Derivative of the exponential map
In the theory of Lie groups, the exponential map is a map from the Lie algebra g of a Lie group G into G. In case G is a matrix Lie group, the exponential map reduces to the matrix exponential. The exponential map, denoted exp:g → G, is analytic and has as such a derivative d/dtexp(X(t)):Tg → TG, where X(t) is a C^{1} path in the Lie algebra, and a closely related differential dexp:Tg → TG.^{[2]}
The formula for dexp was first proved by Friedrich Schur (1891).^{[3]} It was later elaborated by Henri Poincaré (1899) in the context of the problem of expressing Lie group multiplication using Lie algebraic terms.^{[4]} It is also sometimes known as Duhamel's formula.
The formula is important both in pure and applied mathematics. It enters into proofs of theorems such as the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula, and it is used frequently in physics^{[5]} for example in quantum field theory, as in the Magnus expansion in perturbation theory, and in lattice gauge theory.
Throughout, the notations exp(X) and e^{X} will be used interchangeably to denote the exponential given an argument, except when, where as noted, the notations have dedicated distinct meanings. The calculusstyle notation is preferred here for better readability in equations. On the other hand, the expstyle is sometimes more convenient for inline equations, and is necessary on the rare occasions when there is a real distinction to be made.
Contents
Statement
The derivative of the exponential map is given by^{[6]}

(1)
 Explanation
 X = X(t) is a C^{1} (continuously differentiable) path in the Lie algebra with derivative X ´(t) = dX(t)/dt. The argument t is omitted where not needed.
 ad_{X} is the linear transformation of the Lie algebra given by ad_{X}(Y) = [X, Y]. It is the adjoint action of a Lie algebra on itself.
 The fraction 1 − exp(−ad_{X})/ad_{X} is given by the power series

(2)

derived from the power series of the exponential map of a linear endomorphism, as in matrix exponentiation^{[6]}
 When G is a matrix Lie group, all occurrences of the exponential are given by their power series expansion.
 When G is not a matrix Lie group, 1 − exp(−ad_{X})/ad_{X} is still given by its power series (2), while the other two occurrences of exp in the formula, which now are the exponential map in Lie theory, refer to the timeone flow of the left invariant vector field X, i.e. element of the Lie algebra as defined in the general case, on the Lie group G viewed as an analytic manifold. This still amounts to exactly the same formula as in the matrix case.
 The formula applies to the case where exp is considered as a map on matrix space over ℝ or ℂ, see matrix exponential. When G = GL(n, ℂ) or GL(n, ℝ), the notions coincide precisely.
To compute the differential dexp of exp at X, dexp_{X}:Tg_{X} → TG_{exp(X)}, the standard recipe^{[2]}
is employed. With Z(t) = X + tY the result^{[6]}

(3)
follows immediately from (1). In particular, dexp_{0}:Tg_{0} → TG_{exp(0)} = TG_{e} is the identity because Tg_{X} ≃ g (since g is a vector space) and TG_{e} ≃ g.
Proof
The proof given below assumes a matrix Lie group. This means that the exponential mapping from the Lie algebra to the matrix Lie group is given by the usual power series, i.e. matrix exponentiation. The conclusion of the proof still holds in the general case, provided each occurrence of exp is correctly interpreted. See comments on the general case below.
The outline of proof makes use of the technique of differentiation with respect to s of the parametrized expression
to obtain a first order differential equation for Γ which can then be solved by direct integration in s. The solution is then e^{X} Γ(1, t).
Lemma
Let Ad denote the adjoint action of the group on its Lie algebra. The action is given by Ad_{A}X = AXA^{−1} for A ∈ G, X ∈ g. A frequently useful relationship between Ad and ad is given by^{[7]}^{[nb 1]}

(4)
Proof
Using the product rule twice one finds,
Then one observes that
by (4) above. Integration yields
Using the formal power series to expand the exponential, integrating term by term, and finally recognizing (2),
and the result follows. The proof, as presented here, is essentially the one given in Rossmann (2002). A proof with a more algebraic touch can be found in Hall (2015).^{[8]}
By direct differentiation of the standard limit definition of the exponential, and exchanging the order of differentiation and limit,
where each factor owes its place to the noncommutativity of X(t) and X ´(t).
Divide the unit interval into N sections Δk = 1/N and let N → ∞, Δk → dk ≡ ds, k/N → s, Σ → ∫. It follows that
The virtue of a formal proof like this is that it tells what the right answer must be, provided it exists. Existence needs to be proved separately in each case.
Comments on the general case
The formula in the general case is given by^{[9]}
where^{[nb 2]}
which formally reduces to
Here the expnotation is used for the exponential mapping of the Lie algebra and the calculusstyle notation in the fraction indicates the usual formal series expansion. For more information and two full proofs in the general case, see the freely available Sternberg (2004) reference.
Applications
Local behavior of the exponential map
The inverse function theorem together with the derivative of the exponential map provides information about the local behavior of exp. Any C^{k}, 0 ≤ k ≤ ∞, ω map f between vector spaces (here first considering matrix Lie groups) has a C^{k} inverse such that f is a C^{k} bijection in an open set around a point x in the domain provided df_{x} is invertible. From (3) it follows that this will happen precisely when
is invertible. This, in turn, happens when the eigenvalues of this operator are all nonzero. The eigenvalues of 1 − exp(−ad_{X})/ad_{X} are related to those of ad_{X} as follows. If g is an analytic function of a complex variable expressed in a power series such that g(U) for a matrix U converges, then the eigenvalues of g(U) will be g(λ_{ij}), where λ_{ij} are the eigenvalues of U, the double subscript is made clear below.^{[nb 3]} In the present case with g(U) = 1 − exp(−U)/U and U = ad_{X}, the eigenvalues of 1 − exp(−ad_{X})/ad_{X} are
where the λ_{ij} are the eigenvalues of ad_{X}. Putting 1 − exp(−λ_{ij})/λ_{ij} = 0 one sees that dexp is invertible precisely when
The eigenvalues of ad_{X} are, in turn, related to those of X. Let the eigenvalues of X be λ_{i}. Fix an ordered basis e_{i} of the underlying vector space V such that X is lower triangular. Then
with the remaining terms multiples of e_{n} with n > i. Let E_{ij} be the corresponding basis for matrix space, i.e. (E_{ij})_{kl} = δ_{ik}δ_{jl}. Order this basis such that E_{ij} < E_{nm} if i − j < n − m. One checks that the action of ad_{X} is given by
with the remaining terms multiples of E_{mn} > E_{mn}. This means that ad_{X} is lower triangular with its eigenvalues λ_{ij} = λ_{i} − λ_{j} on the diagonal. The conclusion is that dexp_{X} is invertible, hence exp is a local bianalytical bijection around X, when the eigenvalues of X satisfy^{[10]}^{[nb 4]}
In particular, in the case of matrix Lie groups, it follows, since dexp_{0} is invertible, by the inverse function theorem that exp is a bianalytic bijection in a neighborhood of 0 ∈ g in matrix space. Furthermore, exp, is a bianalytic bijection from a neighborhood of 0 ∈ g in g to a neighborhood of e ∈ G.^{[11]} The same conclusion holds for general Lie groups using the manifold version of the inverse function theorem.
It also follows from the implicit function theorem that dexp_{ξ} itself is invertible for ξ sufficiently small.^{[12]}
Derivation of a Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula
If Z(t) is defined such that
an expression for Z(1) = log( expX expY ), the BCH formula, can be derived from the above formula,
Its lefthand side is easy to see to equal Y. Thus,
and hence, formally,^{[13]}^{[14]}
However, using the relationship between Ad and ad given by (4), it is straightforward to further see that
and hence
Putting this into the form of an integral in t from 0 to 1 yields,
an integral formula for Z(1) that is more tractable in practice than the explicit Dynkin's series formula due to the simplicity of the series expansion of ψ. Note this expression consists of X+Y and nested commutators thereof with X or Y. A textbook proof along these lines can be found in Hall (2015) and Miller (1972).
Derivation of Dynkin's series formula
Dynkin's formula mentioned may also be derived analogously, starting from the parametric extension
whence
so that, using the above general formula,
Since, however,
the last step by virtue of the Mercator series expansion, it follows that

(5)
and, thus, integrating,
It is at this point evident that the qualitative statement of the BCH formula holds, namely Z lies in the Lie algebra generated by X, Y and is expressible as a series in repeated brackets (A). For each k, terms for each partition thereof are organized inside the integral ∫dt t^{k−1}. The resulting Dynkin's formula is then

For a similar proof with detailed series expansions, see Rossmann (2002). For complete details, click on "show" below.
Change the summation index in (5) to k = n − 1 and expand

(97)
in a power series. To handle the series expansions simply, consider first Z = log(e^{X}e^{Y}). The logseries and the expseries are given by
respectively. Combining these one obtains

(98)
This becomes
(99) 
where S_{k} is the set of all sequences s = (i_{1}, j_{1}, …, i_{k}, j_{k}) of length 2k subject to the conditions in (99).
Now substitute (e^{X}e^{Y} − 1) for (e^{adtX}e^{adtY} − 1) in the LHS of (98). Equation (99) then gives
or, with a switch of notation, see An explicit Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula,
Note that the summation index for the rightmost e^{adtX} in the second term in (97) is denoted i_{k + 1}, but is not an element of a sequence s ∈ S_{k}. Now integrate Z = Z(1) = ∫dZ/dtdt, using Z(0) = 0,
Write this as
But this equals

(100)
using the simple observation that [T, T] = 0 for all T. That is, in (100), the leading term vanishes unless j_{k + 1} equals 0 or 1, corresponding to the first and second terms in the equation before it. In case j_{k + 1} = 0, i_{k + 1} must equal 1, else the term vanishes for the same reason (i_{k + 1} = 0 is not allowed). Finally, shift the index, k → k − 1,

This is Dynkin's formula. The striking similarity with (99) is not accidental: It reflects the Dynkin–Specht–Wever map, underpinning the original, different, derivation of the formula.^{[15]} Namely, if
is expressible as a bracket series, then necessarily^{[18]}

(B)
Putting observation (A) and theorem (B) together yields a concise proof of the explicit BCH formula.
See also
 Adjoint representation (ad)
 Adjoint representation (Ad)
 BakerCampbellHausdorff formula
 Exponential map
 Matrix exponential
 Matrix logarithm
 Magnus expansion
Remarks
 ^ A proof of the identity can be found in here. The relationship is simply that between a representation of a Lie group and that of its Lie algebra according to the Lie correspondence, since both Ad and ad are representations with ad = dAd.

^ It holds that
for z  1 < 1 where
Here, τ is the exponential generating function of
where b_{k} are the Bernoulli numbers.  ^ This is seen by choosing a basis for the underlying vector space such that U is triangular, the eigenvalues being the diagonal elements. Then U^{k} is triangular with diagonal elements λ_{i}^{k}. It follows that the eigenvalues of U are f(λ_{i}). See Rossmann 2002, Lemma 6 in section 1.2.
 ^ Matrices whose eigenvalues λ satisfy Im λ < π are, under the exponential, in bijection with matrices whose eigenvalues μ are not on the negative real line or zero. The λ and μ are related by the complex exponential. See Rossmann (2002) Remark 2c section 1.2.
Notes
 ^ Schmid 1982
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Rossmann 2002 Appendix on analytic functions.
 ^ Schur 1891
 ^ Poincaré 1899
 ^ Suzuki 1985
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} Rossmann 2002 Theorem 5 Section 1.2
 ^ Hall 2015 Proposition 3.35
 ^ See also Tuynman 1995 from which Hall's proof is taken.
 ^ Sternberg 2004 This is equation (1.11).
 ^ Rossman 2002 Proposition 7, section 1.2.
 ^ Hall 2015 Corollary 3.44.
 ^ Sternberg 2004 Section 1.6.
 ^ Hall 2015Section 5.5.
 ^ Sternberg 2004 Section 1.2.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Dynkin 1947
 ^ Rossmann 2002 Chapter 2.
 ^ Hall 2015 Chapter 5.
 ^ Sternberg 2004 Chapter 1.12.2.
References
 Dynkin, Eugene Borisovich (1947), "Вычисление коэффициентов в формуле Campbell–Hausdorff" [Calculation of the coefficients in the Campbell–Hausdorff formula], Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR (in Russian), 57: 323–326 ; translation from Google books.
 Hall, Brian C. (2015), Lie groups, Lie algebras, and representations: An elementary introduction, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 222 (2nd ed.), Springer, ISBN 9783319134666
 Miller, Wllard (1972), Symmetry Groups and their Applications, Academic Press, ISBN 0124974600
 Poincaré, H. (1899), "Sur les groupes continus", Cambridge Philos. Trans., 18: 220–55
 Rossmann, Wulf (2002), Lie Groups – An Introduction Through Linear Groups, Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Oxford Science Publications, ISBN 0 19 859683 9
 Schur, F. (1891), "Zur Theorie der endlichen Transformationsgruppen", Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg, 4: 15–32
 Suzuki, Masuo (1985). "Decomposition formulas of exponential operators and Lie exponentials with some applications to quantum mechanics and statistical physics". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 26 (4): 601. Bibcode:1985JMP....26..601S. doi:10.1063/1.526596.
 Tuynman (1995), "The derivation of the exponential map of matrices", Amer. Math. Monthly, 102 (9): 818–819, doi:10.2307/2974511, JSTOR 2974511
 Veltman, M, 't Hooft, G & de Wit, B (2007). "Lie Groups in Physics", online lectures.
 Wilcox, R. M. (1967). "Exponential Operators and Parameter Differentiation in Quantum Physics". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 8 (4): 962–982. Bibcode:1967JMP.....8..962W. doi:10.1063/1.1705306.
External links
 Sternberg, Shlomo (2004), Lie Algebras (PDF)
 Schmid, Wilfried (1982), "Poincaré and Lie groups" (PDF), Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 6 (2): 175–186, doi:10.1090/s027309791982149722