Underground Defined an Era. McFarland. ISBN 978-1-4766-2403-7.
  • Hannan, Michael (2008). "The sound design of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band". In Julien, Olivier. Sgt. Pepper and the Beatles: It Was Forty Years Ago Today. Ashgate. ISBN 978-0-7546-6708-7.
  • Hodgson, Jay (2010). Understanding Records: A Field Guide to Recording Practice. New York, NY: Continuum. ISBN 978-1-4411-5607-5.
  • Howard, David N. (2004). Sonic Alchemy: Visionary Music Producers and Their Maverick Recordings. Milwaukee, WI: Hal Leonard. ISBN 0-634-05560-7.
  • Julien, Oliver (2008). "'A lucky man who made the grade': Sgt. Pepper and the rise of a phonographic tradition in twentieth-century popular music". In Julien, Olivier. Sgt. Pepper and the Beatles: It Was Forty Years Ago Today. Ashgate. ISBN 978-0-7546-6708-7.
  • Martin, Bill (2015). Avant Rock: Experimental Music from the Beatles to Bjork. Open Court Publishing Company. ISBN 978-0-8126-9939-5.
  • Millard, André (2012). Beatlemania: Technology, Business, and Teen Culture in Cold War America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-1-4214-0525-4.
  • Moorefield, Virgil (2010). The Producer as Composer: Shaping the Sounds of Popular Music. MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-13457-8.
  • Ribowsky, Mark (1989). He's a Rebel. Dutton. ISBN 978-0-525-24727-2.
  • Toop, David (2018) [First published 1995]. Ocean of Sound: Ambient Sound and Radical Listening in the Age of Communication. Serpent's Tail. ISBN 978-1-78816-030-8.
  • Zak, Albin (2001). Poetics of Rock: Cutting Tracks, Making Records. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-92815-2.

Further reading

  • Eller, Dylan (March 28, 2016). "Revisiting Brian Eno's 'The Studio as a Compositional Tool'". TechCrunch.
  • Schmidt Horning, Susan (2016) [1st pub. 2012 by Ashgate]. "The Sounds of Space: Studio as Instrument in the Era of High Fidelity". In Frith, Simon; Zagorski-Thomas, Simon. The Art of Record Production: An Introductory Reader for a New Academic Field. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-4094-0562-7.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Recording_studio_as_an_instrument&oldid=868956165"
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recording_studio_as_musical_instrument
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Recording studio as an instrument"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA