Great Hanging at Gainesville

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Illustration from Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper, 20 February 1864.

The Great Hanging at Gainesville was the execution by hanging of forty-one suspected Unionists in Gainesville, Texas, in October 1862 during the American Civil War. Two additional suspects were shot by Confederate troops while trying to escape. Some 150–200 men were captured and arrested by state Confederate troops in and near Cooke County at a time when numerous citizens of North Texas were opposed to the new law on conscription. Many suspects were tried by a "Citizens' Court" organized by a Confederate officer. It made up its own rules for conviction and had no status under state law. Although only 11% of county households owned slaves, seven of the 12 men on the jury were slaveholders, determined to suppress dissent.

The suspects were executed one or two at a time. After several men had been convicted and executed, mob pressure built against remaining suspects. The jury gave the mob fourteen names and these men were lynched without trial. After having been acquitted, another nineteen men were returned to court and convicted, with no new evidence; they were hanged, all largely because of mob pressure. Most of the victims were residents of Cooke County. In total, this is claimed to be the largest mass hanging in the history of the United States.[1] The Confederate and state courts ended the Citizens Court activities; President Davis had already dismissed General Paul Octave Hébert as military commander of the state, but Confederate military abuses continued in North Texas.

In the 21st century, Gainesville struggles to accept its history. There has been a privately organized, annual commemoration of the hangings since 2007. The Cooke County Heritage Society planned a formal commemoration in 2012 to mark the 150th anniversary of the Great Hanging. They cancelled it when the mayor objected, but a private event brought together descendants of several victims at a family reunion organized with speakers to discuss the event. In 2014 a memorial was installed near the execution site that commemorates the event and its victims.

Background

Colonization of North Texas, situated on the Forks of the Trinity River, began in 1841 with an agreement between William S. Peters and the Republic of Texas in 1841. Peters enticed settlers by promising to supply in exchange for half their land. Cooke County was created in 1848 and the next year, US Army Captain Randolph B. Marcy surveyed a trail that crossed the Red River and ran through the county. Early settlement was difficult. Peters did not send any support and was generally distant; settlers generally resorted to vigilante justice. Henry O. Hedgecoxe, sent by Peters to press for his share of the land, was run out of North Texas in July 1852. As a result, Texas Governor Peter H. Bell called a session of the Texas legislature in January 1853 that forced Peters to settle all disputes with the settlers in their favor. On 26 January 1854, Gainesville was officially designated the seat of Cooke County. The first stagecoach of the Butterfield Overland mail route arrived through Gainesville on 20 September 1858. The route brought a rapid rise in Gainesville's population to 280 people in 1860. The majority of settlers from the Butterfield route settled in homesteads concentrated in either the East Crosswoods, the Elm Fork of the Trinity to Gainesville's south, or on the Red River to the north.[2]

Of the 421,294 free citizens of Texas as counted in the 1860 Census, nearly two thirds were born outside of Texas. The majority of Texans came from the Upper South, but slaveholding Lower Southerners were preeminent and disproportionately represented in Texas's government. The production of cotton, which had exploded over sevenfold in Texas over the 1850s, made slaveholders rich and connected the state's leaders to the future Confederacy. Cooke County had a similar transition of power while its population remained overwhelmingly non-slaveholding. By 1860, only 10.9% of Cooke County households owned slaves.[a] Among them were the county's chief justice, sheriff Alexander Boutwell, and three out of the four county commissioners. Other important slaveholders were Daniel Montague and James G. Bourland, a former Texas state senator, and James W. Throckmorton, a member of the Texas legislature who was critical to the settlement with Peters in 1853. The slaveholders also controlled the volunteer state militias and often led them on expeditions against nearby Native Americans raiding Cooke and other North Texas counties. Extralegal violence against Natives was commonplace and cyclical, as was vigilante justice enacted on suspected white collaborators and abolitionists.[4]

New arrivals brought by the Butterfield Overland route were either suspected of abolitionism, or were abolitionist. Among the latter were Methodist preachers who did not recognize the 1844 schism in the church over slavery and were violently repressed by vigilantes. When a series of fires caused significant damage to North Texas, tensions flared and then exploded into violence when it was proven that phosphorous matches, which had made their first appearance in Dallas that summer, had not caused the fires. Three slaves were hung in Dallas, a hundred others whipped, and many free Northern Texans who had not already fled were murdered by vigilantes. Despite growing secessionism in Texas, Cooke County increasingly cast its lot against the incumbent Southern Democrats. Nearby US Army forts, which did business with North Texan slaveholders, provided protection against Native American raids. Cooke County residents furthermore did not have an economic dependence on slavery, and were unwilling to sacrifice their security to defend it. In the 1859 gubernatorial elections, 73% of Cooke County residents voted for Unionist Sam Houston, who downplayed the fires and posed himself as a moderate against Democrat Hardin Runnels, whose border security policies Houston decried as a failure. As in the rest of the Antebellum South however, John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry and the election of Abraham Lincoln eliminated backlash against secession in Texas. In North Texas, slaveholders began holding secessionist rallies in late 1860, though the sentiment was not unanimous in Cooke County or the governments of Texas and United States. The January 1861 session of the Texas legislature overwhelmingly voted in favor of secession, to which Throckmorton was a vocal and leading opponent. A referendum, marred with secessionist violence and intimidation, was held in February. 61% of Cooke County votes were for staying in the Union, making it one of 18 out of 122 Texas counties to vote against secession.[5]

In April, 30 men of Cooke County formed a Union League and signed a petition to Richmond objecting to the government's policy of exempting large slaveholders from the draft. A "Peace Party" was still active, although the state had joined the Confederacy by this time. Its members pledged to resist Confederate conscription.[6] Area slaveholders claimed to fear that the group was colluding with pro-Union forces from out of state and notified local authorities about the incidents.

Trials, executions, and lynchings

Site of the Great Hanging, 2016

On the morning of October 1, 1862, state troops led by the local provost, Colonel James G. Bourland began arresting suspected Unionists in the area. Some 150 men were arrested in thirteen days.[7] A total of nearly 200 were ultimately arrested.[6]

Bourland appointed Col. William Young, also a major slaveholder, to appoint a jury. He formed a "Citizens Court" of twelve jurors (seven were slaveholders) in Gainesville, the county seat.[6] This "court" had no legal status in Texas law. Bourland and Young together had reason to want to suppress dissent, as they owned more than one-quarter[8][9] of all slaves in the county.[6]

The jury began trying the suspects for insurrection and treason, with conviction by a simple majority vote.[10] After eight convictions, the jury decided to require a 2/3 majority vote for conviction. This resulted in reversal of the last conviction.[11] Those convicted were sentenced to be hanged within two days. Some were executed within hours.[12]

After the jury acquitted several men, a mob threatened to lynch all of the remaining prisoners. The head of the jury gave them fourteen names. These men were taken from jail and, without benefit of any trial, were lynched on October 12 and 13. The court adjourned.[13]

On October 16, Colonel William C. Young, who some say had attempted to moderate the proceedings, was killed while pursuing a group who had killed another man along a creek. Young's death resulted in public outrage, as some feared abolitionists had killed him. Two jurors who had left were replaced on the jury by hard-line Confederates. The jury reversed the acquittals of nineteen prisoners, although hearing no new evidence.[8] They convicted the men and sentenced them to death. These nineteen were hanged, with their executions supervised by Capt. Jim Young, the son of the colonel. The court released fifty to sixty men before Confederate and state courts finally halted its activities altogether.[14] A total of 41 men had been hanged in Gainesville in October 1862, and at least three others were shot to death.[15] They left "42 widows and about 300 children."[8]

Reaction

Texas newspapers and Governor Francis Richard Lubbock praised the hangings.[9][16] Pressure increased on dissenters in the state and the military was responsible for more deaths. Northern newspapers treated the events at Gainesville as an outrage when they learned of them later.

President Jefferson Davis remained silent, having already dismissed General Paul Octave Hébert on October 10 as military commander of Texas for his imposition of martial law and harsh measures in enforcing conscription. Confederate law had no punishment for men who failed to report for the draft.[9][17] Davis felt Hébert did not sufficiently control local commanders and provosts, and had allowed military atrocities to take place.[6] He appointed General John Bankhead Magruder to try to bring the state under control.[16]

But troubles continued for a time in North Texas, with hundreds of families fleeing the state to escape the violence and chaos. "Military commanders alternately helped lynch mobs or tried to quell them."[6] In Decatur, Capt. John Hill supervised the hanging of five men. A group of men were arrested in Sherman, Texas, but Brig. Gen. James W. Throckmorton intervened and was able to save all but five who had already been lynched. Separately in Sherman, E. Junius Foster, the editor of the Sherman Patriot, was murdered by Capt. Jim Young, the son of the late Col. Young, for publicly "applauding the death of his father."[9] In Denton, another partisan shot a prisoner dead.[6]

Legacy

Gainesville War Memorial, Leonard Park

A state historical marker erected by the Texas Historical Commission in 1964, during the Civil War centennial commemorations, defends the arrest and execution of these forty-two men. It claims the "Peace Party" had "sworn to destroy their government, kill their leaders, and bring in Federal troops." The speediness of the trial is defended as necessary due to "fears of rescue."[1] This narrative is known to have been based on incomplete material, as records had been lost or misplaced.[8]

Controversy about the event has continued in the 21st century. Gainesville, a city of 16,000, was named in 2012 by Rand McNally as "the most patriotic small town in America". That year the Cooke County Heritage Society planned an October event in Gainesville to mark the 150th anniversary of the Great Hanging, as part of Civil War history. It was cancelled after the mayor objected to marketing about it. The city provides funding to the society's museum, and directors feared losing support. The mayor wanted to emphasize the city's new "patriotic" status and the annual Depot Days instead. Descendants of the victims of the hanging were angry that the event would not be acknowledged. A member of the Cooke County Heritage Society said that, "Gainesville has been hiding from the Great Hanging since it happened."[18]

Colleen Carri, a heritage society board member, decided to combine the commemoration with the annual Clark family reunion already planned for October 13. She expected 220 attendees, including descendants of six other hanging victims. They called the event "Remembering Our Past, Embracing Our Future." Richard B. McCaslin, a history professor at University of North Texas, was scheduled as a speaker at the event.[18] He wrote Tainted Breeze: The Great Hanging at Gainesville, Texas 1862 (1994), considered the "first comprehensive study" of this event.[8]

At the same time, members of the local chapter of Sons of Confederate Veterans, who include some descendants of hanged men, had created a video, Black October 1862. They said some of the victims were not innocent but "traitors" for passing information to the enemy. McCaslin says there is no evidence of such activities. The SCV planned to screen their film October 13, 2012 at the Masonic Lodge in Gainesville.[18]

Some people in the city have led annual commemorations since 2007. A memorial for the victims of the Great Hangings was privately constructed in 2014. Consisting of two 5' x 6' granite slabs, it was installed at a small park which had been donated to the city near the site of the hangings. One slab is inscribed with the names of the 42 victims; the other gives a full account of events, based on documented history.[8]

See also

Footnotes

  1. ^ The slaveholders of Cooke County did not grow cotton, as the constant clogging of the Red River by debris and lack of railways prevented its reaching any market. Slaveholders instead dominated the production of goods sold locally. The 74 slaveholding families in Cooke County collectively held 369 slaves by 1860.[3]
  1. ^ a b Loewen 1999, pp. 177–82
  2. ^ McCaslin 1994, pp. 9–13, 14
  3. ^ McCaslin 1994, p. 16
  4. ^ McCaslin 1994, pp. 10, 11, 14 15–16, 18–19
  5. ^ McCaslin 1994, pp. 16, 19–20, 22–26, 27-28, 29, 32-34
  6. ^ a b c d e f g Parker & Boyd, 16 October 2012
  7. ^ McCaslin 1994, p. 73
  8. ^ a b c d e f Texas Observer, 17 November 2014
  9. ^ a b c d McCaslin, "Great Hanging of Texas"
  10. ^ McCaslin 1994, p. 74
  11. ^ McCaslin 1994, p. 76
  12. ^ McCaslin 1994, pp. 81–3
  13. ^ McCaslin 1994, pp. 81–3
  14. ^ McCaslin 1994, pp. 84–6
  15. ^ McCaslin 1994, p. 94
  16. ^ a b Texas Library and Archives Commission, Under the Rebel Flag
  17. ^ McCaslin 1994, p. 113
  18. ^ a b c Star Telegram, 8 October 2012

References

  • Campbell, Steve (October 8, 2012). "After 150 years, a dark chapter of Gainesville's past still stirs passions". Star-Telegram. Archived from the original on October 29, 2012. Retrieved October 9, 2012.
  • Loewen, James (1999). Lies Across America: What Our Historic Sites Get Wrong. New Press. ISBN 0-684-87067-3.
  • McCaslin, Richard B. (1994). Tainted Breeze: The Great Hanging at Gainesville, Texas 1862. Louisiana State University Press. ISBN 0-8071-1825-7.
  • McCaslin, Richard B. "Great Hanging of Texas". Handbook of Texas Online. Texas State Historical Association. Retrieved 11 August 2013.
  • Parker, Richard; Boyd, Emily (16 October 2012). "The Great Hanging at Gainesville". Opinionator. New York Times. Retrieved 11 August 2013.
  • Rapaport, Abby (17 November 2014). "Gainesville, Texas, Grapples with The Great Hanging". Texas Observer.
  • "Exhibit: Under the Rebel Flag: Life in Texas During the Civil War". Texas Library and Archives Commission. Retrieved 11 August 2013.

External links

  • "Great Hanging at Gainesville, 1862 – Gainesville ~ Marker Number: 5347". Texas Historic Sites Atlas. Texas Historical Commission. 1963.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Great_Hanging_at_Gainesville&oldid=869008960"
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Hanging_at_Gainesville
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Great Hanging at Gainesville"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA