Protozoa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Protozoan)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Clockwise from top left: Blepharisma japonicum, a ciliate; Giardia muris, a parasitic flagellate; Centropyxis aculeata, a testate (shelled) amoeba; Peridinium willei, a dinoflagellate; Chaos carolinense, a naked amoebozoan; Desmerella moniliformis, a choanoflagellate

Protozoa (also protozoan, plural protozoans) is an informal term for single-celled eukaryotes, either free-living or parasitic, which feed on organic matter such as other microorganisms or organic tissues and debris.[1][2] Historically, the protozoa were regarded as "one-celled animals", because they often possess animal-like behaviors, such as motility and predation, and lack a cell wall, as found in plants and many algae.[3][4] Although the traditional practice of grouping of protozoa with animals is no longer considered valid, the term continues to be used in a loose way to identify single-celled organisms that can move independently and feed by heterotrophy.

In some systems of biological classification, Protozoa is a high-level taxonomic group. When first introduced in 1818, Protozoa was erected as a taxonomic class,[5] but in later classification schemes it was elevated to a variety of higher ranks, including phylum, subkingdom and kingdom. In a series of classifications proposed by Thomas Cavalier-Smith and his collaborators since 1981, Protozoa has been ranked as a kingdom.[6][7][8] The seven-kingdom scheme presented by Ruggiero et al. in 2015, places eight phyla under Kingdom Protozoa: Euglenozoa, Amoebozoa, Metamonada, Choanozoa, Loukozoa, Percolozoa, Microsporidia and Sulcozoa.[9] Notably, this kingdom excludes several major groups of organisms traditionally placed among the protozoa, including the ciliates, dinoflagellates, foraminifera, and the parasitic apicomplexans, all of which are classified under Kingdom Chromista. Kingdom Protozoa, as defined in this scheme, does not form a natural group or clade, but a paraphyletic group or evolutionary grade, within which the members of Fungi, Animalia and Chromista are thought to have evolved.[9]

The use of Protozoa as a formal taxon has been discouraged by some recent researchers, mainly because the term, which is formed from the Greek πρῶτος prōtos "first" and ζῶον ζῶα zōa, plural of ζῶον zōon, "animal", implies kinship with animals (metazoa)[10][11] and promotes an arbitrary separation of "animal-like" from "plant-like" organisms.[12] Modern ultrastructural, biochemical, and genetic techniques have shown that protozoa, as traditionally defined, belong to widely divergent lineages distributed across the eukaryotic tree of life, and can no longer be regarded as "primitive animals". For this reason, the terms "protists", "Protista" or "Protoctista" are sometimes preferred for the high-level classification of eukaryotic microorganisms. In 2005, members of the Society of Protozoologists voted to change the name of that organization to the International Society of Protistologists.[13]

History and terminology

Illustration of class Protozoa, order Infusoria, family Monades by Georg August Goldfuss

The word "protozoa" (singular protozoon or protozoan) was coined in 1818 by zoologist Georg August Goldfuss, as the Greek equivalent of the German Urthiere, meaning "primitive, or original animals" (ur- ‘proto-’ + Thier ‘animal’). Goldfuss created Protozoa as a class containing what he believed to be the simplest animals. Originally, the group included not only single-celled microorganisms but also some "lower" multicellular animals, such as rotifers, corals, sponges, jellyfish, bryozoa and polychaete worms.[5]

In 1848, as a result of advancements in cell theory pioneered by Theodor Schwann and Matthias Schleiden, the anatomist and zoologist C.T. von Siebold proposed that the bodies of protozoans such as ciliates and amoebae were made up of single cells, similar to those from which the multicellular tissues of plants and animals were constructed. Von Siebold redefined Protozoa to include only such unicellular forms, to the exclusion of all metazoa (animals).[14] At the same time, he raised the group to the level of a phylum containing two broad classes of microorganisms: Infusoria (mostly ciliates and flagellated algae), and Rhizopoda (amoeboid organisms). The definition of Protozoa as a phylum or sub-kingdom made up of "unicellular animals" was adopted by the zoologist Otto Bütschli—celebrated at his centenary as the "architect of protozoology"[15]—and the term came into wide use.

John Hogg's illustration of the Four Kingdoms of Nature, showing "Primigenal" as a greenish haze at the base of the Animals and Plants, 1860

As a phylum under Animalia, the Protozoa were firmly rooted in the old "two-kingdom" classification of life, according to which all living beings were classified as either animals or plants. As long as this scheme remained dominant, the protozoa were understood to be animals and studied in departments of Zoology, while photosynthetic microorganisms and microscopic fungi—the so-called Protophyta—were assigned to the Plants, and studied in departments of Botany.[16]

Criticism of this system began in the latter half of the 19th century, with the realization that many organisms met the criteria for inclusion among both plants and animals. For example, the algae Euglena and Dinobryon have chloroplasts for photosynthesis, but can also feed on organic matter and are motile. In 1860, John Hogg argued against the use of "protozoa", on the grounds that "naturalists are divided in opinion—and probably some will ever continue so—whether many of these organisms, or living beings, are animals or plants."[17] As an alternative, he proposed a new kingdom called Primigenum, consisting of both the protozoa and unicellular algae (protophyta), which he combined together under the name "Protoctista". In Hoggs's conception, the animal and plant kingdoms were likened to two great "pyramids" blending at their bases in the Kingdom Primigenum.

Six years later, Ernst Haeckel also proposed a third kingdom of life, which he named Protista. At first, Haeckel included a few multicellular organisms in this kingdom, but in later work he restricted the Protista to single-celled organisms, or simple colonies whose individual cells are not differentiated into different kinds of tissues.

Despite these proposals, Protozoa emerged as the preferred taxonomic placement for heterotrophic microorganisms such as amoebae and ciliates, and remained so for more than a century. In the course of the 20th century, however, the old "two kingdom" system began to weaken, with the growing awareness that fungi did not belong among the plants, and that most of the unicellular protozoa were no more closely related to the animals than they were to the plants. By mid-century, some biologists, such as Herbert Copeland, Robert H. Whittaker and Lynn Margulis, advocated the revival of Haeckel's Protista or Hogg's Protoctista as a kingdom-level eukaryotic group, alongside Plants, Animals and Fungi.[16] A variety of multi-kingdom systems were proposed, and Kingdoms Protista and Protoctista became well established in biology texts and curricula.[18][19][20]

While many taxonomists have abandoned Protozoa as a high-level group, Thomas Cavalier-Smith has retained it as a kingdom in the various classifications he has proposed. As of 2015, Cavalier-Smith's Protozoa excludes several major groups of organisms traditionally placed among the protozoa, including the ciliates, dinoflagellates and foraminifera (all members of the SAR supergroup). In its current form, his kingdom Protozoa is a paraphyletic group which includes a common ancestor and most of its descendents, but excludes two important clades that branch within it: the animals and fungi.[9]

Characteristics

Size

Protozoa, as traditionally defined, range in size from as little as 1 micrometre to several millimetres, or more.[21] Among the largest are the deep-sea–dwelling xenophyophores, single-celled foraminifera whose shells can reach 20 cm in diameter.[22]

The ciliate Spirostomum ambiguum can attain 3 mm in length
Species or cell type Size in micrometres
Plasmodium falciparum (malaria parasite, trophozoite phase)[23] 1-2
Massisteria voersi (free-living cercozoan amoeboid)[24] 2.3–3
Bodo saltans (free living kinetoplastid flagellate)[25] 5-8
Plasmodium falciparum (malaria parasite, gametocyte phase)[26] 7-14
Trypanosoma cruzi (parasitic kinetoplastid, Chagas disease)[27] 14-24
Entamoeba histolytica (parasitic amoebozoan)[28] 15–60
Balantidium coli (parasitic ciliate)[29] 50-100
Paramecium caudatum (free-living ciliate)[30] 120-330
Amoeba proteus (free-living amoebozoan)[31] 220–760
Noctiluca scintillans (free-living dinoflagellate)[32] 700–2000
Syringammina fragilissima (foraminiferan amoeboid)[22] up to 200000

Habitat

Free-living protozoans are common and often abundant in fresh, brackish and salt water, as well as other moist environments, such as soils and mosses. Some species thrive in extreme environments such as hot springs[33] and hypersaline lakes and lagoons.[34] All protozoa require a moist habitat; however, some can survive for long periods of time in dry environments, by forming resting cysts which enable them to remain dormant until conditions improve.

Parasitic and symbiotic protozoa live on or within other organisms, including vertebrates and invertebrates, as well as plants and other single-celled organisms. Some are harmless or beneficial to their host organisms; others may be significant causes of diseases, such as babesia, malaria and toxoplasmosis.

Isotricha intestinalis, a ciliate present in the rumen of sheep.

Association between protozoan symbionts and their host organisms can be mutually beneficial. Flagellated protozoans such as Trichonympha and Pyrsonympha inhabit the guts of termites, where they enable their insect host to digest wood by helping to break down complex sugars into smaller, more easily-digested molecules.[35] A wide range of protozoans live commensally in the rumens of ruminant animals, such as cattle and sheep. These include flagellates, such as Trichomonas, and ciliated protozoa, such as Isotricha and Entodinium.[36] The ciliate subclass Astomatia is made up entirely of mouthless symbionts adapted for life in the guts of annelid worms.[37]

Feeding

By definition, all protozoans are heterotrophic, deriving nutrients from other organisms, either by ingesting them whole or consuming their organic remains and waste-products. Some protozoans take in food by phagocytosis, engulfing organic particles with pseudopodia (as amoebae do), or taking in food through a specialized mouth-like aperture called a cytostome. Some protozoans take in food by osmotrophy, absorbing dissolved nutrients through their cell membranes.

Parasitic protozoans use a wide variety of feeding strategies, and some may change methods of feeding in different phases of their life cycle. For instance, the malaria parasite Plasmodium feeds by pinocytosis during its immature trophozoite stage of life (ring phase), but develops a dedicated feeding organelle (cytostome) as it matures within a host's red blood cell.[38]

Paramecium bursaria, a ciliate which derives some of its nutrients from algal endosymbionts in the genusChlorella

Protozoa may also live as mixotrophs, supplementing a heterotrophic diet with some form of autotrophy. Some protozoa form close associations with symbiotic photosynthetic algae, which live and grow within the membranes of the larger cell and provide nutrients to the host. Others practice kleptoplasty, stealing chloroplasts from prey organisms and maintaining them within their own cell bodies as they continue to produce nutrients through photosynthesis. The ciliate Mesodinium rubrum retains functioning plastids from the cryptophyte algae on which it feeds, using them to nourish themselves by autotrophy. These, in turn, may be passed along to dinoflagellates of the genus Dinophysis , which prey on Mesodinium rubrum but keep the enslaved plastids for themselves. Within Dinophysis, these plastids can continue to function for months.[39]

Motility

Organisms traditionally classified as protozoa are abundant in aqueous environments and soil, occupying a range of trophic levels. The group includes flagellates (which move with the help of whip-like structures called flagella), ciliates (which move by using hair-like structures called cilia) and amoebae (which move by the use of foot-like structures called pseudopodia). Some protozoa are sessile, and do not move at all.

Pellicle

Unlike plants, fungi and most types of algae, protozoans do not typically have a rigid cell wall, but are usually enveloped by elastic structures of membranes that permit movement of the cell. In some protozoans, such as the ciliates and euglenozoans, the cell is supported by a composite membranous envelope called the "pellicle." The pellicle gives some shape to the cell, especially during locomotion. Pellicles of protozoan organisms vary from flexible and elastic to fairly rigid. In ciliates and Apicomplexa, the pellicle is supported by closely packed vesicles called alveoli. In euglenids, it is formed from protein strips arranged spirally along the length of the body. Familiar examples of protists with a pellicle are the euglenoids and the ciliate Paramecium. In some protozoa, the pellicle hosts epibiotic bacteria that adhere to the surface by their fimbriae (attachment pili).[40]

Resting cyst of ciliated protozoan Dileptus viridis.

Life cycle

Life cycle of parasitic protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii

Some protozoa have two-phase life cycles, alternating between proliferative stages (e.g., trophozoites) and dormant cysts. As cysts, protozoa can survive harsh conditions, such as exposure to extreme temperatures or harmful chemicals, or long periods without access to nutrients, water, or oxygen for periods of time. Being a cyst enables parasitic species to survive outside of a host, and allows their transmission from one host to another. When protozoa are in the form of trophozoites (Greek tropho = to nourish), they actively feed. The conversion of a trophozoite to cyst form is known as encystation, while the process of transforming back into a trophozoite is known as excystation.

All protozoans reproduce asexually by binary fission or multiple fission. Many protozoan species exchange genetic material by sexual means (typically, through conjugation); however, sexuality is generally decoupled from the process of reproduction, and does not immediately result in increased population.[41]

Although meiotic sex is widespread among present day eukaryotes, it has, until recently, been unclear whether or not eukaryotes were sexual early in their evolution. Due to recent advances in gene detection and other techniques, evidence has been found for some form of meiotic sex in an increasing number of protozoans of ancient lineage that diverged early in eukaryotic evolution.[42] (See eukaryote reproduction.) Thus, such findings suggest that meiotic sex arose early in eukaryotic evolution. Examples of protozoan meiotic sexuality are described in the articles Amoebozoa, Giardia lamblia, Leishmania, Plasmodium falciparum biology, Paramecium, Toxoplasma gondii, Trichomonas vaginalis and Trypanosoma brucei.

Classification

Historically, the Protozoa were classified as "unicellular animals", as distinct from the Protophyta, single-celled photosynthetic organisms (algae) which were considered primitive plants. Both groups were commonly given the rank of phylum, under the kingdom Protista.[43] In older systems of classification, the phylum Protozoa was commonly divided into several sub-groups, reflecting the means of locomotion:[44] Classification schemes differed, but throughout much of the 20th century the major groups of Protozoa included:

With the emergence of molecular phylogenetics and tools enabling researchers to directly compare the DNA of different organisms, it became evident that, of the main sub-groups of Protozoa, only the ciliates (Ciliophora) formed a natural group, or monophyletic clade (that is, a distinct lineage of organisms sharing common ancestry). The other classes or subphyla of Protozoa were all polyphyletic groups made up of organisms that, despite similarities of appearance or way of life, were not necessarily closely related to one another. In the system of eukaryote classification currently endorsed by the International Society of Protistologists, members of the old phylum Protozoa have been distributed among a variety of supergroups.[45]

Ecological role

As components of the micro- and meiofauna, protozoa are an important food source for microinvertebrates. Thus, the ecological role of protozoa in the transfer of bacterial and algal production to successive trophic levels is important. As predators, they prey upon unicellular or filamentous algae, bacteria, and microfungi. Protozoan species include both herbivores and consumers in the decomposer link of the food chain. They also control bacteria populations and biomass to some extent.

Diseases

In humans

Trophozoites of the amoebic dysentery pathogen Entamoeba histolytica with ingested human red blood cells (dark circles)

A number of protozoan pathogens are human parasites, causing diseases such as malaria (by Plasmodium), amoebiasis, giardiasis, toxoplasmosis, cryptosporidiosis, trichomoniasis, Chagas disease, leishmaniasis, African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness), amoebic dysentery, acanthamoeba keratitis, and primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (naegleriasis).

In other animals

The protozoan Ophryocystis elektroscirrha is a parasite of butterfly larvae, passed from female to caterpillar. Severely infected individuals are weak, unable to expand their wings, or unable to eclose, and have shortened lifespans, but parasite levels vary in populations. Infection creates a culling effect, whereby infected migrating animals are less likely to complete the migration. This results in populations with lower parasite loads at the end of the migration.[46] This is not the case in laboratory or commercial rearing, where after a few generations, all individuals can be infected.[47]

References

  1. ^ Panno, Joseph (14 May 2014). The Cell: Evolution of the First Organism. Infobase Publishing. ISBN 9780816067367. 
  2. ^ Bertrand, Jean-Claude; Caumette, Pierre; Lebaron, Philippe; Matheron, Robert; Normand, Philippe; Sime-Ngando, Télesphore (2015-01-26). Environmental Microbiology: Fundamentals and Applications: Microbial Ecology. Springer. ISBN 9789401791182. 
  3. ^ Madigan, Michael T. (2012). Brock Biology of Microorganisms. Benjamin Cummings. ISBN 9780321649638. 
  4. ^ Yaeger, Robert G. (1996). "Protozoa: Structure, Classification, Growth, and Development". NCBI. Retrieved 2018-03-23. 
  5. ^ a b Goldfuss, Georg August (1820). Handbuch der Zoologie. Nuremberg: J. L. Schrag. pp. 11–16. 
  6. ^ Cavalier-Smith, T. (1981). "Eukaryote kingdoms: seven or nine?". Bio Systems. 14 (3–4): 461–481. doi:10.1016/0303-2647(81)90050-2. ISSN 0303-2647. PMID 7337818. 
  7. ^ Cavalier-Smith, T. (December 1993). "Kingdom protozoa and its 18 phyla". Microbiological Reviews. 57 (4): 953–994. ISSN 0146-0749. PMC 372943Freely accessible. PMID 8302218. 
  8. ^ Cavalier-Smith, Thomas (23 June 2010). "Kingdoms Protozoa and Chromista and the eozoan root of the eukaryotic tree". Biology Letters. 6 (3): 342–345. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0948. ISSN 1744-9561. PMC 2880060Freely accessible. PMID 20031978. 
  9. ^ a b c Ruggiero, Michael A.; Gordon, Dennis P.; Orrell, Thomas M.; Bailly, Nicolas; Bourgoin, Thierry; Brusca, Richard C.; Cavalier-Smith, Thomas; Guiry, Michael D.; Kirk, Paul M. (29 April 2015). "A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms". PLoS ONE. 10 (4): e0119248. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1019248R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119248. PMC 4418965Freely accessible. PMID 25923521. Retrieved 2015-05-01. 
  10. ^ Hogg, John (1860). "On the distinctions of a plant and an animal and on a fourth kingdom of Nature". Edinb N Phil J (N Ser). 12: 216–225. 
  11. ^ Scamardella, J. M. (December 1999). "Not plants or animals: a brief history of the origin of Kingdoms Protozoa, Protista and Protoctista". International Microbiology. 2 (4): 207–216. ISSN 1139-6709. PMID 10943416. 
  12. ^ Copeland, Herbert F. (September–October 1947). "Progress Report on Basic Classification". The American Naturalist. 81 (800): 340–361. doi:10.1086/281531. JSTOR 2458229. 
  13. ^ "New President's Address". protozoa.uga.edu. Retrieved 2015-05-01. 
  14. ^ "Details - Lehrbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirbellosen Thiere / von C. Th. v. Siebold. - Biodiversity Heritage Library". www.biodiversitylibrary.org. Retrieved 2015-05-20. 
  15. ^ Dobell, C. (April 1951). "In memoriam Otto Bütschli (1848-1920) "architect of protozoology"". Isis; an International Review Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences. 42 (127): 20–22. ISSN 0021-1753. PMID 14831973. 
  16. ^ a b Taylor, F. J. R. ‘Max’ (11 January 2003). "The collapse of the two-kingdom system, the rise of protistology and the founding of the International Society for Evolutionary Protistology (ISEP)". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 53 (6): 1707–1714. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.02587-0. ISSN 1466-5026. PMID 14657097. 
  17. ^ Hogg, John (1860). "On the distinctions of a plant and an animal, and on a fourth kingdom of nature". Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal. 
  18. ^ Whittaker, R. H. (10 January 1969). "New concepts of kingdoms or organisms. Evolutionary relations are better represented by new classifications than by the traditional two kingdoms". Science. 163 (3863): 150–160. Bibcode:1969Sci...163..150W. doi:10.1126/science.163.3863.150. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 5762760. 
  19. ^ Margulis, Lynn (1974). "Five-Kingdom Classification and the Origin and Evolution of Cells". In Dobzhansky, Theodosius; Hecht, Max K.; Steere, William C. Evolutionary Biology. Springer US. pp. 45–78. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6944-2_2. ISBN 978-1-4615-6946-6. 
  20. ^ Cavalier-Smith T (August 1998). "A revised six-kingdom system of life". Biological Reviews. 73 (3): 203–266. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1998.tb00030.x. PMID 9809012. Retrieved 2015-06-09. 
  21. ^ Singleton, Paul; Sainsbury, Diana (2001). Dictionary of microbiology and molecular biology. Wiley. ISBN 9780471941507. 
  22. ^ a b Gooday, A.J.; Aranda da Silva, A. P.; Pawlowski, J. (1 December 2011). "Xenophyophores (Rhizaria, Foraminifera) from the Nazaré Canyon (Portuguese margin, NE Atlantic)". Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 58 (24–25): 2401–2419. Bibcode:2011DSRII..58.2401G. doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2011.04.005. Retrieved 2018-04-06. 
  23. ^ Ghaffar, Abdul. "Blood and Tissue Protozoa". Microbiology and Immunology On-Line. Retrieved 2018-03-23. 
  24. ^ Mylnikov, Alexander P.; Weber, Felix; Jürgens, Klaus; Wylezich, Claudia (August 2015). "Massisteria marina has a sister: Massisteria voersi sp. nov., a rare species isolated from coastal waters of the Baltic Sea". European Journal of Protistology. 51 (4): 299–310. doi:10.1016/j.ejop.2015.05.002. ISSN 1618-0429. PMID 26163290. 
  25. ^ Mitchell, Gary C.; Baker, J. H.; Sleigh, M. A. (1 May 1988). "Feeding of a freshwater flagellate, Bodo saltans, on diverse bacteria". The Journal of Protozoology. 35 (2): 219–222. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1988.tb04327.x. ISSN 1550-7408. 
  26. ^ Ghaffar, Abdul. "Blood and tissue Protozoa". Microbiology and Immunology On-Line. Retrieved 2018-03-23. 
  27. ^ "Trypanosoma brucei". parasite.org.au. Retrieved 2018-03-23. 
  28. ^ "Microscopy of Entamoeba histolytica". msu.edu. Retrieved 2016-08-21. 
  29. ^ Lehman, Don. "Diagnostic parasitology". University of Delaware. Retrieved 2018-03-23. 
  30. ^ Taylor, Bruce. "Paramecium caudatum". Encyclopedia of Life. Retrieved 2018-03-23. 
  31. ^ "Amoeba proteus | Microworld". www.arcella.nl. Retrieved 2016-08-21. 
  32. ^ "Noctiluca scintillans". University of Tasmania, Australia. Retrieved 2018-03-23. 
  33. ^ Sheehan, Kathy B. (2005). Seen and Unseen: Discovering the Microbes of Yellowstone. Falcon. ISBN 9780762730933. 
  34. ^ Post, F. J.; Borowitzka, L. J.; Borowitzka, M. A.; Mackay, B.; Moulton, T. (1983-09-01). "The protozoa of a Western Australian hypersaline lagoon". Hydrobiologia. 105 (1): 95–113. doi:10.1007/BF00025180. ISSN 0018-8158. 
  35. ^ "Termite gut microbes | NOLL LAB". www.kennethnoll.uconn.edu. Retrieved 2018-03-21. 
  36. ^ Williams, A. G.; Coleman, G. S. (1997). The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 73–139. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_3. ISBN 9789401071499. 
  37. ^ Lee, John J.; Leedale, Gordon F.; Bradbury, Phyllis Clarke (25 May 2000). An illustrated guide to the protozoa: organisms traditionally referred to as protozoa, or newly discovered groups. Society of Protozoologists. p. 634. 
  38. ^ Wiser, Mark F. "Biochemistry of Plasmodium". The Wiser Page. Retrieved 2018-03-22. 
  39. ^ Nishitani, Goh; Nagai, Satoshi; Baba, Katsuhisa; Kiyokawa, Susumu; Kosaka, Yuki; Miyamura, Kazuyoshi; Nishikawa, Tetsuya; Sakurada, Kiyonari; Shinada, Akiyoshi (May 2010). "High-Level Congruence of Myrionecta rubra Prey and Dinophysis Species Plastid Identities as Revealed by Genetic Analyses of Isolates from Japanese Coastal Waters". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 76 (9): 2791–2798. doi:10.1128/AEM.02566-09. ISSN 0099-2240. PMC 2863437Freely accessible. PMID 20305031. 
  40. ^ Protozoa in biological research
  41. ^ "Sex and Death in Protozoa". Cambridge University Press. Retrieved 2015-06-09. 
  42. ^ Bernstein H, Bernstein C (2013). Bernstein C, Bernstein H eds. Evolutionary Origin and Adaptive Function of Meiosis'. Meiosis. InTech. ISBN 978-953-51-1197-9
  43. ^ Kudo, Richard R. (Richard Roksabro) (1954). Protozoology. MBLWHOI Library. Springfield, Ill., C. C. Thomas. 
  44. ^ Honigberg, B. M.; W. Balamuth; E. C. Bovee; J. O. Corliss; M. Gojdics; R. P. Hall; R. R. Kudo; N. D. Levine; A. R. Lobblich; J. Weiser (February 1964). "A Revised Classification of the Phylum Protozoa". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 11 (1): 7–20. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1964.tb01715.x. 
  45. ^ Adl, Sina M.; Simpson, Alastair G. B.; Lane, Christopher E.; Lukeš, Julius; Bass, David; Bowser, Samuel S.; Brown, Matthew W.; Burki, Fabien; Dunthorn, Micah (2012-09-01). "The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 59 (5): 429–514. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x. ISSN 1550-7408. PMC 3483872Freely accessible. 
  46. ^ Bartel, Rebecca; Oberhauser, Karen; De Roode, Jacob; Atizer, Sonya (February 2011). "Monarch butterfly migration and parasite transmission in eastern North America". Ecology. 92 (2): 342–351. doi:10.1890/10-0489.1. PMID 21618914. 
  47. ^ Leong, K. L. H.; M. A. Yoshimura; H. K. Kaya; H. Williams (January 1997). "Instar Susceptibility of the Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) to the Neogregarine Parasite, Ophryocystis elektroscirrha". Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 69 (1): 79–83. doi:10.1006/jipa.1996.4634. PMID 9028932. Lay summary. 

Bibliography

General
  • Dogiel, V. A., revised by J.I. Poljanskij and E. M. Chejsin. General Protozoology, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 1965.
  • Hausmann, K., N. Hulsmann. Protozoology. Thieme Verlag; New York, 1996.
  • Kudo, R.R. Protozoology. Springfield, Illinois: C.C. Thomas, 1954; 4th ed.
  • Manwell, R.D. Introduction to Protozoology, second revised edition, Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1968.
  • Roger Anderson, O. Comparative protozoology: ecology, physiology, life history. Berlin [etc.]: Springer-Verlag, 1988.
  • Sleigh, M. The Biology of Protozoa. E. Arnold: London, 1981.
Identification
  • Jahn,T.L.- Bovee, E.C. & Jahn, F.F. How to Know the Protozoa. Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Div. of McGraw Hill, Dubuque, Iowa, 1979; 2nd ed.
  • Lee, J.J., Leedale, G.F. & Bradbury, P. An Illustrated Guide to the Protozoa. Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A: Society of Protozoologists, 2000; 2nd ed.
  • Patterson, D.J. Free-Living Freshwater Protozoa. A Colour Guide. Manson Publishing; London, 1996.
  • Patterson, D.J., M.A. Burford. A Guide to the Protozoa of Marine Aquaculture Ponds. CSIRO Publishing, 2001.
Morphology
  • Harrison, F.W., Corliss, J.O. (ed.). 1991. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, vol. 1, Protozoa. New York: Wiley-Liss, 512 pp.
  • Pitelka, D. R. 1963. Electron-Microscopic Structure of Protozoa. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Physiology and biochemistry
  • Nisbet, B. 1984. Nutrition and feeding strategies in Protozoa. Croom Helm Publ., London, 280 pp.
  • Coombs, G.H. & North, M. 1991. Biochemical protozoology. Taylor & Francis, London, Washington.
  • Laybourn-Parry J. 1984. A Functional Biology of Free-Living Protozoa. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
  • Levandowski, M., S.H. Hutner (eds). 1979. Biochemistry and physiology of protozoa. Volumes 1, 2, and 3. Academic Press: New York, NY; 2nd ed.
  • Sukhareva-Buell, N.N. 2003. Biologically active substances of protozoa. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ecology
  • Capriulo, G.M. (ed.). 1990. Ecology of Marine Protozoa. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
  • Darbyshire, J.F. (ed.). 1994. Soil Protozoa. CAB International: Wallingford, U.K. 2009 pp.
  • Laybourn-Parry, J. 1992. Protozoan plankton ecology. Chapman & Hall, New York. 213 pp.
  • Fenchel, T. 1987. Ecology of protozoan: The biology of free-living phagotrophic protists. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 197 pp.
Parasitology
  • Kreier, J.P. (ed.). 1991-1995. Parasitic Protozoa, 2nd ed. 10 vols (1-3 coedited by Baker, J.R.). Academic Press, San Diego, California, [1].
Methods

Lee, J. J., & Soldo, A. T. (1992). Protocols in protozoology. Kansas, USA: Society of Protozoologists, Lawrence, [2].

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Protozoa&oldid=849613389"
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protozoan
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Protozoa"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA