Fome Zero

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fome Zero (Portuguese pronunciation: [ˈfɔmi ˈzɛɾu], Zero Hunger) is a Brazilian government program introduced by the then President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in 2003, with the goal to eradicate hunger and extreme poverty in Brazil.

Contents of the program

The program is co-ordinated by the Ministry of Social Development and Hunger Combat (Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome) and was intended to put into action the government's strategy to guarantee the right of access to basic food. The program takes a number of forms, ranging from direct financial aid to the poorest families (with the Bolsa Família card) to diverse strategies such as creating water cisterns in Brazil's semi-arid areas, creating low-cost restaurants, educating people about healthy eating habits, distributing vitamins and iron supplements, supporting subsistence family farming and giving access to microcredit.

Fome Zero is thought to be the biggest initiative to date by a Brazilian government to combat hunger in the history of the country, and builds on similar assistance programs implemented by previous governments.[citation needed]

Effects

The program is believed to have contributed to Brazil's recent reported improvements in its fight against poverty, according to research promoted by some universities and the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). An ex ante econometric evaluation of Bolsa Escola did find significant effects on both school attendance rates and the number of children involved in child labor.[1][2]

The World Bank, which created on June 2005 a Bolsa Família Project[3] to assist the Brazilian government in managing the Bolsa Família Program, declared that "Although the program is relatively young, some results are already apparent, including: (...) contributions to improved education outcomes, and impacts on children’s growth, food consumption, and diet quality".[4]

A study by the UNDP Poverty Centre found that over 80% of the Bolsa Familia benefits went to families in poverty (making under half the minimum wage per capita), thus most of the benefits were going to the poor.[5] BF was also claimed to have been responsible for about 20% of the drop in inequality in Brazil since 2001, which is welcome in one of the most unequal countries on the planet.[6] Research promoted by the World Bank showed a significant reduction in child labor exploitation among children benefited by the Bolsa Família program.[7]

The program has also been reported to have made a significant impact on the ability of the poorest families to eat. Children in public school receive one free meal a day—two in the poorest areas—and so less of their family's limited income is needed to pay for food. In a survey of Bolsa Familia recipients, 82.4% reported eating better; additionally, it was reported to increase the incomes of the poorer families by about 25%.[8]

Criticism

In 2003, David de Ferranti,[9] the World Bank IBRD representative for Latin America and the Caribbean, criticized the program,[10] due to its lack of clear focus, saying the program did not combat the country's poverty and income inequality. He also criticised the mechanisms for money donation and food gathering and distribution.

Fome Zero is considered by the opposition (especially the PSDB and DEM parties) as a failure, due to what they believe is the government's inability to manage the program effectively. Murilo Zauith, a PFL federal deputy, in March 2005, said the program was faulty, citing as an example the death of several indigenous children due to malnutrition in the city of Dourados, Mato Grosso do Sul. However, Humberto Costa, the Minister of Health at the time, considered the death count average and not alarming.[11]

Another criticism is that the program turned mostly in a money-transfer program, subject to corruption, and did not completely solved the problem.[12] Data from 2014-2015 showed that malnutrition is still a problem in Brazil and responsible by 4.3 deaths per 100,000 people per year, linked to the fact that 3.8% of the population (7.6 million people) still earns less than US$1 a day.[13][14]

See also

References

  1. ^ SSRN-Ex-ante Evaluation of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: The Case of Bolsa Escola by Francois Bourguignon, Francisco Ferreira, Phillippe Leite
  2. ^ RAWLINGS, Laura B. e RUBIO, Gloria M. Evaluating the Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs - Lessons from Latin America, Volume 1, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3119, August 2003, The World Bank, 2003.
  3. ^ Brazil - Bolsa Familia Project, The World Bank
  4. ^ Brazil’s Bolsa Familia Program Celebrates Progress in Lifting Families out of Poverty, News & Broadcast, The World Bank, Brasilia, Brazil, December 19, 2005
  5. ^ International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (UNDP/IPC-IG) Evaluation Note
  6. ^ untitled Archived October 13, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.
  7. ^ YAP, Yoon-Tien, Guilherme Sedlacek and Peter Orazem. 2001. Limiting Child Labor Through Behavior-Based Income Transfers: An Experimental Evaluation of the PETI Program in Rural Brazil. World Bank, Washington, DC
  8. ^ Microsoft PowerPoint - Mutzig_CCTs in MIC_Brazil_06-26_III.b.ppt
  9. ^ BIRD
  10. ^ Governo recebe novas críticas aos principais pontos do Fome Zero - Folha Online (March 31, 2003)
  11. ^ Murilo Zauith considera Fome Zero programa fracassado - Correio do Estado (March 11, 2005)
  12. ^ The Fome Zero Program – Brazil’s Losing Struggle to Help the Hungry: Lula’s Leadership Fading - Council on Hemispheric Affairs(July, 2005)
  13. ^ Malnutrition Death Rate Per 100,000 - WORLD HEALTH RANKINGS(Who, 2014)
  14. ^ Nutrition Landscape Information System (NLiS) - World Health Organization(March, 2017)

External links

  • (in Portuguese) Fome Zero Official Website
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fome_Zero&oldid=794539972"
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fome_Zero
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Fome Zero"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA