Demetrius III Eucaerus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Demetrius III Eucaerus
King of the Seleucid Empire (King of Syria)
Reign 95 BC (with Antiochus X Eusebes, Antiochus XI Epiphanes, and Philip I Philadelphus)
Predecessor Seleucus VI Epiphanes
Successor Philip I Philadelphus or Antiochus XII Dionysus
Born Unknown
Died 88 BC
Dynasty Seleucid
Father Antiochus VIII Grypus
Mother Tryphaena

Demetrius III (died 88 BC), called Eucaerus ("well-timed," possibly a misunderstanding of the derogative name Akairos, "the untimely one"), Philopator and Soter, was a ruler of the Seleucid kingdom, the son of Antiochus VIII Grypus and his wife Tryphaena.


The earliest coins struck in the name of Demetrius III started to be produced in Damascus in the Seleucid year (SE) 216 (97/96 BC);[note 1][2] only one Damascene obverse die is known from 97/96, indicating that Demetrius III's reign started late that year, giving him little time to produce more dies.[3] The only ancient literary dealing with Demetrius III's career are the works of Josephus and the Pesher Nahum, a sectarian commentary on the Book of Nahum.[4] Historian Kay Ehling noted that Josephus' account is a condensed summary, and that the actual course of events surrounding Demetrius III's seizure of power need to be reconstructed.[5] Thus, interpreting the numismatic evidence is instrumental for the problematic chronological reconstruction of Demetrius III's reign.[6]

Name and royal titulary

Demetrius (translit. Demetrios) is a Greek name that means "belonging to Demeter", the Greek goddess of fertility.[7] Seleucid kings were mostly named Seleucus and Antiochus; "Demetrius" was used by the Antigonid dynasty of Macedonia as a royal name, and its use by the Seleucids, who had Antigonid decent, probably signified that they were heirs of the latter.[8] Hellenistic kings did not use regnal numbers, which is a modern practice; instead, they used epithets to distinguish themselves from similarly named monarchs.[9][10] Demetrius III's most used epithets are Theos (divine), Philopator (father-loving) and Soter (saviour);[11] All his Damascene coins have the aforementioned epithets inscribed,[12] but some coins from Antioch and Cilicia have the epithets Philometor (mother-loving) and Euergetes (benefactor),[13][14] which also appear on some coins from Seleucia Pieria combined with the epithet Callinicus (nobly-victorious).[13] Theos Philopator Soter served to emphasise Demetrius III descent from the line of his grandfather Demetrius II who bore the epithet Theos; Soter was an epithet of Demetrius III's great-grandfather Demetrius I, while Philopator represented Demetrius III's devotion to his deceased father Antiochus VIII.[15] With Philometor, Demetrius III probably sought to emphasise his Ptolemaic decent through his mother Tryphaena.[16]

Eucaerus is a popular nickname used by the majority of modern historians to denote Demetrius III; this is a mistranscription of the nickname given by Josephus in his works The Jewish War and Antiquities of the Jews. The earliest Greek manuscripts of Josephus' works contain the nickname Akairos in three places. Eucaerus appeared as a later development, and is attested in the Latin versions of the manuscripts.[note 2][19] Eucaerus translates to "well-timed", while Akairos means "the untimely one".[20] Josephus did not explain the origin of Akairos;[21] he seems to be mocking Demetrius III's humiliating defeat after his almost complete victory.[22] Such popular nicknames are never found on coins, but are handed down through ancient literature only;[23] neither Eucaerus or Akairos were used by the king on his coinage.[24] Josephus is the only source for the nickname; in the view of historians David Levenson and Thomas Martin, Eucaerus should not be used to refer to the king; instead, Akairos, or one of Demetrius III's official epithets should be used.[19]

Manner of succession

According to Josephus, Ptolemy IX of Egypt installed Demetrius III in Damascus following the death of Antiochus XI 93 BC; this statement can not be correct as the date given by Josephus contradicts the numismatic evidence from Damascus.[2] Despite the chronological error, several arguments justify the existence of a collaboration between Ptolemy IX and Demetrius III;[25] according to Ehling, the assumption of the epithet Philometor (mother loving) was meant to highlight Demetrius III's relation to his uncle Ptolemy IX, the brother of Tryphaena.[16]

The numismatist Oliver Hoover viewed the ascendance of Demetrius III through the context of the war of sceptres, a military conflict between Ptolemy IX, and his mother Cleopatra III, who was allied with Alexander Jannaeus of Judaea. This war ended in 101 BC, and took place in Coele-Syria; Ptolemy IX was defeated and retreated to Cyprus. However, Hoover noted that Josephus synchronised the retreat of Ptolemy IX with the death of Antiochus VIII in 97/6 BC; such a synchronization is perceived as imprecise by many scholars, but Hoover suggested that Josephus consciously associated the two events. According to Hoover, Josephus' account regarding Ptolemy IX's installation of Demetrius III in Damascus indicates that the Egyptian monarch did not evacuate Syria after the conclusion of his war with Cleopatra III, or that he perhaps invaded a second time to help Demetrius III following the death of his father. Ptolemy IX probably hoped to use his nephew as an agent in the region; if Demetrius III was installed by his uncle in Damascus in 97/96 BC, then Josephus' synchronisation between Ptolemy IX's departure and the death of Antiochus VIII is correct.[26]

Ehling proposed a different reconstruction of events; he contested the dating of Antiochus VIII's death to 96 BC based on Demetrius III's earliest dated coins and argued in favour of 98/97 BC for the former's death and the latter's succession.[12] Ehling's argument agrees with the view of numismatist Arthur Houghton,[27] who noted that the volume of coins minted by Seleucus VI, the immediate successor of Antiochus VIII, before his takeover of Antioch in 95 BC, surpassed any other mint known from the late Seleucid period.[28] This led Houghton to suggest 98 or 97 BC instead of 96 BC for the death of Antiochus VIII as one year was not enough for Seleucus VI to produce his coins.[29] Hoover rejected the new dating, noting that it was not rare for a king to double his production in a single year at times of military campaigns, which was the case for Seleucus VI who was preparing for war against his uncle Antiochus IX.[30] The 96 BC date is deduced from the statement of Josephus who wrote that Antiochus VIII, who assumed the throne in 125 BC, ruled for twenty nine years and this date is corroborated by Porphyry who gave the year 97/96 for Antiochus VIII's death;[27] the academic consensus prefers the year 96 BC for the death of Antiochus VIII.[31]

Ehling's construction of Demetrius III's early reign have Demetrius III declaring himself king immediately after the death of his father;[32] with the help of Ptolemy IX, who, in the view of Ehling, probably supported his nephew with money, troops and ships,[5] Demetrius III landed in Seleucia in Pieria, whose inhabitants were known for being Ptolemaic sympathizers, and was crowned king.[16][33] Demetrius III then took Antioch and spent few weeks in the city before the arrival of Antiochus IX.[32] Demetrius III then marched on Damascus and made it his capital in 97 BC.[16] Ehling counted on numismatic arguments; since all the Damascene coins of Demetrius III, which ceased production when the monarch lost his throne, carried dates from 97/96 to 88/87 BC, and the coins bearing the epithets Philometor Euregetes from Antioch bear no dates, then it is logical to assume that the Antiochene issues preceded the Damascene one.[13] Ehling explained the change of royal titulary from Philometor Euergetes Callinicus in the north to Theos Philopator Soter in Damascus as a sign of a break between Demetrius III and Ptolemy IX; the Syrian king cast the epithet Philometor and instead invoked his father's heritage by assuming the epithet Philopator.[16] On the other hand, the majority of numismatists date Demetrius III's Antiochene coins to the year 88/87 BC.[34][35]

The struggle against Antiochus X

In 95 BC, Seleucus VI entered Antioch after defeating and killing Antiochus IX,[36] whose heir, Antiochus X, fled to Aradus and declared himself king.[37] In 94 BC, Seleucus VI was driven out of the capital by Antiochus X;[31] the former escaped to the Cilician city of Mopsuestia where he perished in during a local uprising.[38][39] Antiochus XI and Philip I avenged their brother and drove Antiochus X out of the capital in 93 BC,[40] but he was able to regain the city and kill Antiochus XI the same year.[5] At this point, according to Josephus, Demetrius III marched in support of his brother Philip I;[37] Demetrius III might have marched north earlier, to support Antiochus XI in his final battle.[41]

According to Josephus, Demetrius III and Philip I waged a fierce war against Antiochus X;[37] the language of Josephus indicates that the latter was in a defensive position rather than planning massive campaigns against his cousins.[42] However, in 220 SE (93/92 BC), no coins were produced for Demetrius III in Damascus; this could mean that he lost control over the city,[43] and it could be the result of incursions by Antiochus X.[44] Another possibility is that either the Judaeans or the Nabataeans took advantage of Demetrius III's departure to help his brother and occupied the city; the king regained Damascus in 221 SE (92/91 BC).[note 3][41] Antiochus X's date of death is unknown; traditional scholarship, with no evidence, have the year 92 BC for his end,[43] then have Demetrius III taking control of Antioch and ruling it for five years until his downfall in 87 BC.[42] Those traditional dates are hard to justify; using a methodology based on estimating the annual die usage average rate (the Esty formula), Hoover proposed the year 89/88 BC for the end of Antiochus X's reign.[note 4][46] It is estimated that only one to three dies were used by Demetrius III for his Antiochene coins, a number too small to justify a five years long reign in Antioch;[42] no literary source specify the year 92 BC as the date of Demetrius III's occupation of Antioch,[47] and none of his Antiochene coins contain a date.[48]

Judaean Campaign

Following the defeat of Alexander Jannaeus at the hands of the Nabataeans, Judaea was caught in a civil war;[49] the conflict was between the king and a religious group called the Pharisees.[50]

To the south he defeated the Maccabean king Alexander Jannaeus in battle, following a request for assistance by Jewish rebels, but the hostility of the local Jewish population forced him to withdraw. While attempting to dethrone his brother, Philip I Philadelphus, he was defeated by the Arabs and the Parthian Empire, and taken prisoner. He was kept in confinement in Parthia by Mithridates II until his death in 88 BC. [note 5]

See also


  1. ^ Some dates in the article are given according to the Seleucid era which is indicated when two years have a slash separating them. Each Seleucid year started in the late autumn of a Gregorian year; thus, a Seleucid year overlaps two Gregorian ones.[1]
  2. ^ Eucaerus also appears in the tables of contents written in the sixth century for the older Greek manuscripts. Those tables are actually summaries of the main text;[17] they sometimes contain discrepancies with the main work.[18]
  3. ^ According to Hoover, the account of Josephus, regarding the installation of Demetrius III in Damascus by Ptolemy IX following the death of Antiochus XI, might actually be a conflation of two actions by the Egyptian king; an initial support in 216 (97/96 BC), and a second one in 221 SE (92/91 BC).[41]
  4. ^ The Esty formula was developed by the mathematician Warren W. Esty; it is a mathematical formula that can calculate the relative number of obverse dies used to produce a certain coin series. The calculation can be used to measure the coinage's production of a certain king and thus estimate the length of his reign.[45]
  5. ^ The numismatist Joseph Hilarius Eckhel attributed a coin from Sidon to Demetrius III; in fact, this piece belongs to Demetrius II.[51]



  1. ^ Biers 1992, p. 13.
  2. ^ a b Atkinson 2016a, p. 10.
  3. ^ Hoover, Houghton & Veselý 2008, p. 204.
  4. ^ Levenson & Martin 2009, p. 311.
  5. ^ a b c Ehling 2008, p. 239.
  6. ^ Levenson & Martin 2009, p. 310.
  7. ^ Hoschander 1915, p. 651.
  8. ^ Bevan 2014, p. 56.
  9. ^ McGing 2010, p. 247.
  10. ^ Hallo 1996, p. 142.
  11. ^ Burgess 2004, p. 23.
  12. ^ a b Ehling 2008, p. 232.
  13. ^ a b c Ehling 2008, pp. 232, 233.
  14. ^ Houghton, Lorber & Hoover 2008, p. nr. 2444.
  15. ^ Hoover, Houghton & Veselý 2008, p. 212.
  16. ^ a b c d e Ehling 2008, p. 240.
  17. ^ Levenson & Martin 2009, p. 315.
  18. ^ Levenson & Martin 2009, p. 316.
  19. ^ a b Levenson & Martin 2009, p. 307.
  20. ^ Levenson & Martin 2009, p. 309.
  21. ^ Levenson & Martin 2009, p. 335.
  22. ^ Levenson & Martin 2009, p. 336.
  23. ^ Ehling 2008, p. 97.
  24. ^ Levenson & Martin 2009, p. 313.
  25. ^ Dąbrowa 2011, p. 177.
  26. ^ Hoover 2006, p. 28.
  27. ^ a b Ehling 2008, p. 231.
  28. ^ Houghton 1989, pp. 97, 98.
  29. ^ Houghton 1989, p. 98.
  30. ^ Hoover 2007, p. 286.
  31. ^ a b Houghton 1989, p. 97.
  32. ^ a b Ehling 2008, p. 234.
  33. ^ Kosmin 2014, p. 133.
  34. ^ Hoover, Houghton & Veselý 2008, p. 208.
  35. ^ Lorber & Iossif 2009, p. 103.
  36. ^ Downey 2015, p. 133.
  37. ^ a b c Josephus 1833, p. 421.
  38. ^ Houghton 1998, p. 66.
  39. ^ Bellinger 1949, pp. 73, 74.
  40. ^ Houghton 1987, p. 79.
  41. ^ a b c Hoover, Houghton & Veselý 2008, p. 214.
  42. ^ a b c Hoover 2007, p. 293.
  43. ^ a b Hoover 2007, p. 290.
  44. ^ Atkinson 2016b, p. 127.
  45. ^ Hoover 2007, pp. 282–284.
  46. ^ Hoover 2011, p. 257.
  47. ^ Hoover 2007, p. 294.
  48. ^ Schürer 1973, p. 135.
  49. ^ Bar-Kochva 1996, p. 138.
  50. ^ Dąbrowa 2011, pp. 175.
  51. ^ Bellinger 1949, pp. 75.


  • Bar-Kochva, Bezalel (1996). Pseudo Hecataeus, "On the Jews": Legitimizing the Jewish Diaspora. Hellenistic Culture and Society. 21. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-26884-5. 
  • Schürer, Emil (1973) [1874]. Vermes, Geza; Millar, Fergus; Black, Matthew, eds. The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ. I (2014 ed.). Bloomsbury T&T Clark. ISBN 978-1-472-55827-5. 
  • Atkinson, Kenneth (2016a). "Historical and Chronological Observations on Josephus's Account of Seleucid History in Antiquities 13.365-371: Its Importance for Understanding the Historical Development of the Hasmonean State". Scripta Judaica Cracoviensia. Uniwersytet Jagielloński. 14. ISSN 1733-5760. 
  • Atkinson, Kenneth (2016b). A History of the Hasmonean State: Josephus and Beyond. T&T Clark Jewish and Christian Texts. 23. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-0-567-66903-2. 
  • Atkinson, Kenneth (2016c). "Understanding the Relationship Between the Apocalyptic Worldview and Jewish Sectarian Violence: The Case of the War Between Alexander Jannaeus and Demetrius III". In Grabbe, Lester L.; Boccaccini, Gabriele; Zurawski, Jason M. The Seleucid and Hasmonean Periods and the Apocalyptic Worldview. The Library of Second Temple Studies. 88. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-0-567-66615-4. 
  • Houghton, Arthur (1987). "The Double Portrait Coins of Antiochus XI and Philip I: a Seleucid Mint at Beroea?". Schweizerische Numismatische Rundschau. Schweizerischen Numismatischen Gesellschaft. 66. ISSN 0035-4163. 
  • Bellinger, Alfred R. (1949). "The End of the Seleucids". Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences. Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences. 38. OCLC 4520682. 
  • Houghton, Arthur (1998). "The Struggle for the Seleucid Succession, 94–92 BC: a New Tetradrachm of Antiochus XI and Philip I of Antioch". Schweizerische Numismatische Rundschau. Schweizerischen Numismatischen Gesellschaft. 77. ISSN 0035-4163. 
  • Josephus (1833) [c. 94]. Burder, Samuel, ed. The Genuine Works of Flavius Josephus, the Jewish Historian. Translated by Whiston, William. Kimber & Sharpless. OCLC 970897884. 
  • Downey, Robert Emory Glanville (2015) [1961]. A History of Antioch in Syria from Seleucus to the Arab Conquest. Princeton University Pres. ISBN 978-1-400-87773-7. 
  • Kosmin, Paul J. (2014). The Land of the Elephant Kings: Space, Territory, and Ideology in the Seleucid Empire. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-72882-0. 
  • Biers, William R. (1992). Art, Artefacts and Chronology in Classical Archaeology. Approaching the Ancient World. 2. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-06319-7. 
  • Hoover, Oliver D. (2007). "A Revised Chronology for the Late Seleucids at Antioch (121/0-64 BC)". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. Franz Steiner Verlag. 56 (3). ISSN 0018-2311. 
  • Houghton, Arthur (1989). "The Royal Seleucid Mint of Seleucia on the Calycadnus". In Le Rider, Georges Charles; Jenkins, Kenneth; Waggoner, Nancy; Westermark, Ulla. Kraay-Mørkholm Essays. Numismatic Studies in Memory of C.M. Kraay and O. Mørkholm. Numismatica Lovaniensia. 10. Université Catholique de Louvain: Institut Supérieur d'Archéologie et d'Histoire de l'Art. Séminaire de Numismatique Marcel Hoc. OCLC 910216765. 
  • Hoover, Oliver (2006). "A Late Hellenistic Lead Coinage from Gaza". Israel Numismatic Research. The Israel Numismatic Society. 1. ISSN 1565-8449. 
  • Hoover, Oliver D.; Houghton, Arthur; Veselý, Petr (2008). "The Silver Mint of Damascus under Demetrius III and Antiochus XII (97/6 BC-83/2 BC)". American Journal of Numismatics. second. American Numismatic Society. 20. ISBN 978-0-89722-305-8. ISSN 1053-8356. 
  • Burgess, Michael Roy (2004). "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress– The Rise and Fall of Cleopatra II Selene, Seleukid Queen of Syria". The Celator. Kerry K. Wetterstrom. 18 (3). ISSN 1048-0986. 
  • Houghton, Arthur; Lorber, Catherine; Hoover, Oliver D. (2008). Seleucid Coins, A Comprehensive Guide: Part 2, Seleucus IV through Antiochus XIII. 1. The American Numismatic Society. ISBN 978-0-980-23872-3. 
  • Bevan, Edwyn (2014) [1927]. A History of Egypt under the Ptolemaic Dynasty. Routledge Revivals. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-68225-7. 
  • Hoschander, Jacob (1915). "Review: Recent Assyro-Babylonian Literature". The Jewish Quarterly Review. new series. University of Pennsylvania Press. 5 (4). ISSN 0021-6682. JSTOR 1451298. 
  • Hallo, William W. (1996). Origins. The Ancient Near Eastern Background of Some Modern Western Institutions. Studies in the History and Culture of the Ancient Near East. 6. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-10328-3. ISSN 0169-9024. 
  • McGing, Brian C. (2010). Polybius' Histories. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-199-71867-2. 
  • Lorber, Catharine C.; Iossif, Panagiotis (2009). "Seleucid Campaign Beards". L'Antiquité Classique. l’asbl L’Antiquité Classique. 78. ISSN 0770-2817. 
  • Ehling, Kay (2008). Untersuchungen Zur Geschichte Der Späten Seleukiden (164-63 v. Chr.) Vom Tode Antiochos IV. Bis Zur Einrichtung Der Provinz Syria Unter Pompeius. Historia – Einzelschriften (in German). 196. Franz Steiner Verlag. ISBN 978-3-515-09035-3. ISSN 0071-7665. 
  • Dąbrowa, Edward (2011). "Demetrius III in Judea". Electrum: Journal of Ancient History. Instytut Historii. Uniwersytet Jagielloński (Department of Ancient History at the Jagiellonian University). 18. ISBN 978-8-323-33053-0. ISSN 1897-3426. 
  • Bijovsky, Gabriela (2012). "The Coins from Khirbat Burnaṭ (Southwest)". 'Atiqot. Israel Antiquities Authority. 69. ISSN 0792-8424. 
  • Levenson, David B.; Martin, Thomas R. (2009). "Akairos or Eukairos? The Nickname of the Seleucid King Demetrius III in the Transmission of the Texts of Josephus' War and Antiquities". Journal for the Study of Judaism. Brill. 40 (3). ISSN 0047-2212. 
  • Houghton, Arthur; Müseler, Wilhelm (1990). "The Reigns of Antiochus VIII and Antiochus IX at Damascus". Schweizer Münzblätter. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Numismatik. 159: 61. ISSN 0016-5565. 
  • Retso, Jan (2003). The Arabs in Antiquity: Their History from the Assyrians to the Umayyads. RoutledgeCurzon. ISBN 978-1-136-87282-2. 

External links

  • Demetrius III Eucaerus at Livius: Articles on Ancient History
  • Demetrius III Eucaerus at the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia
Demetrius III Eucaerus
Born: Unknown Died: 88 BC
Preceded by
Seleucus VI Epiphanes
Seleucid King (King of Syria)
95 BC
with Antiochus X Eusebes (95 BC)
Antiochus XI Epiphanes (95 BC)
Philip I Philadelphus (95 BC)
Succeeded by
Philip I Philadelphus or Antiochus XII Dionysus
Retrieved from ""
This content was retrieved from Wikipedia :
This page is based on the copyrighted Wikipedia article "Demetrius III Eucaerus"; it is used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA). You may redistribute it, verbatim or modified, providing that you comply with the terms of the CC-BY-SA